Reply With Quote
So you admit that it is your intention to do so. If your intentions were to become reality, that would be a great waste of a forum. I'm not sure if that would be something to be proud about.
Says the poster who obsessively follows me around in every thread....
So you admit that it is your intention to do so. If your intentions were to become reality, that would be a great waste of a forum. I'm not sure if that would be something to be proud about.
LMAO what a dumb ing thread...
I have a question to ask for opinion, too!
Which player will retire with more rings...Shaq or Kevin Garnett????
Making stupid threads will cause the forum residents, such as myself, to call you out on your attention whoring ways.
It's quickly becoming clear you are an obsessed malcontent, butthurt over the Spurs achievements. Most people don't make "2 threads per day", either, thus proving further you are also compulsive.
Aw geez.....another Kobe vs. Duncan thread.
How original.....NOT!
Definitely Shaq since he has 4 and KG has 1.
But I can see how your brain correlated that to asking about one player who currently has 5 and the other has 4.
Doesn't excuse your obsessive compulsive behavior.
If you and your moronic cohorts cannot answer simple questions or if you don't like them just not respond then I cannot help you.
So you agree you are obsessive compulsive.
Have you notified your doctor about this issue? It can be rectified with light medication and will spare the NBA forum further insanity.
Nope, didn't admit what my intention was, just acknowledged the reality that regardless of what I "intend" to happen, it does not ever affect the entire board in the way that you claim.
Of course it doesn't affect the entire board. I'm just wondering why you have such an obsession with comparing the two teams, rather than have discussion about other topics at hand that could be more relevant.
I read the other topics and they aren't very interesting.
The topics I initiate are, which is exactly why you are here right now and not out talking about all those "other" things that you deem to be more relevant.
I do leave in my input in other threads as well. And I don't necessarily find this topic interesting. After awhile of the comparison threads they seem to drag on and get plain. I'm just asking why you are so obsessed with the Spurs/Lakers comparisons and then I can make my way out.
lol mr bottomtooth regulating the gots hes supposed to regulate
no suprises here. keep up the good work, bottomtooth
I assume I'm not getting my answer then. No worries. Take your time and you can say it when you're comfortable.
I've answered your question several times, perhaps you need to go back and read?
2010 Dallas Mavericks > 1969 Boston Celtics
LMAO!!
lol at believing your own topics are more interesting.
You should make another.
lol pink
lol can't start threads
2b, working this Board like a part time job.
lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LMAO Laker hisdildo2b can't start ty threads anymore.
True, but, Bryant still shoveled. Pierce still had his sternum cracked. Artest still operated/open heart style.
It seems to me every one of your threads asks questions that if Spurs fans answer, they admit what is usually historical fact, and it is always a Lakers advantage over the Spurs.
Do you think Germany wants to keep hearing the allies beat them twice in world wars? how about Adlai Stevenson getting crushed twice by DDE for president in 1952 and 1956?
Live for the present and for the future! Oh wait, you can't start threads.
Looks like no more important basketball discussions for the 2b. We warned 'im, and not even Cully could bring him to his senses.
lol can't start threads...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
