Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 67
  1. #26
    Hedo Layup Drill ShoogarBear's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    39,519
    It's an anomaly that Duncan was invisible, Dice was a DNP-CD, and Blair was the dominant big man on either side. You have to figure that in future matchups Duncan and Blair both regress to their means (along with Gasol), and Dice gets off the bench. So, despite Splitter being a relative nonfactor in this game, I think the key to a seven-game Laker series will still depend largely on whether the Spurs can get 15 effective MPG from him.

  2. #27
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    No problem.

    Derek Fisher D+
    Fish looked completely lost in this game. Swarmed by incredible defensive rotations, he finished with as many turnovers (3) as assists. On a night the Lakers desperately needed someone to hit shots, Fisher shied away from firing away, and after his 3rd quarter mini-meltdown against Richard Jefferson (which undoubtedly will inspire many a "U MAD?" poster), the Spurs put the Lakers away. 0 for 1 from downtown, Fisher looked old and out of sorts against San Antonio's speedy, slashing backcourt. Fisher was -21 in just 25 minutes of action, a performance that could see the Laker brass scrambling for potential trades to shore up their PG depth, of which they have little to speak of.

    Kobe Bryant F
    Kobe gets the worst grade out of any player from last night. He began by immediately taking 5 of his team's first 6 shots, and didn't pass the ball on any of those possessions, completely removing any offensive flow the Lakers had. His spat with George Hill, along with missing 13 shots in a row made it very apparent that the Spurs combination of Manu and Hill with a dash of RJ on switches got into his head. Obviously bothered by George Hill's length , Kobe did get warm in the 4th, when the game was already close to being over, and pulled the Lakers to within 9 before the Spurs scored the knockout punch. His 5 turnovers to go with just one assist is a microcosm of the Lakers right now -- Selfish, stat-hungry, and completely out of rhythm on offense. After all his time in the league, Kobe still hasn't made the mental commitment to playing team basketball, and he killed their momentum before it could ever get started last night.

    Ron Artest C-
    One rebound. That's all you need to know about his contribution to defense last night. Really, does anyone recall Artest even playing? Other than knocking down a couple of treys (the only player besides Kobe to hit more than one three), Artest was largely invisible in this showing. He gets a C- because he was one of only three Lakers to finish with 10+ points, and was the only Laker with significant minutes who didn't turn the ball over. He actually didn't get a tech this game, so that contributes to his (relatively) serene score below.

    "What about Bob?" rating: Chillin' on his shrink's couch, but needing a stress ball.

    Lamar Odom D
    The man who is usually a complete nightmare for the Spurs to guard, Odom shot 33% in this game. He did pull down 8 rebounds, but with both teams missing so much, that's not really as much to his credit. His hustle looked great at times, and at others he didn't even seem to want to be on the court. Overall, he wasn't nearly aggressive enough on either side of the ball. Odom gets a lower grade than usual because he HAS to demand the ball in games like this, as he presents perhaps the most difficult mismatch of anyone the Lakers have for the Spurs.

    Pau Gasol D
    Another player who gets a low grade due to the fact that he should be far more effective, Gasol continues his surprising lack of stellar play in the post for the Lakers. Be it from fatigue, injury, or just a lack of desire, Gasol's play as of late has to be highly disconcerting to the Lakers management. Gasol looked slow and hesitant all night, and got caught flat footed by the Spurs slashing guards, who blew by him early and often for easy points. He did finish with 3 blocks, however he wasn't closing plays out, and got completely smashed on the glass by DeJuan Blair. Harassed by help D and double teams, Gasol elected often to pass out of the post, something that will only give opposing bigs more confidence to force him into uncomfortable spots on the floor. The Lakers need to be patient and to repost Gasol, because if he isn't effective, they often must resort to Kobe's outside shot as their primary method of scoring.

