Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 42 of 42
  1. #26
    All Hail the Legatron The Reckoning's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    10,568
    that zork game looks fun, tbh

  2. #27
    Manure Ginobili Mixability's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    7,749
    Damn, I still remember being amazed by NBA Live 2000.... that was the first 3d one right?

  3. #28
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    803
    Damn, I still remember being amazed by NBA Live 2000.... that was the first 3d one right?
    I BELIEVE nba2k on the dreamcast was the first 3d one... could be wrong though...


  4. #29
    --- SAtown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    8,265
    In the Zone for the ps1 (circa 98-99) was the first 3d bball game. Rodman's hair also changed colors each game

  5. #30
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    dont forget the big head feature

  6. #31
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216


    WTF is that Spurs player (Robinson?) doing ?

    It reminds me of Bynum in the NBA Live

  7. #32
    Manure Ginobili Mixability's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    7,749
    I BELIEVE nba2k on the dreamcast was the first 3d one... could be wrong though...

    Nah, I meant to say that was the first Live to go 3D, right?

  8. #33
    No darkness Cry Havoc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    33,683


    WTF is that Spurs player (Robinson?) doing ?

    It reminds me of Bynum in the NBA Live
    Tip off animation. Players used to move like scarecrows. Oh wait, right, Bynum, they still do.

  9. #34
    CDs Nuts. resistanze's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    23,869
    LOL @ DRob doing the C-Walk in that screenshot.

  10. #35
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    i remember playin nbalive2003 the arcade mode was awesome...the dunk package in that game was nasty, under the leg, reverse 360 mainly all of vcs dunks in the asg that year b4 was in that game...

  11. #36
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    Tip off animation. Players used to move like scarecrows. Oh wait, right, Bynum, they still do.



  12. #37
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    1,188
    I dont care what anyone says. Cs is the , its gameplay > graphics trumps most multiplayer games

  13. #38
    No darkness Cry Havoc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    33,683
    I dont care what anyone says. Cs is the , its gameplay > graphics trumps most multiplayer games
    Counterstrike? Oh, absolutely.

    The only thing I dislike about Counterstrike (and this is a single dislike in a sea of loves) is the fact that often times it was far too defensive of a game. Dust 2 was an amazing map because there was no real advantage for either side. the elevation advantage the Ts had was curbed somewhat by the fact that they also had to plant a bomb.

    Other than that though, there were times on certain maps that I felt completely helpless to do anything, because the CTs would just lock their side down and sit on it with awps. Even with smoke, against good players it is almost impossible to penetrate defenses unless your team knows precisely how to behave and respond, and even then it can put you at a disadvantage.

  14. #39
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    Counterstrike? Oh, absolutely.

    The only thing I dislike about Counterstrike (and this is a single dislike in a sea of loves) is the fact that often times it was far too defensive of a game. Dust 2 was an amazing map because there was no real advantage for either side. the elevation advantage the Ts had was curbed somewhat by the fact that they also had to plant a bomb.

    Other than that though, there were times on certain maps that I felt completely helpless to do anything, because the CTs would just lock their side down and sit on it with awps. Even with smoke, against good players it is almost impossible to penetrate defenses unless your team knows precisely how to behave and respond, and even then it can put you at a disadvantage.
    I always found CS was slightly CT sided (for detonation, T sided for hostage rescue but de_ was the only league supported mode). A good CT team could rape terrorists time and time again unless they really had their together.

    Of course, pug or pub, the t's often have a big advantage simply by forcing their will down 1 site's throat and a lack of communication ruining any chance for reinforcements.

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    1,188
    Counterstrike? Oh, absolutely.

    The only thing I dislike about Counterstrike (and this is a single dislike in a sea of loves) is the fact that often times it was far too defensive of a game. Dust 2 was an amazing map because there was no real advantage for either side. the elevation advantage the Ts had was curbed somewhat by the fact that they also had to plant a bomb.

    Other than that though, there were times on certain maps that I felt completely helpless to do anything, because the CTs would just lock their side down and sit on it with awps. Even with smoke, against good players it is almost impossible to penetrate defenses unless your team knows precisely how to behave and respond, and even then it can put you at a disadvantage.
    Strictly speaking from a scrimming pov, I am not trying to bull you but d2 is a general T sided map. I also don't see this elevation advantage o__o.

    Agreed certain maps are very ct sided but even great awpers fall to counter awps. It really takes coordinated teamwork (unless your team is >>>>>>>> than the opposing team in aim) at the international tournament level to break through any ct because it is much easier to play ct than T

    I always found CS was slightly CT sided (for detonation, T sided for hostage rescue but de_ was the only league supported mode). A good CT team could rape terrorists time and time again unless they really had their together.

    Of course, pug or pub, the t's often have a big advantage simply by forcing their will down 1 site's throat and a lack of communication ruining any chance for reinforcements.
    Yup for scrimming it is de anyways but at the professional level, a team won't usually rape the other one (unless they are very good or just got amazingly lucky)

  16. #41
    No darkness Cry Havoc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    33,683
    Strictly speaking from a scrimming pov, I am not trying to bull you but d2 is a general T sided map. I also don't see this elevation advantage o__o.
    I'm aware that Dust2 is a T favored map. There are too many ways T can go to force a bomb plant for CT to stop. However, it was such a dynamic map and it was about as close to balanced as any map could be, I think CS_Office was probably one of the few standard maps that offered a similar level of play, although that also favored T because of the long hallway.

    You don't see the elevation advantage? T starts on top of a ramp at the highest point on the map, while CTs start at the very lowest and have to work their way up. Yes, they can rush to A to even the playing field, but even then they are only better situationally because Ts can hard rush far right or go through mid to A, or both.

    Elevation is a huge advantage because you can see the enemy's entire torso when they can only see your upper shoulders/etc. It also gives you more distance on smoke/flash/nades, and makes it easier to funnel throws down toward the CTs. I would say the choke points arguably favor Ts as well, because of how many forward areas they have to hide.

  17. #42
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    That one just almost fills my screen.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •