Eva: Tony Parker wants to play in Big Apple

[z0sa]

Lefty gets y owned

[Bukefal]

[lefty]

Lefty gets y owned

Are you mad at me because I owned you in the MLB forum ?


Rangers

[TJastal]

Fail.

Technically, what I said is true, DesignatedT. The spurs did play better basketball while Parker was out the lineup the past two years.

with Parker 79-49, 61% games won
without Parker 25-11, 69% games won

Statistics don't lie.

However. It does appear Tony Parker's focus is back on the spurs (for now anyway), and not on averaging 25ppg or playing for France or getting max contracts with the big markets or partying with Eva in New York & LA (well maybe a little partying here n there)

So as a result I'm expecting a better Tony Parker this year and so far things look pretty hopeful.

[ducks]

Are you mad at me because I owned you in the MLB forum ?


Rangers

I called rangers vs giants
owned everyone there

no one thought the giants would get that many hits in the world series

[ohmwrecker]

Wtf
You are the tiest poster here

You're just jealous . . . I get it.

[ohmwrecker]

Technically, what I said is true, DesignatedT. The spurs did play better basketball while Parker was out the lineup the past two years.

You keep forgetting to mention the key component in this equation . . . Manu Ginobili.

[lefty]

I called rangers vs giants
owned everyone there

no one thought the giants would get that many hits in the world series

I did

[TJastal]

You keep forgetting to mention the key component in this equation . . . Manu Ginobili.

What equation are you babbling about?

[ohmwrecker]

What equation are you babbling about?

Your idiotic assumption that George Hill is a better PG than Tony Parker because the Spurs (all of them, but especially Manu) happened to step up when TP was injured.

[lefty]

Your idiotic assumption that George Hill is a better PG than Tony Parker because the Spurs (all of them, but especially Manu) happened to step up when TP was injured.

The Spurs did play better when TP was injured

[ohmwrecker]

The Spurs did play better when TP was injured

Yes, they did, but not for the falsehood TJ is trying to propagate.

[lefty]

Yes, they did, but not for the falsehood TJ is trying to propagate.

ah ok

[TJastal]

Yes, they did, but not for the falsehood TJ is trying to propagate.

Dude, your reading too much into this. Think, 'Occam's razor'. I'm not trying to propagate anything on anyone, just crunched a few numbers to defend myself.

[ohmwrecker]

Dude, your reading too much into this. Think, 'Occam's razor'. I'm not trying to propagate anything on anyone, just crunched a few numbers to defend myself.

lol Occam's razor

Dude, the simplest (and correct) explanation is that the Spurs TEAM rallied when their starting PG went out and it happened to coincide with Manu getting healthy and having one of the best last third seasons of his career.

George Hill deserves credit, but not as the heir apparent to the PG position. He solidified that he is far from it in the Phoenix series. Tony, faults and all, is the best PG of the two and for the Spurs.

[TJastal]

lol Occam's razor

Dude, the simplest (and correct) explanation is that the Spurs TEAM rallied when their starting PG went out and it happened to coincide with Manu getting healthy and having one of the best last third seasons of his career.

You can use whatever explanations and equations you want, but it still doesn't change the fact that the spurs played significantly better in 2008 & 2009 when Parker was out missing games for various reasons. It really doesn't get any simpler than that. Maybe you should go look up the defenition of Occam's razor.

George Hill deserves credit, but not as the heir apparent to the PG position. He solidified that he is far from it in the Phoenix series. Tony, faults and all, is the best PG of the two and for the Spurs.

Well wonderful, glad you think so.