If you read and really processed what was being said in this thread, instead of defensively lashing out because of a few key words, you would see that what we're actually saying is that this incident, regardless the shooter's exact motivations or leanings, does/can/should highlight the potential dangers in ANY political organization relying upon/encouraging the use of violent imagery and rhetoric in their political campaigning. In light of what happened yesterday, and removing any implication of blame from the equation, do you honestly think it's wise to discuss political victory in terms of reloading and taking aim?