Reply With Quote
Dammit we should have traded g.hill when his stock was high.
Manu is still the .
Rj is getting better.
Every sentence in this post is beyond ing stupid. Overreact much?
Dammit we should have traded g.hill when his stock was high.
Manu is still the .
Rj is getting better.
No wonder our defense looks so bad; I WANT BOGANS BACK!
BRING BACK BOGANS RC BUFORD!!!
Yep, but I think it's a matter of thinking too much, sometimes he hesitates doing things he can obviously do easily (like a couple layups in the begining of the game)...
I wanna see his jumpshots though, hat the only thing that can make him an allstar caliber player.
Nah, not every sentence. When he said Blair may not be starting for long, I think that's fair, because if Tiago is as good as he's been billed, I expect him to start.
But somehow, I doubt I'm thinking along the same lines as our chicken little here.
Yeah I liked the play of those guys. Only guy I am not pleased with is George Hill passing up OPEN shots. Not worried about Hill's turnovers just the fact that he is passing up open shots. He cannot be a mental midget. He can't be this flustered over nothing if we're to be an elite team. Just shoot it with confidence.
I don't know why people are saying if we're struggling against the Pacers we're in trouble against other big teams. Has anyone seen Roy Hibbert? You don't get much bigger than that. I really like this guy and would have loved it if the Spurs could have gotten him.
The perimeter and transition D has been horrible. Well actually, pretty much every phase of defense has been poor. If the D doesn't turn it up, the Spurs are a dry spell away from getting run over.
Lmao...a 1st game, 1st half meltdown???
We can get into defensive personnel all we want and how the Pacers are better offensively than they appear to be on paper, the bottom line is it's inexcusable to come out and give up 65 points to them in the season opener.
If this is some random game in the midst of the season during a hectic part of the schedule and this occurs, fine (so long as it's not a recurring trend). But game one, at home, for a team that fancies itself a contender and claims they're determined to start fast this season? Unacceptable.
I don't see a team that wants to start fast, or prove, not just to the rest of the league, but more importantly to themselves, that they can be a contender. I see the typical Spurs game against an also-ran. Come out, exert as little energy as possible and just hope to out talent the opposition. Not the way to set the tone for the season.
I like the intensity of the offense, but it still a lot of improvisations/one on ones...
Who's in Boston? Bogans? Do you even know what team he plays for?
And we're leading.Lmao...a 1st game, 1st half meltdown???
At least it doesn't take SpursTalk long to start clicking on all cylinders.
I think he's referring to Shaq.
Manu Ginobili with 4 3-pointers made to help my fantasy team, not bad, Manu, not bad at all. Should not have benched Turner. Now got Salmons and Melo crapping their beds.
Spurs will be fine, even if they lose this game.
I reckon TP lost his tear drop when he started working with Chip Engelland. He missed one badly again at the end of the half.
I want to see TP get that tear drop runner back.
Just realize hibbert was on my best fantasy team.
Indiana looks like they may be the Milwaukee Bucks of this year...
Defense should tighten a lot in the second half.
lolwut Cleveland beat Boston.
I agree that Splitter will start over Blair so I was just giving him . Ok 75% of that post was beyond stupid.
Pop is surely giving them the "hair dryer" treatment right now...
Roger Mason tonight - 0-3, 1 FT, 1 pt, 2 reb, 1 ast
Giving up consecutive 30+ quarters is inexcusable. Thankfully this is the Pacers, and we might still win this.
He quoted someone asking about the centerpiece (everyone knows that's in reference to Bogans) and he said he's in Boston.
If Texas 2 Step has got a thing for Shaq and that's his own "centerpiece" then he needs to specify that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