    Steve Blake C-
    When the other team is actually happy to see you, that's usually a bad thing. Such was the case last night for Blake, who along with Fisher looked completely lost on offense, and couldn't guard a sack of potatoes on D. It stands to question that in the heat of the undoubtedly tough Western Conference Playoffs this year, will Phil ever feel comfortable putting Blake into the game? "Alright Steve, get out there and guard Deron. Steve? o?" "He fainted, coach." "Oh." The Lakers are going to struggle to get anything from this position in the playoffs unless Fisher is hitting his shots. Why the C-? Well, what were you expecting from Steve Blake?

    Shannon Brown C-
    I wanted to give Shannon an F, due to his 1-11 shooting. But did anyone notice that he also outrebounded every other Laker? In a minute less than Bynum, the 6'4" guard from Illinois pulled in 11 boards. For comparison, in 34 minutes Gasol had five rebounds. However, Shannon just couldn't hit a jumper in this game, and if you're a scorer on your team and you don't score, you're hurting the team. Phil should seriously consider starting Shannon Brown at PF instead of Gasol, just to send a message loud and clear to his struggling star. Phil could even borrow a jersey from Sir Charles to really drive the message home that a 6'4" guy shouldn't be kicking Pau's ass, even if they're on the same team.

    Matt Barnes B+
    I actually liked what I saw from Barnes, in the limited minutes (17) he played. He came with intensity on defense, and looked much more active than most Lakers. He drove into the paint and hit a couple of tough shots against the San Antonio defense. I can't understand why Phil didn't reward him with more playing time, because aside from Bynum, Barnes was one of L.A.'s positive influences last night on both sides of the court. In fact, every time I see this guy he seems to be consistently doing good things for L.A., making me wonder why he's relegated so often to the end of the bench.

    Andrew Bynum A-
    Really, how could you ask much more of this guy? He hit all 4 of the shots he took. He attacked on offense. He had nearly as many boards as Odom and Gasol in far fewer minutes. Phil says he's a step slow and so he's not playing him as much, but if anything I thought he was much more assertive at rotating to the ball than Gasol was last night. Bynum gets docked to an A because he only had one foul, meaning he should have been more aggressive, and down to an A- because of his Shaq-like line at the stripe: 2-8, the only Laker to miss from the free throw line, yet because of his struggles the team shot a collective 16-22. Yikes. Popovich is undoubtedly rubbing his hands, plotting in the playoffs to go with his vaunted, "Hack-a-Bynum" strategy, or perhaps the less well-known "Chop-a-Drew". Also of note, high school BBall coaches everywhere are busting their clipboards as their players think, "Wow, I can make it to the NBA without ever learning to shoot free throws!"

    Derrick Caracter, Joe Smith, and Luke Walton: B+
    Managing just 3 minutes between them (well, all allotted to a guy that I didn't even know played for the Lakers in Caracter), the trio of unsung superstars actually didn't do anything to hurt the Lakers last night. Caracter had 5 points in 3 minutes of play even, proving he's already a more effective scorer than Kobe.

    Phil Jackson D-
    Really, I'm not sure I can give Phil a grade for this game, because it was obvious as soon as the game started that #24 was the one in control of the Lakeshow. Still, Phil should be heavily critiqued for his coaching job last night. Failing to throw an early reign on Bryant, he let Bean single-handedly destroy any offensive rhythm the Lakers might have had, then didn't play the guys who actually seemed like they wanted to be on the court. More PT to Barnes and Bynum, and the Lakers might have kept the lead to single digits and had a shot in the 4th. Phil was completely outcoached by Popovich here, as his team could not deal with the frenetic speed and rotating D the Spurs used all night to frustrate and confuse the Lakers starters.


    EDIT: Changed Barnes from B- to a B+, added some content.

  3. #28
    Veteran silverblackfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    2,083
    Thanks! Was beginning to wonder if anyone was going to read it.
    Felt accurate to me.
    Barnes really was looking effective for a brief span. Good thing they didn't keep him in the game.

  4. #29
    from across the pond Anonymous Cowherd's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    690
    excellent stuff on the Lakers, except you've been harsh on Odom. He had a fairly good game, certainly better than Shannon Brown or Ron Artest.

