Reply With Quote
NB= f
come on Culby you know is funny, have some sense of humor don't be so serious
NB
7/7 ecstasy...
please don't bring this weak ..... there's a collection of youtube faker videos out there remember kings series lol..... .04 sec.... lol.... a lot of bull out there... even stern declaring crap about how convenient are the fakers for the league wearing purple ties lol
Donaghy rigged an important playoff game in the Spurs favor. Those facts, they burn.
you forgot the collusion, Jerry West, the Grizzlies etc,etc, etc
.....and the closing of The Forum.
Giuseppe
I am disappointed that the NBA looked at the letter of the rule and not the spirit of the rule. I admit I stepped on the court, and that I should have had some more restraint, but Tim Duncan did the same thing but just not in such an aggressive manner. The rules are the rules, and I abide by them, and in that same vein, I think it would be beneficial for the league then to have also taken a further look at Tim Duncan, Stoudemire said.
Stu Jackson/Donaghy = Spurs fan
2007*
True ....
Blessings x 21
Stern=Lakers
I am disappointed that the NBA looked at the letter of the rule and not the spirit of the rule. I admit I stepped on the court, and that I should have had some more restraint, but Tim Duncan did the same thing but just not in such an aggressive manner. The rules are the rules, and I abide by them, and in that same vein, I think it would be beneficial for the league then to have also taken a further look at Tim Duncan, Stoudemire said.
I am disappointed that the NBA looked at the letter of the rule and not the spirit of the rule. I admit I stepped on the court, and that I should have had some more restraint, but Tim Duncan did the same thing but just not in such an aggressive manner. The rules are the rules, and I abide by them, and in that same vein, I think it would be beneficial for the league then to have also taken a further look at Tim Duncan, Stoudemire said.
I am disappointed that the NBA looked at the letter of the rule and not the spirit of the rule. I admit I stepped on the court, and that I should have had some more restraint, but Tim Duncan did the same thing but just not in such an aggressive manner. The rules are the rules, and I abide by them, and in that same vein, I think it would be beneficial for the league then to have also taken a further look at Tim Duncan, Stoudemire said.
I am disappointed that the NBA looked at the letter of the rule and not the spirit of the rule. I admit I stepped on the court, and that I should have had some more restraint, but Tim Duncan did the same thing but just not in such an aggressive manner. The rules are the rules, and I abide by them, and in that same vein, I think it would be beneficial for the league then to have also taken a further look at Tim Duncan, Stoudemire said.
I am disappointed that the NBA looked at the letter of the rule and not the spirit of the rule. I admit I stepped on the court, and that I should have had some more restraint, but Tim Duncan did the same thing but just not in such an aggressive manner. The rules are the rules, and I abide by them, and in that same vein, I think it would be beneficial for the league then to have also taken a further look at Tim Duncan, Stoudemire said.
This is actually pretty stupid, tbh..
Bynum made contract with the ref, he deserves 2 Ts, those are the rules..preferential treatment, par/course..
Originally Posted by 21_Blessings
I am disappointed that the NBA looked at the letter of the rule and not the spirit of the rule. I admit I stepped on the court, and that I should have had some more restraint, but Tim Duncan did the same thing but just not in such an aggressive manner. The rules are the rules, and I abide by them, and in that same vein, I think it would be beneficial for the league then to have also taken a further look at Tim Duncan, Stoudemire said.
Stu Jackson/Donaghy = Spurs fan
2007*
I wonder what the contract said...
Serious inquiry here:::what does the above emoticon signify?
HH talked about preferential treatment in his post not too long after 21 made his post about you know, the same preferential treatment TD got when he should have been suspended for stepping on the court during a ruckus. Stat was spot on about TD - but of course the league turned a blind eye. Hypocritical, tbh, because if HH claims Bynum should have been suspended, then TD should have been suspended as well. Then the Spurs would have 2.61 les instead of 3.61 (1999=50/82=0.61; + 1 in 2003; + 1 in 2005; + 1 in 2007 = 3.61 les).
Truth.com
But you don't really care about the Spurs, right?Then the Spurs would have 2.61 les instead of 3.61 (1999=50/82=0.61; + 1 in 2003; + 1 in 2005; + 1 in 2007 = 3.61 les).
of course we care...we're not barbarians.But you don't really care about the Spurs, right?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
