Your .02 cents aren't worth much, especially if you think what your post implied. Chandler is the better player, all-around, which thus is the reason he starts.
Admittedly, I haven't seen any of the Mav games all year - just BSPN highlights. Based on their history and the Mavs' need for size at the center spot, Haywood should start. I believe that Chandler is a good weak side shot blocker, a good team defender, and he can catch/finish passes from J Kidd. That won't be good enough IMO. You guys should start Haywood to match up with frontlines that have beef in the middle.
The only reason I could see Chandler starting over Haywood would be due to health. Is Haywood healthy? Because if he is, he needs to start. Bring Chandler off the bench.
Just my 0.02.
Your .02 cents aren't worth much, especially if you think what your post implied. Chandler is the better player, all-around, which thus is the reason he starts.
Haywood <<< Chandler
If you even bothered watching most Mavs games, you'd know that Chandler is the single biggest reason the Mavs actually play good defense this season.
Watch the games before you post some wack ass like this. Haywood is the Mavs 3rd string center. Chandler has propelled himself to the best center in mavs history
You've never even seen Chandler then. Tyson Chandler towers over most centers.Based on their history and the Mavs' need for size at the center spot, Haywood should start.
Son, Haywood is a contract who sucks ing ass on Free throws and on offense in general.
You guys are stupid. I stated in my original post that I HAVE NOT WATCHED ANY MAV GAMES this year. Anyway, as a Laker fan, I'm glad he's starting because he can't check Pau or Bynum. And if Haywood ain't good enough to supplant Chandler as a starter y'all are ed with no Vaseline if you meet up with the champs in the playoffs.
Yeah, the mutha er is 7'1"! I wish we had him on our team.
great in analysis
![]()
tbh, your post is almost as useless as Haywood considering you havn't even seen a second of Mavs ball. Lol thinking Chandler blows when he is the primary reason why the Mavs are great in defense this year
tbh, just realized we're getting trolled.
nice brah
I'm deployed, so I can't watch any games yet. Point taken though.
then why make this ing thread? You just enjoy talking out of your ass?
I haven't watch any Laker games so I DEMAND TO KNOW WHY ARTEST IS STARTING OVER DEVIN EBANKS!!!!!!!!!
I haven't watched any laker games so why is Odom starting over Luke Walton?!!
Because PJ doesn't play rookies. Duh!![]()
have you guys never seen the OP post?..this is one of the best arguments I've ever seen him make
..
was kinda curious about that myself
You haven't watched a game, haven't seen how one player is playing over the other and yet you made this thread?![]()
Typical grey Laker fan talking basketball.
This is what happens when you opine based on NBA 2k11 instead of actually watching games. I bet Haywood has triple-doubles every game in his/her PS3.
What's funny about it? Based on their history is how I made it. When the Mavs 1st got Haywood they matched up really well with the Lakers. They beat them once or twice IIRC. Any team that had Tyson Chandler on it didn't see him "get off" on the Lakers on either side of the ball. Unless he was catching a lob from CP or weakside swatting, he wasn't worth . Despite his perceived improved play, he ain't doing against the Lakers, Celtics, or the Magic IMO. He's too light in the ass. And when Utah get's their together, he won't be much against them either unless J Kidd spoon feeds him.
At least with Haywood they have some beef to go against teams with elite bigs. Just wait until y'all play a team with a real center. You'll see. I'll be laughing then.
Chandler's by no means the defensive savior some Mavs fans make him out to be, but come on man...Haywood is a festering turd out there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)