Because fans struggle with the concept of acknowledging how many championships their franchise has won?
true, the inclusion of the word "franchise" makes this question stupid.
Because fans struggle with the concept of acknowledging how many championships their franchise has won?
it's just crappy wording for the question, even in you responding to me you reword it. Fittingly i might add.
I answered it you ing moron.
The threat le was about "rings" not "championships"... idiot troll can't even get his straight. Don't try changing your words now, goober.
That's because you know the answer but you want to find any reason to avoid answering it.
They are synonymous in a discussion of this nature.
You don't think I specifically elected to choose the word "rings" exactly to incite this type of fanboy reaction? Lol
Just like on espn I own you boy.
Don't try to cover yourself to save face. It's too late now.
Uh huh...
Please re-explain how you're counting all rings handed out to each player in order to "win" a winless argument....
5 months later...
Kobe still has more.
It's also still the same season.
Only an idiot would bump this thread before the playoffs even start.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You can't win rings 5 months after the previous final you dumb .
Hey guys, just in case you're new to the NBA like history2b, between November and May no championships are won.
Really? I thought I missed the Finals already with all the talk of the Spurs being the best team for months?
They didn't win a 'ship? You guys sure?
Having the best record will usually make people talk about you being the best team. Not hard logic.
I really don't think it's wise to bump all your old threads (before you lost the priveledge . . . twice lol) unless you wanted everyone to have a refresher course on your rampant stupidity.
@ Cavs logic
So the Spurs have more rings in your eyes?
I never said it was right, just that's what happens.
You'll stand on a box when you talk to me.
Which is why I![]()
He needs to bow down to Shaq and Jerry West.
so youover Muse's observation, or over his logic?
Question.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)