BTW, it's "intents and purposes."
no.
For all intensive purposes, Bonner gets to minutes and this essentially wipes out Splitter's opportunity.
Bonner, seriously.
BTW, it's "intents and purposes."
No it isn't re .
you poor baby
I'm not speaking for my own benefit. I doubt many others want to read their sexual fantasies about me.
It's right, re !
you dream about their fantasies do you not
No.
Do you like reading their sexual fantasies involving me?
Lol Chumpdumper with no life, correcting every type of error known to ST. We all know how you got to those 50,000+ posts now.
Wait.
Are you saying it's an error now?
you used to be funny asking for links when others said something you disagree with
but now you do not even ask for links
you instead post sexual fantasies
which is stupid and gay
Re I am then.![]()
Lol extending your post count ever more by asking me a question.
Could you give me a link to a sexual fantasy that I originally posted?
Thanks in advance, ducks.
It might help if you bothered to answer it instead of simply retorting. Help keep Chumps post count down!!!!
No .
It's a yes or no question.
The question wasn't directed at you, ducks.
See, there's another post. This is what I have to deal with.
see I only have 14 thousand to post tonight to catch YOU
Um, good luck?
Like you think you're on to some hip saying or something. "Tough ", over and over. Just like your defend-everything-the-Spurs-do retorts.Tough .
Your whining has gotten out of hand.
How has it gotten out of hand? It was one complaint. If you didn't like my "whining", then you shouldn't have responded . . . repeatedly.
Nah, I've said what I have to say as far as that goes.You should go back to whining about me.
What is the cop out?
Please explain without whining.
Why would you feed the Chump?
Why won't you say whether you now consider "for all intensive purposes" an error?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)