Reply With Quote
Pop broke his ing toe, told him to straighten up or he breaks another.
Interesting that at the beginning of the season, it was generally agreed that GHill was not playing well. Interesting in how his continually improving play has made a marked difference on the overall team defense.
First 15 games (13-2) = 6 100+ points by opponents, 17th ranked scoring defense (GHill 9 ppg, 44% fga, 32% 3pa)
Next 18 games (16-2) = 6 100+ points by opponents (4 of which when GHill was out with his toe injury), 10th ranked scoring defense. (13 ppg, 51% fga, 51% 3pa)
Last 4 games (4-0) after GHill came back = opponents scoring 82.5 points per game. But, they are only averaging 98 points a game, over 7 points below their season average.
This stretch of games before the next Dallas rematch should be interesting:
Up-tempo with NY and Minny, but slowing it down against BOS, IND and MIL. I'm actually more comfortable with the up-tempo matchups than I am against the grind it out teams. Not sure that they have a consistent interior presence yet to close out those low scoring games.
Pop broke his ing toe, told him to straighten up or he breaks another.
I liked the last four wins.
Werd george hill looked like the warden out there with that lock up d these past few games
His help defense is very impressive. He seems to be one step ahead of the offense. And he recovers quickly enough so as not to get burned. And I see a lot of Bowen's techniques in HIll,obviously he was paying attention when Bowen played with him.
George's reach is deceptively long. His reach fooled Kobe a few times.
Obviously Bowen was a better defensive player one on one but Hill's help defense is better.He has the quickness and the speed to recover that Bowen hadn't.Hill is everywhere
They are pretty different.Bowen was on his man like a shadow all the time.He was the best doing that.
He has made our team defense better since coming back but I still consider his individual defense against the Lakers to be a fluke until he proves me otherwise.
On the fence about his individual defense overall.
Figured I'd throw this out there instead of starting a new topic..
Spurs are now tenth in the league in points allowed. 14th in opponent FG percentage.
Both promising signs. I think if we can crack top 5 in each, things will better looking towards the playoffs.
It seems to be locked in at times and not so good other times, but the biggest flaw I see is his inability to fight through screens sometimes. You gotta be great at this to be a truly talented lock-down defender. That said, I'll agree his help D has been good this year.
Last 5 games, even with the Orlando debacle 4th in points allowed and 2nd in opp FG %. It may be coming around.
Y'know, all this talk about which Spur should be an All-Star, should Manu be in the MVP discussion, etc.
If you think about it, the only Spurs who should be frontrunners in the discussion for awards are Pop for COY and Hill for Sixth Man.
I'm still mad at him for the Suns series.
Crazy talk....
What about Duncan for DPOY?
+1
I know it is harsh...but he really the bed against the suns and it will take a very strong showing IN THE PLAYOFFS for Hill to erase that stigma...
If Duncan couldn't win it when he was the foundation of the unquestioned best defense in the league, no way he wins it now that his skills have diminished some and the Spurs defense is no longer the best.
He played badly in games 1 and 3 and decent in games 2 and 4. He was awesome in the latter half of the Mavs series...we don't win game 6 and definitely not game 4 without him. IMO, he's already shown he's a playoff performer.
http://espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/tea...ff/order/false
Spurs are actually 7th in the league in defense when using the metric of points against per 100 possessions and not that far from the 3-6 teams.
If Spurs move into the top 5 in these metrics they will be fine going forward.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
