Reply With Quote
Yes. No questions. Melo doesn't have to confuse the Wolves by shooting like crap just so he can maybe do something different in the fourth quarter.
He also has no off the court drama like TP which really effects his game.
ofcourse spurs would have throw in splitter and some picks...
Yes. No questions. Melo doesn't have to confuse the Wolves by shooting like crap just so he can maybe do something different in the fourth quarter.
He also has no off the court drama like TP which really effects his game.
No. Melo would screw up the chemistry of this team and we'd have no true PG (George is a nice combo guard, not a PG yet, if he will ever be). Also, Melo is not that great a defender. I don't see how Melo fits the Spurs, and we don't need more scoring.
Wanna fight, DPG?
Nice knowing you Tony!
Yes. Hill is already better than TP, Hill is our future PG so might as well trade Parker now and get younger at that position. Manu is also a better PG than Parker so yah I'd be happy.
Tony Parker for the rights to Ricky Rubio.
Wolves aren't our Memphis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh please no.
if the trade included ducks, then definitely YES.
Who's gonna be our point guard? George Hill is the one defending the other team's best perimeter player so he's out of the question.
Do you think Melo will stay here for the long haul if he doesn't get his championship right away? him and his underachieving ass
No way. I would not trade Jefferson for Carmelo at this point. Dude is cancerous to his team.
yet to know imho. melo smokes weed and will probably turn another smokey after signing a luxurious contract i reckon
lol ducks owned....
Really? How about starting a 'trade Pop for George Karl' thread?
I don't think Melo would be a good fit in San Antonio.....
I saw we trade the big 3, Neal, the AT&T center, Splitter, our next 70 draft picks and everyone else on the team for Melo. Then we see if we can win.
To be quite honest, I probably would do the trade in the end.
However.
I am a big proponent of the idea that there are good players who are winners, and then there are just good players.
Tony Parker is a winner, Anthony in a sense, is not.
At least, that's how I see it.
Nah...no thanks. We are just fine at the SF position with RJ and TP is a one man fastbreak and without him the Spurs offense would suffer big time....
I think they would be happy for one reason only: You would become a Nuggets fan and off to Nugget land.
I think I saw an amber alert out for you. Did you call home today?
Melo don't have the will to win, or at least he hasn't found it yet.
What happened to your "future wife"?
People are still convinced that Parker isn't as good as he actually is. TP is a superb point-guard, just because he isn't extraordinary on offense every single game, doesn't mean he isn't one of the most valuable cogs in the Spur's system. He is faster than 3/4 of other point-guards in the league, and has such great court vision.
Don't get me wrong, Melo is a phenomenal player, but him and his thuggish at ude are meant for a team who gives a rat's ass. As for the Spurs, we're completely fine without him, & we're going to rape the team he ends up on anyways.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
