Reply With Quote
Also, if you could show me FACTS that I do not watch the games I would appreciate it. I only deal with facts and things that can be backed up tangibly.
lol trying to troll me.
Being able to use other peoples "per the usual" but not statistical analysis
Also, if you could show me FACTS that I do not watch the games I would appreciate it. I only deal with facts and things that can be backed up tangibly.
lol trying to troll me.
Another terrible argument from you girl.
lol small>re ed
lol spur fan>re ed Mav fan
lol getting so mad, you need to chill bro.
Why are you getting so mad
Just relax, learn to:
This is completely false. Completely. I have already proven this with my arguments compared to yours. I used advanced metrics and facts. You have used nothing to disprove that at the time the argument was made that it was not close.
Until you can go into great detail and prove definitively with statistical evidence that at the the time the argument was made they were not close as players, I would appreciate it if you stopped breathing in my direction.
Statistically, Amare is clearly better than Bosh, but what seals the deal for me is imagining Bosh and Amare switching teams . . . Miami would be unarguably better, the Knicks would be about the same or worse.
That is true right now.
But what about the actual argument, which was that the players were comparable before this year.
At the moment, no. But I already said that, so again, you are a re . You fail to comprehend the most basic of arguments.
It's hard to say because Bosh has struggled as a third option, but I would give Stoudemire the edge in almost every scenario. Just my opinion. Bosh is a really good player, but Amare is a freak of nature. Sorry to throw a wrench in the works here.
Do you think they were comparable players talent wise, statistically and any other way you want to measure before this year? Bosh was never a 3rd option BEFORE THIS YEAR.
Players get better. Players mature. Situations change. There are many times where players are close, then one goes one way and one goes another.
You would know this if you watched games outside of the Mavs where all players stay the same.
Bosh put up better numbers, obviously, as the #1 option on the Raptors. Bosh is more skilled finesse player, but Amare is just a phenomenal athlete which, for me, is almost always preferable. Bosh might be slightly better defensively, but the separation isn't that wide.
So you are saying there were comparable at that time?
I know more about your team than you do, so don't bark up that tree unless you really feel like looking silly.
Making a joke is not the same as being serious, but for a re , that is apparently not self evident.
Me? Statistically, yes.
Woah, relax bro.You would know this if you watched games outside of the Mavs where all players stay the same.
I will break it down for you so you don't have to get upset.
I made a joke about the Mavs as noted in the first quoted phrase above.
You then said the Mav Krew is "pussy footed" because they say I'm awesome even though I talk about the Mavs in a way which is false.
I then said I clearly know more about the team you root for than you do and that my joke should not have been taken serious because it was in fact a joke.
You then became enraged because you could not grasp what happened and I explained it.
Ok. Thank you.
So you are saying Mav fans are re ed? I rarely ever talk bad about the Mavs unless it is a joke. I respect the Mavs. I hate them, but I respect them and give my honest opinion on them.
That is why they like me.
Now you are mad that your fanbase likes me more than you?
Let me guess, you don't care about that even though you brought it up unprovoked
Have you ever been wrong?
How can the Mav people respect you when you have been wrong? Because you didn't say you were mad at them for liking me because I wouldn't admit I was wrong (which my argument overall wasn't at the time, and I did admit Amare was better now, so again you are re ed), you said you can't understand how they can like someone who was wrong about something, which you said you yourself have been numerous times.
I can link to me saying Amare is better now. So again, you are wrong.
You didn't answer my question though.
My argument has been clear the whole time. When the argument was made I said I liked Bosh better but that the gap was small.
I now said Amare is better.
What about that is wrong? Please explain using facts and statistical analysis.
No, until you provide your factual, analytical based argument that disproves what I said (that the gap between the two was small), I will not continue to answer your questions.
Please also address this:
How can the Mav people respect you when you have been wrong? Because you didn't say you were mad at them for liking me because I wouldn't admit I was wrong (which my argument overall wasn't at the time, and I did admit Amare was better now, so again you are re ed), you said you can't understand how they can like someone who was wrong about something, which you said you yourself have been numerous times.
I cannot believe a fan base as proud as the Mavs would like someone who cannot make a legit argument but will go to such great lengths to call scoreboard on an argument that is not their own. Especially when they themselves have professed to be wrong numerous times and when the person they are arguing with admitted they were wrong about which player was better.
But you probably can't address that either.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
