He''s short selling a lot of stocks so he'll announce he's not doing and then rake in the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I think you pretty much covered it in your other post.
might as well make a new thread
Any thoughts on the upcoming Fed decision post-election tomorrow of what they will do regarding inflation and purchasing securities?
He''s short selling a lot of stocks so he'll announce he's not doing and then rake in the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I think you pretty much covered it in your other post.
Yeah but I want as many responses as possible figured it might get overlooked by most in that voting thread
Here is what I said earlier:
Not a clue.
If investment bankers don't get their tax cut, then we all lose.
Yep. Can't say I have anything meaningful to add to the rest of your take, though here's one possibility you left out: that whatever amount the Fed does spend won't be enough to countervail deflation pressures.
"What is truly sad to take from all this is that it seems more than ever, that an unelected elite rich cadre of bankers and their spokesperson have far, far, far more influence over the direction of our country at this point in time than EVER before."
You haven't been paying attention, AT ALL.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/30d18d7a-e...44feab49a.htmlBrent crude oil could rise above $90 a barrel before the end of the year if the Federal Reserve announces a new asset purchase programme of $500bn or more, says Francisco Blanch, global head of commodity research at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
He believes the perception that more quan ative easing from the Fed has been fully priced in by commodity markets is misleading. “We believe oil is only starting to reflect current dollar weakness, leaving room for oil prices to rise as emerging market currencies strengthen.”
..
Last edited by Cant_Be_Faded; 11-03-2010 at 08:29 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)