  5. #30
    RIP whottt. slayermin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    5,011
    I was actually worried that Blair and Neal were going to stink up the joint after their first half efforts. But to their credit, both kept fighting and turned in nice performances.

    Splitter struggled and looked overmatched. But the effort was there. It's pretty clear that Bynum is gonna be a problem in future matchups. Man, I hope Splitter looks better next time around.

  6. #31
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019

    Derrick Caracter, Joe Smith, and Luke Walton: B+
    Managing just 3 minutes between them (well, all allotted to a guy that I didn't even know played for the Lakers in Caracter), the trio of unsung superstars actually didn't do anything to hurt the Lakers last night. Caracter had 5 points in 3 minutes of play even, proving he's already a more effective scorer than Kobe.


    here Havoc

  7. #32
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    This was indeed a wonderful win, chocked full of some stellar performances by various Spurs players. That said, it's hard for me to imagine the Spurs having long-term success against this Fakers team, with Duncan being a non-factor. As terrific as Blair was, and I certainly hope he can continue this trend of success, the Spurs will still need production of our their future HOF PF/C, if they face off against the Fakers in the playoffs.

  8. #33
    Chillin' like a villain... TampaDude's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    20,120
    The Spurs are a good team this season, playing at home they are expected to win always.

    It certainly isn't a good sign that the Lakers had various losing streaks, but it's only a regular season game. It's not a true measure about the Lakers and the Spurs can play better too.

    The NBA best record is impressive, thought the Celtics are probably still a better team - because the Spurs played most of their games at home.
    The Spurs and Celtics are the two best teams in the NBA right now. I know it's still early, but I'd love to see a Spurs-Celtics Finals. That would be EPIC!!!

  9. #34
    Veteran gameFACE's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    1,822
    Splitter was just given a taste of what he needs to contend with. This is what you were brought here for. He may not have done well but someone above said at least the effort was there and I agree. You have to throw the guy into the fire and see what you got.

  10. #35
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    It's an anomaly that Duncan was invisible, Dice was a DNP-CD, and Blair was the dominant big man on either side. You have to figure that in future matchups Duncan and Blair both regress to their means (along with Gasol), and Dice gets off the bench. So, despite Splitter being a relative nonfactor in this game, I think the key to a seven-game Laker series will still depend largely on whether the Spurs can get 15 effective MPG from him.
    That's probably not far off. But I think it would be a lot less necessary if Tim can remember how to shoot that 15-footer off the glass. He's got to be able to force those guys to respect that shot, to keep them from sagging to the restricted circle where they can gang bang him. Tim's lack of a top shelf game is already a big liability. When he is totally without that mid-range shot, he's a one trick pony. And I don't care how good he is at it, two competent big men in the middle are going to shut that down. Tony put the floater back into his game, and it makes a world of difference. Tim has to find his bank shot again - and the sooner the better.

    As far as I'm concerned, the Lakers side of things last night came down to one factor - Phil Jackson. It was obvious what his game plan was. He told his team that the Spurs didn't have anyone to match up with Kobe. They were going to come out hard, let Kobe establish his dominance, and the Spurs would fold like origami. And for a few minutes, it looked like he might be right. George Hill was exceptional, and the Spurs team defense was a beautiful thing. The guys are really beginning to trust each other, and with good reason.

    My biggest concern for this team is still the Big 3 playing loose and sloppy, and making bad decisions. Last night Tony tightened his act up, and it made a world of difference. (Make no mistake - he was awesome all night.) But Tim and Manu continued to throw the ball away, or at least throw possessions away with their poor passing.

