Reply With Quote
Weird how the New York Times has no moral dillemma about publishing this , but wouldn't publish the climategate emails because they were "stolen".
Just curious. I know how outraged libs were about Valerie Plame -- so much so that there's even a ty movie being made about it. How do these same folks feel about this Wikileaks nitwit?
Weird how the New York Times has no moral dillemma about publishing this , but wouldn't publish the climategate emails because they were "stolen".
is the wiggyleeks guy a member of the white house staff?
was he a hero before this?
Fat, Dumb, Screwed, Diseased America Can't Handle The Truth (and most don't care, and couldn't tell reality from fantasy, anyway. aka, perfect robotic consumers and suckers).
Much better to lie to them with corporate/political fantasies.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-29-2010 at 01:11 PM.
No YouTube?
DarrinS finally found out that Youtube is a product of the left.
How true...
About it being a product of the left.
Ever notice how often a youtube that attacks the left gets removed?
I sometimes use youtube, but I usually have fun with stuff like this:
And reminiscing:
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 11-29-2010 at 04:10 PM.
This guy was never anyone's hero. I think he should be tried for treason.
Sorry, the law doesn't work that when with the free press. My sentiments too though.
ing about Youtubes means you're just out of ideas.
Isn't that the truth.
i have an idea. since it's your thread, why don't you explain how this has anything to do with valerie.
I have an idea...
Valarie is a liberal loser, who used her job and position to discredit the sitting president. That is rather evil in my view, since it was based on a personal belief of hers rather than sound fact.
yep, she found out her sitting president and his staff were lying.
is that how someone becomes a liberal loser?
Just maybe the president discredited himself by fibbing in a SOTU address. Demonizing the Plames for revealing the fib instead of the President for telling it, sheds more light on you than it does on your target, WC.
No doubt GWB's artful phrasing was crafted to immunize him in advance against charges of mendacity, but the inference he meant us to draw from what " the British government has learned" was clearly deceptive.
yep, and their solution was to out a cia operative.
THIS.
Valerie put her life on the line for this country. And they outed her, endangering her life for political gain.
S'ok. She was just a liberal.
She should have respected the Office of the President like conservatives do.
She'd be in much greater danger if she drew a cartoon of Muhammed (PBOH). Her and her hubby don't have to fear for their lives.
i actually believe this is the best you can offer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
