Reply With Quote
I cant, I'm already drilling yours
She is the one requesting a sandwich by the way
Only an idiot would elect to be dishonest for the sake of protecting their sports team.
I cant, I'm already drilling yours
She is the one requesting a sandwich by the way
No one's being dishonest. I GENUINELY think you do a job of trolling.
The answer can be found in the text perhaps you need help with reading comprehension.
Moreover, you ignore my original question in order to troll my thread but demand I answer your question? lol. Go yourself.
Only a huge gaping vagina would have avoided my question twice, going on three times already.
Laker fans seem to enjoy it. That would be the targeted audience.
Are you really that stupid that you think I'm posting things here to impress you?
So the answer is no, this is not a relevant basketball discussion.
Making people "face their fears" has nothing to do with talking basketball, moron.
Counting rings does not involve a "discussion."
You are an idiot.
lol acting like a humongous pussyMoreover, you ignore my original question in order to troll my thread but demand I answer your question? lol. Go yourself.
Like you've avoided my original question for what? 6 posts and counting?
That makes you the Moby of vaginas.
Are you really that stupid that you think your contributions are impressive?
Look at how unnerved you've become just because of a simple quesion. LMAO!
And you think you don't have an issue here with the subject at hand? Lol
No, talking about relative success of an NBA franchise and an NBA player has nothing to do with basketball. Brilliant! You are one smart er!
Rhetorical questions do not require an actual answer, as they are self-answering in nature.
Your Moby reference is also quite misused.
I don't have an issue with the topic. I do quite enjoy making you look incredibly foolish, even for a troll.
Who has more Finals MVPs over the same period?
I clearly stated they weren't intended to impress you. Did that concept fly over your head or do you just feel the need to run your fat mouth at every given chance just to have something to say?
I AM NOT HERE TO IMPRESS YOU.
If you don't like the content of my posts or threads you are welcome to be a sane individual and not reply.
1. Rings is still a stupid argument because it takes a team to win a ring.
2. Kobe is better than Duncan. Anyone who says otherwise is either a Kobe hater or a Duncan lover.
h2 , does it hurt having a camel toe up to your navel?
By crying and whining incessantly?
I'm dribbling your head around like a basketball and you don't even know it. You called this a "troll thread" but yet you're on the hook and furiously biting on the line like a dumbass fish who thinks he's stronger than the hook lodged in his mouth.
Like I said before BRILLIANT! Just like your assertion that this was not a basketball related discussion.
blah blah blah, Moby vagina has to have an answer to everything because he's a bitter little troll on a message board.
Are you still claiming this is not a basketball related topic?
You start a topic using ONLY tired, ST-cliche' ring smack then accuse MY posts of lacking substance...
Tha ?
Your presence here proves otherwise...
but carry on with your clever and original picture postings.
You consider facing your fears to be basketball related. You consider counting rings to be a relevant "discussion". I consider you to be a re .
LOL avoiding my question still and not acknowledging your question was rhetorical.
Yup. That's all he's got. Name calling.Name calling?
Such a moron of epic proportions that when called upon to answer a simple question he whines, cries, name calls and lies all in order to spam troll a simple basketball related thread.
Severe psychological damage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