    Some of our 3-point woes were just from poor shooting. But a lot of those misses were caused by poor passing. When a 3-point shooter has to lunge to corral the pass, and maybe has to put the ball on the floor once to keep from travelling, it gives the defenders a chance to close. It also forces the shooter to rush the shot, and maybe not get squared up. Sometimes it forces him to pass up what could have been a wide open look. At the very least, it forces them to shoot a slightly different shot than the one they have been lined up on for several seconds. It makes a huge difference, especially on long 3-pointers out on the arc. Tim and Manu were both terrible with their passes last night. There's no way to prove it, but I'm dead certain that we would have made more of those shots, and totally blown the Lakers out of the game, if the passing had been better.

    I'm also getting really sick of watching plays where Duncan gets a rebound, holds it for a second, then tosses a weak-ass little pass towards a guard, without even noticing that a defender is close by. Last night it didn't result in any turnovers, but that was sheer luck along with some hustle by our guards.

    Something is squirrelly with Manu's shooting mechanics. The ball rotation is off, and I swear there are times when he is letting the ball roll off his little finger. Some of the shots he's making I think he's pulled (looking at the stroke), and then they go through the net. That's not going to fix itself. I don't know if Chip Engellund can help him, because of his unorthodox style, but I sure hope he gets it fixed before Spring. A shooter needs to keep jacking up shots to work through a slump. But that doesn't work when the stroke isn't sound.

  11. #36
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Post Count
    130
    Wow a whole new level of basketball knowledge :
    Well, maybe you are a coach or something, but don't overestimate the rest..

  12. #37
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    This game showed how weak Lakers are at the point guard spot. Offensively Blake and Fisher are average but they are a disaster on the defensive end.

    The strategy of putting Bryant on Parker and hiding Fisher on a wing won't work as well as in the past because Bryant has slowed down and Spurs' wing are better offensively. Lakers can pack the paint but Spurs are shooting damn well this year. Parker could end up as a nightmare for Lakers in the playoffs because they don't really have an answer to stop him.

  13. #38
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    they don't really have an answer to stop him.
    It all depends on the Spurs can hitting their jump shots, unlike the 04 series where a very hot MvP-ish Tony vs MEM sweep found the Laker paint totally closed, and Malone -slapped Tim, while the Spurs couldn't buy a bucket.

    Tim is 6 years older now, so closing the paint again is all the Lakers have to do (as well as hitting their own shots)

  14. #39
    PRICELESS SPURS FAN polandprzem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    16,433
    This game showed how weak Lakers are at the point guard spot. Offensively Blake and Fisher are average but they are a disaster on the defensive end.

    The strategy of putting Bryant on Parker and hiding Fisher on a wing won't work as well as in the past because Bryant has slowed down and Spurs' wing are better offensively. Lakers can pack the paint but Spurs are shooting damn well this year. Parker could end up as a nightmare for Lakers in the playoffs because they don't really have an answer to stop him.
    The answer for LA was always to pack the paint and getting every possible rebound out of low % FG.

    This years spurs are different in a way that they create havoc and unpredictability - something I was pounding last year almost every Polands Perspective volume

  15. #40
    Ender's Teacher
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    441
    Thanks! Was beginning to wonder if anyone was going to read it.
    I thought it was good too. Amusing

  16. #41
    Lol Crews jjktkk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    6,420
    Ginobili's grade his a little bit too high (B/B+)
    This season, he is our MVP and I expect more from him.
    A true MVP finds other ways to help his team win, when his scoring is off. And thats exactly what Ginoboli did last night.

  17. #42
    Lol Crews jjktkk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    6,420
    This game showed how weak Lakers are at the point guard spot. Offensively Blake and Fisher are average but they are a disaster on the defensive end.

    The strategy of putting Bryant on Parker and hiding Fisher on a wing won't work as well as in the past because Bryant has slowed down and Spurs' wing are better offensively. Lakers can pack the paint but Spurs are shooting damn well this year. Parker could end up as a nightmare for Lakers in the playoffs because they don't really have an answer to stop him.
    +1. I've pointed this out in another post that everybody points out the Lakers immense size advatange against the Spurs, and that is true, but no one really mentions that the Spurs overall guard depth will give the Lakers headaches.

