Reply With Quote
Barea/Terry
/close
Orlando:
Jameer Nelson
Gilbert Arenas
Jason Richardson
JJ Red
Spurs:
Tony Parker
Manu Ginobili
George Hill
Gary Neal
James Anderson
Celtics:
Rajon Rondo
Ray Allen
Nate Robinson
Delonte West
Trailblazers:
Andre Miller
Brandon Roy
Rudy Fernandez
Which backcourt would you rather have?
Barea/Terry
/close
The Spurs, you have the MVP of the NBA, one of the best PG's in the NBA, Hill who is a good defender and was playing like a beast prior to his sprained toe, and finally Anderson who was playing great defense and shooting well prior to his injury.
Team USA 1992
Anderson played a total of 106 NBA minutes and you try to praise him for great defense and shooting
Anderson played a total of 106 NBA minutes and you try to praise him for great defense and shooting
He was shooting well and playing great defense, Anderson is the reason why the Mavericks wanted to move up in the draft to get him, it's just too bad the Spurs drafted him first and left you guys with that ty rookie Jones
re ed. This is not "Olympics best backcourt".Team USA 1992
I know
Still, USA 92
lol sample size
Just stop you idiot.Anderson is the reason why the Mavericks wanted to move up in the draft to get him, it's just too bad the Spurs drafted him first and left you guys with that ty rookie Jones
Mavs had Jones > Anderson pre Draft because they didnt want or need another jump shooter, they wanted the player type that Jones is.
Nice try.
lol sample size
Just stop you idiot.
Mavs had Jones > Anderson pre Draft because they didnt want or need another jump shooter, they wanted the player type that Jones is.
Nice try.
Anderson can drive it in, he shot 258 FT's in his final season at OSU, it's obvious you've never seen him play. He was the best shooter in college basketball though which is why you hear about his jump shooting so much.
258 FT's total in 33 games, 258/33=An average of 8 Free throws per game, he can pass, defend, shoot, drive it in, there is a reason he was the big 12 player of the year, the only way you could stop him was by doubling him, but even then that didn't work most of the time.
Who cares?
He is injuried, he has done in the NBA so far and Mavs never wanted him in first place.
the weakest set from that list is the Spurs.
From what we saw, yes.Anderson played a total of 106 NBA minutes and you try to praise him for great defense and shooting
Anderson > Jones, but that is besides the point.
LOL MVP of the NBA ...
Spurs by far, though. Magic and Blazers shouldnt even be on this list ...
and I must admit I have like George Hill sinc ethe Lakers were ready to draft him ...i think he and George Neal put them over the top.
the Magic backcourt has talent, but a lot of streaky players only thing reliable about them is Re s shooting and jrich's athleticism ...
Celts though not as deep is the only backcourt listed here that is in consideration for me but I would still choose Spurs.
James Anderson > Dominique Jones big time.
Spurs have the best backcourt and it's not even close.
Celtics have the best depth at PG in the NBA though.
Rajon Rondo/Nate Robinson/Delonte West/Avery Bradley
That's just dirty...
celtics, by far.
They wanted a DLeague player?
http://www.nba.com/dleague/playerfil....html?nav=page
ah, the typical morons appearing, DPG and Mel...
The weakest post in this thread is TheMACHINE'sthe weakest set from that list is the Spurs.
the weakest set from that list is the Spurs.
That "weak" backcourt is the reason the Spurs have the best record in the NBA
They're so good that Timmy D can average 14 and 10 and the Spurs can STILL win games.
They have the best record because the T-Pubs are too stupid
Wow this post was as transparent as your mom's breast implants, post with some substance sir!
The Spurs have a top 5 backcourt in NBA history right now. So this question is kind of silly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
