excellent stuff. Rosalind definitely did her homework. None of us have, by comparison.
excellent stuff. Rosalind definitely did her homework. None of us have, by comparison.
anyone watch this? That is willing to fess up?
Wow, an hour and 7 minutes? got the cliff note version?
Dindn't bother. Never seen anything credible on the topic, and don't expect too. You cried wolf far too many times.
Summarize a time index that's meaningful, and I'll give you my take.
cliff notes: watch the first 5-7 minutes and you will know whether you care to watch the rest or not.
Her knowledge and credibility comes across pretty quick.
You believe her right off the bat. Fine.
But you can't seriously believe you waving at the relevant authority carries any weight with us.
WC and Nbadan asked you nicely to summarize the youtube.
Can't you tell us the story in your own words? Not everybody has an a whole hour to waste in another patented Parker crapwagon thread.
Smart people can pull the wool over sheeples eyes like you easily.
Time index, summary, or screw it.
No . In your own words tells me you actually understand it. I ask people to do that on Global Warming topics, as I always explain in my words rather than using other people so much.
If you can't relate something competently to another person, in your own words, you haven learned it yet. Simple as that.
+1
Otherwise we simply have to assume you are trolling, only watched the first few minutes, and don't know about it, as is your normal M.O.
I noticed you started a whole new thread on the subject, rather than have the one where you got completely owned bumped repeatedly.![]()
so this is an Alex Jones project?
![]()
I looked up Rosalind Peterson and her Agriculture Defense Coalition website.
I'm not going say she's 100% a kook, but this is a poem she/they posted on their website:
lolSKY PILOTS FLYING ON HIGH - Author Unknown
“And who is here on the ground
Experimenting on your Weather from low and high?
And who’s around
Protecting Agriculture from Pilots in the Sky?
Republicans and Democrats in the Senate
Decide who gets the Water or the Sun.
They vote your Tax Dollars in the next minute>
They Decide who will Benefit…
And who will Starve by Loss of the Ton.
Which Sky Pilot is Flying across Our Land
Delivering changing Weather and Pollution…
While Dimming the Sun that touches our Trees and Crops…
And changing the Growing cycles upon which we depend?
And who is here on the ground sending chemicals
Into the air to pollute or change your Weather?
Does the Sky Pilot care about your Health,
The bees, trees, water pollution or crops…
Or is he paid to Change the Weather and Skies to Benefit another?
Whose Monetary Voice is Drifting across our Land
Renewed like Persistent Contrails in the air?
Who is Protecting our Air and Watersheds…
While Lobby Money takes Crop Production and Trees
Placing them on the Chopping Block?
Which Sky Pilot is making Man-made clouds today?
Who told him it was Safe?
Who gave him the Right without our Consent?
Who Hired him for these Missions on High?
Where is our deep blue skies and the Sun today...
To Kiss the ground and bring Life on Earth?
Why the haze that Obscures the Sun…
And why no Stars and Blue Skies on High?
Looking up in dismay,
We see no deep, clear Blue Skies today…
Only Persistent Contrails and White Haze,
Renewed by Sky Pilots each day.
It is us Here on the Ground
Rising up to say, “No more Experiments today!”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.agriculturedefensecoaliti...photosynthesis
..
Last edited by Blake; 01-04-2011 at 12:14 PM. Reason: double post
I swear, I am going to make up a pseudonym and start a conspiracy theory that NAMBLA is being targeted by the CIA and black helicopters, just to see AJ and company fall all over themselves asking why "the people in charge" are picking on them.
For fun: explain this air traffic over Austin in your spare time.
Nothing to explain. Planes cause contrails...
I'll bite anyway. My uncle used to work for the Airforce. He used to compile the maps of the earth surface in 3d. They would fly patterns like that for high resolution aerial photography.
Part of map making... Maps are constantly being updated.
Prove I'm wrong!
8 planes flew over this area in Austin. Shocking, I know.
Where is that house located in Austin, btw?
Just guessing, it's a flightpath. What's your explanation?
Chemtrails can be dangerous!
![]()
That view of downtown would be, by my guess would be the hills on the western side of town.
I have seen similar views in my drives in the southwestish part off Mopac. The picture appears to have been taken in the Bee Caves/Barton Creek Mall area.
From left to right in the picture would be pointing straight to the airport.
Given that contrails are known to form in humid cold air, we could safely assume the picture was likely taken either early spring, or mid-fall, especially since the trees still all seem to be green with leaves. I would say fall, were I to make a guess.
A west to east wind blowing across the approach/flight path to Austin Bergstrom would push the formed contrail clouds east in time for the next plane to land.
It is also possible that the picture was taken around the time of some sort of USAF formation flyover in honor of Veteran's day.
I would give the first explanation more probability as to being right.
How did I do?
EDIT
The contrails in Parkers picture go roughly north south, by the way, and that is directly the approach to the airport, as one of the main runways goes north south)
The picture given by Parker shows the obvious building in the lower right corner that is clearly visible in the picture below in the center left (low squat building with lots of vertical, parallel lines)
The above picture is taken on one of the upper floors of a hotel on the south side of the river, facing north.
Also notice the north/south contrail in the above picture as well.
Here is the URL for the airport showing the only two strips going north and south.
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&rl...ed=0CAQQtgMwAA
Last edited by RandomGuy; 01-04-2011 at 01:42 PM.
Something that takes much longer to explain with much less evidence or reason to fall back on, I'd presume.
Riverside/I-35, roughly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)