  18. #43
    The OL' Perfessor wildbill2u's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    8,641
    The important thing is that we have guys ready to step in and step up their play when some of our Big 3 struggle. Like the Spartan phalanx, when a man goes down, another smoothly stepped forward to take his place in the shield wall due to their discipline.

    Not only do we have good reserves, Pop is developing them with the confidence to step in and compete at a high level for extended minutes.

  19. #44
    Veteran Manufan909's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,049
    No problem.

    Derek Fisher D+
    Fish looked completely lost in this game. Swarmed by incredible defensive rotations, he finished with as many turnovers (3) as assists. On a night the Lakers desperately needed someone to hit shots, Fisher shied away from firing away, and after his 3rd quarter mini-meltdown against Richard Jefferson (which undoubtedly will inspire many a "U MAD?" poster), the Spurs put the Lakers away. 0 for 1 from downtown, Fisher looked old and out of sorts against San Antonio's speedy, slashing backcourt. Fisher was -21 in just 25 minutes of action, a performance that could see the Laker brass scrambling for potential trades to shore up their PG depth, of which they have little to speak of.

    Kobe Bryant F
    Kobe gets the worst grade out of any player from last night. He began by immediately taking 5 of his team's first 6 shots, and didn't pass the ball on any of those possessions, completely removing any offensive flow the Lakers had. His spat with George Hill, along with missing 13 shots in a row made it very apparent that the Spurs combination of Manu and Hill with a dash of RJ on switches got into his head. Obviously bothered by George Hill's length , Kobe did get warm in the 4th, when the game was already close to being over, and pulled the Lakers to within 9 before the Spurs scored the knockout punch. His 5 turnovers to go with just one assist is a microcosm of the Lakers right now -- Selfish, stat-hungry, and completely out of rhythm on offense. After all his time in the league, Kobe still hasn't made the mental commitment to playing team basketball, and he killed their momentum before it could ever get started last night.

    Ron Artest C-
    One rebound. That's all you need to know about his contribution to defense last night. Really, does anyone recall Artest even playing? Other than knocking down a couple of treys (the only player besides Kobe to hit more than one three), Artest was largely invisible in this showing. He gets a C- because he was one of only three Lakers to finish with 10+ points, and was the only Laker with significant minutes who didn't turn the ball over. He actually didn't get a tech this game, so that contributes to his (relatively) serene score below.

    "What about Bob?" rating: Chillin' on his shrink's couch, but needing a stress ball.

    Lamar Odom D
    The man who is usually a complete nightmare for the Spurs to guard, Odom shot 33% in this game. He did pull down 8 rebounds, but with both teams missing so much, that's not really as much to his credit. His hustle looked great at times, and at others he didn't even seem to want to be on the court. Overall, he wasn't nearly aggressive enough on either side of the ball. Odom gets a lower grade than usual because he HAS to demand the ball in games like this, as he presents perhaps the most difficult mismatch of anyone the Lakers have for the Spurs.

    Pau Gasol D
    Another player who gets a low grade due to the fact that he should be far more effective, Gasol continues his surprising lack of stellar play in the post for the Lakers. Be it from fatigue, injury, or just a lack of desire, Gasol's play as of late has to be highly disconcerting to the Lakers management. Gasol looked slow and hesitant all night, and got caught flat footed by the Spurs slashing guards, who blew by him early and often for easy points. He did finish with 3 blocks, however he wasn't closing plays out, and got completely smashed on the glass by DeJuan Blair. Harassed by help D and double teams, Gasol elected often to pass out of the post, something that will only give opposing bigs more confidence to force him into uncomfortable spots on the floor. The Lakers need to be patient and to repost Gasol, because if he isn't effective, they often must resort to Kobe's outside shot as their primary method of scoring.

