Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 126 to 131 of 131
  1. #126
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    RG, what do you think of people who say that having children is immoral? After all, each child does more to cause pollution/spend resources etc. Do you think that's immoral when we already have trouble feeding the poor?
    I think that is nonsense.

    If one were to follow that to the extreme, the human race would simply cease to exist.

    Children are *the* only real important thing in the world, IMO.

    If one doesn't want to have kids, more power to them, and I don't think that is bad, merely a choice.

  2. #127
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    So many good questions and interesting points to make, so little time. Gotta go.

  3. #128
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    I think that is nonsense.

    If one were to follow that to the extreme, the human race would simply cease to exist.

    Children are *the* only real important thing in the world, IMO.

    If one doesn't want to have kids, more power to them, and I don't think that is bad, merely a choice.
    And if we were to follow your example to the extreme, we'd all be living in candle lit huts until every child had shelter and food. Right?

    Additionally, if you care about children, why would you bring another one into the world? Shouldn't you be using the resources you have now to take care of the children currently in existence?

  4. #129
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    I speak in the most absolute of terms, and as I have pointed out, don't really live up to those ideals either.

    As has been pointed out, once you have a certain amount of money beyond what is necessary to sustain life, you have more than hundreds of millions of people.

    If you choose to value hundreds of pairs of shoes over human beings, when you could simply do with a few, that is immoral.

    I would cast myself in with that. I could easily live a bit more simply, and donate or give more.

    That doesn't mean I don't recognize my own immorality.
    Well, I guess absolute values can lead to irrational conclusions...If I had a certain amount of money, regardless of whether it were enough to sustain life (whatever "sustain" is defined as at the time), I would likely have more than hundreds of millions of people.
    That metric...having more than others is rendered virtually meaningless by the simplest of extensions. However, it's the lynch-pin of the the scripture you quoted.

  5. #130
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    So many good questions and interesting points to make, so little time. Gotta go.

  6. #131
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399

    That doesn't mean I don't recognize my own immorality.
    Then everyone is immoral to some degree. In fact, it's human nature to acquire things. If you readily gave up all your stuff, you're pretty much admitting defeat in the "propagation of your DNA" contest, which is one of the most potent driving factors of all humanity.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •