Reply With Quote
In this forum, I've learned to quit reading when that phrase is used.
so then you agree that the guy was simply a man with no chance to win and the dems hedging their bets with crist..... he happened to be black yoni....
so now I predict that your side is going to try and inflame this issue for political gain...
In this forum, I've learned to quit reading when that phrase is used.
so then you don't agree..
if Yoni sees fit to add asmily to a "story," it's pretty much
upon arrival
See, that's the reason you quit reading; I have no idea with what you're ascribing my assent or dissent.
My post was pointing out the hypocrisy of the left-wing talking point that whomever disagrees with Obama's agenda is a racist simply because he's a black man.
Similarly, there are apparently a group of black people who are pissed that Clinton tried to get Meeks to drop out of the race, ostensibly because they believe he did it due to Meeks' race.
I think the whole racialization of politics is a Democrat/liberal phenomenon. Y'all have at it...
Oh, and nice comeback on the
I invite you to ignore my posts. I've never asked anyone in here to read what I post. But, in the time I've been posting here, I dare say my input has stirred more response, debate, and general forum activity than has yours.
Cheers!
Even your hangman vs. popcorn post had a certain juvenile, elementary-school air about it.
Last edited by Yonivore; 10-31-2010 at 02:06 PM.
But you are the one racializing this issue.
You are having at it.
You are the one who hates black people because one yelled at you at a gas station.
That's a manufactured talking point, and is itself an overused talking point of the Right.
Mostly by people who doth protest too much, it seems.
The Tea Party would disagree.
They obviously protest too much.
See, that's the reason you quit reading; I have no idea with what you're ascribing my assent or dissent.
My post was pointing out the hypocrisy of the left-wing talking point that whomever disagrees with Obama's agenda is a racist simply because he's a black man.
Similarly, there are apparently a group of black people who are pissed that Clinton tried to get Meeks to drop out of the race, ostensibly because they believe he did it due to Meeks' race.
I think the whole racialization of politics is a Democrat/liberal phenomenon. Y'all have at it...
Oh, and nice comeback on the
I invite you to ignore my posts. I've never asked anyone in here to read what I post. But, in the time I've been posting here, I dare say my input has stirred more response, debate, and general forum activity than has yours.
Cheers!
Even your hangman vs. popcorn post had a certain juvenile, elementary-school air about it.I think the
Yet you are continuing to make this about race..
No, I continue to make the assertion, Democrats and liberals are making this about race.
I don't think anyone's ever said there is racism in the Tea Party because they disagree with the President. I think people have suggested there are racists in the Tea Party because some of them make signs like this:
No reasonable person has ever said every Tea Partier is racist.
I won't argue the first image could be construed as racist but, it could also be a reference to the backassward health care reform that is the keystone of his domestic policy.I don't think anyone's ever said there is racism in the Tea Party because they disagree with the President. I think people have suggested there are racists in the Tea Party because some of them make signs like this:
No reasonable person has ever said every Tea Partier is racist.
The second image is a commentary on Obama's racism. Some believe he has a grudge against white people.
I guess that would depend on your definition of "reasonable." There are many liberal pundits that have suggested just that.
So they, like you, make it about race.
yonifail?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