    Steve Blake C-
    When the other team is actually happy to see you, that's usually a bad thing. Such was the case last night for Blake, who along with Fisher looked completely lost on offense, and couldn't guard a sack of potatoes on D. It stands to question that in the heat of the undoubtedly tough Western Conference Playoffs this year, will Phil ever feel comfortable putting Blake into the game? "Alright Steve, get out there and guard Deron. Steve? o?" "He fainted, coach." "Oh." The Lakers are going to struggle to get anything from this position in the playoffs unless Fisher is hitting his shots. Why the C-? Well, what were you expecting from Steve Blake?

    Shannon Brown C-
    I wanted to give Shannon an F, due to his 1-11 shooting. But did anyone notice that he also outrebounded every other Laker? In a minute less than Bynum, the 6'4" guard from Illinois pulled in 11 boards. For comparison, in 34 minutes Gasol had five rebounds. However, Shannon just couldn't hit a jumper in this game, and if you're a scorer on your team and you don't score, you're hurting the team. Phil should seriously consider starting Shannon Brown at PF instead of Gasol, just to send a message loud and clear to his struggling star. Phil could even borrow a jersey from Sir Charles to really drive the message home that a 6'4" guy shouldn't be kicking Pau's ass, even if they're on the same team.

    Matt Barnes B+
    I actually liked what I saw from Barnes, in the limited minutes (17) he played. He came with intensity on defense, and looked much more active than most Lakers. He drove into the paint and hit a couple of tough shots against the San Antonio defense. I can't understand why Phil didn't reward him with more playing time, because aside from Bynum, Barnes was one of L.A.'s positive influences last night on both sides of the court. In fact, every time I see this guy he seems to be consistently doing good things for L.A., making me wonder why he's relegated so often to the end of the bench.

    Andrew Bynum A-
    Really, how could you ask much more of this guy? He hit all 4 of the shots he took. He attacked on offense. He had nearly as many boards as Odom and Gasol in far fewer minutes. Phil says he's a step slow and so he's not playing him as much, but if anything I thought he was much more assertive at rotating to the ball than Gasol was last night. Bynum gets docked to an A because he only had one foul, meaning he should have been more aggressive, and down to an A- because of his Shaq-like line at the stripe: 2-8, the only Laker to miss from the free throw line, yet because of his struggles the team shot a collective 16-22. Yikes. Popovich is undoubtedly rubbing his hands, plotting in the playoffs to go with his vaunted, "Hack-a-Bynum" strategy, or perhaps the less well-known "Chop-a-Drew". Also of note, high school BBall coaches everywhere are busting their clipboards as their players think, "Wow, I can make it to the NBA without ever learning to shoot free throws!"

    Derrick Caracter, Joe Smith, and Luke Walton: B+
    Managing just 3 minutes between them (well, all allotted to a guy that I didn't even know played for the Lakers in Caracter), the trio of unsung superstars actually didn't do anything to hurt the Lakers last night. Caracter had 5 points in 3 minutes of play even, proving he's already a more effective scorer than Kobe.

    Phil Jackson D-
    Really, I'm not sure I can give Phil a grade for this game, because it was obvious as soon as the game started that #24 was the one in control of the Lakeshow. Still, Phil should be heavily critiqued for his coaching job last night. Failing to throw an early reign on Bryant, he let Bean single-handedly destroy any offensive rhythm the Lakers might have had, then didn't play the guys who actually seemed like they wanted to be on the court. More PT to Barnes and Bynum, and the Lakers might have kept the lead to single digits and had a shot in the 4th. Phil was completely outcoached by Popovich here, as his team could not deal with the frenetic speed and rotating D the Spurs used all night to frustrate and confuse the Lakers starters.


    EDIT: Changed Barnes from B- to a B+, added some content.
    ing awesome, man! You should really think about doing quick grades for the opposing team more often, you have untapped potential.

  20. #45
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    [SIZE="5"]
    Tiago Splitter C
    When Tiago Splitter signed, his ability to help negate the Lakers size advantage was hyped. In the first go-around, it didn’t really work out as planned. He had trouble scoring or rebounding against the length. On the post, the Lakers were most comfortable when Splitter was on the court. Splitter had a couple nice plays but it was mostly a night to forget for the big Brazilian.
    timvp liked your recap grades but disagree on Splitter.
    I thought at least two of the fouls called on Splitter were pure b.s. calls, the ones we are used to the Fakers being gifted. I hope this is not a disturbing trend which will render Splitter ineffective vs the Lackers, but it is a thought and certainly part of the fabric of Laker *winning* ways.

