Reply With Quote
Did he attack her in 2007?
since he was planning on attacking her since 2007
O
Did he attack her in 2007?
People are obsessed with Sarah Palin. That's about it.
blah ....wing-nuts will take her down before 2012 anyway because she can't win....
pitbull has endlessly promoted herself (her only skill), and has been promoted by the tea baggers, as a lover and promoter of guns, gun violence, targeting/scoping political opponents, and murdering animals for fun, a trailer-park trash version of Michael Vick.
She part of the America that adores guns and gun violence, guns and (political) murder as The Final Solution to whatever you hate.
Yeah, it couldn't possibly be this ing whack job that is responsible for this.
I bet you blame your parents for what a miserable person you are too.
This is the second time I've seen you misuse the term "murder."
People murder people.
Inanimate objects cannot murder people.
People cannot murder animals.
Inanimate objects cannot murder animals.
People murder people.
It's quite simple.
EDIT: Oh, and just to be sure, people cannot murder inanimate objects.
wtf do ppl keep on tuning into this clown?
The words "Sarah Palin" are the moonbat-signal for Dan and boutonski. If you ever want them around, just start a thread with her name in the le. They'll be there shortly.
This. The bitter people out there can't help but tie every single political happening to Palin.
We all hope she is the GOP stalwart in 2012.. In fact she would be a dream candidate for Obama..
If he's the Dems' candidate.
He will be darrins...
"tie every single political happening to Palin"
You Lie
Boner's bull bawling had nothing to with pitbull , only with his own emotional instability.
Believe it or not, his constant crying gets on my nerves too.
Three truths about this situation:
1. The guy who shot all those people is nutso; his violence and his choice of targets is not necessarily a direct response to the 'rhetorical violence' of the current political pundits in either party.
2. The rhetorical reliance on war imagery in current political debate cannot be helpful in any situation.
3. There are many victims from the Arizona tragedy. Sarah Palin is not one of them.Are you able to read the part that says "his violence and his choice of targets is not necessarily a direct resoponse to the 'rhetorical violence' of the current political pundits..."?
Last edited by EVAY; 01-11-2011 at 04:22 PM.
This is a red herring.
How often are war metaphors used in sports?
how many athletes have been gunned down for people using them?
Palin took a hit by just having her hitlist posted and seen by many who otherwise would not have seen it.
Zero, the same number of politicians that have been gunned down because of war metaphors?
Daily Kos website had a very similar graphic -- they are also not to blame for this psycho.
thats being debated. do you want to wait or would you prefer your current dog training?
Is it now? By whom?
fox news
I'm not sure they're equipped to debate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