    Splitters 1st shot attempt was an obvious Flagrant on Bynum. Bynums clotheline swipe of Splitters neck did not come within a foot of the basketball. Not even a remote attempt by Bynum to get the ball.
    After the fts, very next trip back on D.....

    Foul call #1:
    Bon Bon tries to front Gasoft and ball is passed right over Bonny to Gasoft 5 ft from the rim. So Splitter leaves his man to give weakside help guarding the rim. Sure looks like Splitter got all ball and/or hand (and since "hand is part of the ball") on a seemingly clean block by Splitter which caused Gasoft to lose the ball to Ginobili. Tweet! Splitter is introduced to "Laker reffing" a mere 60 seconds into his Spurs V Lakers career!

    Foul 2
    Score 27-19. Simple battle for position with Bynum and Splitter doing the NBA big dance where offensive guy tries to bump defender by sticking his ass into his midsection and Splitter thrusts back. (try not to get too turned on board s) Good No call made, they seperate. Now Bynum tries to shuffle into the lane and does shuffle right into Splitter who apprears completely set. Tweet! foul on Splitter for impedeing. Whatever...

    Foul #3:
    27-24. After a sweet assed block of Gasol, Splitter gets trying to stop Gasol from catching a pass down the middle of the lane by having his left hand around Gasofts waste. Bad D by Splitter, good call.

    Foul 4 was in garbage time I dont even recall.

    So while maybe a C is appropriate, some real fertilizer reffing offset Splitters debut vs Fakerville. I like the disruptions Splitter makes on D.

  21. #46
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    Watched the game at a sports bar in LA, must admit, couldn't follow the game that closely, too much going on. Thanks for the recap.

  22. #47
    Believe. Cessation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Post Count
    2,896
    Yes, those were fair grades for the lakers.

  23. #48
    Lab Animal Capt Bringdown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    11,443
    Looking at the 12/22 Denver game, Splitter was cutting to the basket and benefiting from some nifty Parker passes off of penetration. I know the Lakers have historically shut down Parker in the lane, but last night showed that that tactic may not be effective this year.

    At any rate, it's clear Splitter is better at cutting to the basket than posting up. I hope the Spurs continue to work this angle as the season rolls on.

    I'd have to re-watch the tape, but Splitter's touches were from post ups in the Laker game?

  24. #49
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    It's been obvious for many many years that Phil has never had control of his team. The all star always runs the show, Phil just makes suggestions in a fortune cookie way.

    I have mixed feelings about the "keep shooting" approach. I favor it heavily, but many will attack someone who keeps shooting with poor results.

    Obviously Kobe didn't get the rest of the team involved, but he did keep shooting. Had he been hitting, we would have been in trouble.

    So, there's a difference between "keep taking the open look" and "keep forcing the ball up there contested, screw the team". The 2nd was Kobe's approach. He was miffed at the team, and it showed. They played much differently tonight and the results reflect that.

  25. #50
    Spurs fan from Hong Kong team-work's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    496
    Quick Grades: Spurs vs. Lakers
    Tim Duncan D
    If you told me before the game that Tim Duncan would score two points and pull down four rebounds on 1-for-7 shooting in 29 minutes, I’d ask how many points the Lakers won by. Thankfully, the Spurs were able to overcome Duncan’s difficult night. They did so by basically going away from him and limiting his touches. Duncan simply couldn’t do anything against the length of the Lakers on the offensive end. Defensively, he was better. He defended the post well, played good team defense and ran the court. However, his lack of defensive boards wasn’t helping matters.
    From the context, it seems Duncan is healthy at least. And that is reassuring despite his recent slump.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •