What I can't fathom is how you think something physically impossible, i.e. spraying chemicals targeted at the ground but doing it at 30,000 feet, is a conspiracy.
What I can't fathom is how you think something physically impossible, i.e. spraying chemicals targeted at the ground but doing it at 30,000 feet, is a conspiracy.
why watch an hour and half video? why can't you just quickly answer?
I'll help produce a fill out form for you:
Very, very, very simple and I bet it would take you less time to fill out this form than it did for you to imbed the youtube video.Type "what is being sprayed" here: _______________
Type "by who/whom" here: ________________
Type "the reason why" here _________________
I believe I made the point that spraying like that takes place with giant tankers at low level flights.
It is physically impossible to hit the ground with chemicals sprayed at 20-30,000 feet, in any concentration so as to affect anything.
Basically, any chemicals would simply freeze, become an ice cloud, then become dispersed by upper-atmosphere water vapor (which is what the "chemtrails" are.
If you want to claim that "chemtrails" are somehow chemical weapons, feel free to learn the physics and metrology required to write a paper on it, and prove all them no-nuthin' scientists wrong.
Is it possible the behavior of contrails is different today for some reason other than secret government programs to spray some form of "mind-control" chemicals?
Several plausible explanations have been put forth that do not require massive conspiracies.
Is it possible that contrails have not changed in 35 years, but your perception of them has?
Human memory is consistantly proven quite fallible, and I find it difficult to believe that you were really all that aware of contrails at the age of 20-
This theory is not only NOT bulletproof, it doesn't even meet the vaguest standards of common sense.
The only way to really believe it is to be consciously and deliberately ignorant of the scientific arguments that point out that it is physically impossible.
This never occurred to me, until now.
Pshaw. I mentioned that in another thread!The military does get training on certain chemicals (nerve/blood/blisting/choking agents, and relative persistence).
Parker's reply was that he didn't know how it could happen, but they've got to be spraying for SOME reason, so it must work... somehow.
Parker likes to hang out at the tautology club.
Didn't the feds admit to testing some kind of chemical spray over a town decades ago? I think it was in North Carolina in the 50s, but I'm far from certain on that.
IIRC, people got sick and a few may have died, and the feds had to admit to it and pay out some money. Good luck on google if you want to check.
Area of Vietnam: 128,527 sq mi
Area of Lower 48 states: roughly 2,000,000 sq mi
Your post mentions usage of almost 20,000,000 gallons of chemicals, used over a short period of a few years in Vietnam.
If you will note the picture in the OP this was done at low levels, as all chemical spaying must be done, by fleets of obvious purpose-built tankers, maintained and supplied by the entire logistics net of the US military.
To affect the US population with some super-secret chemical the US, even if one limited such spraying to metropolitan areas would require an effort at least an order of magnitude larger.
This would require an operation involving tens of thousands of people on a permanent basis.
People to build the tankers, or secretely modify existing airplanes to do something they weren't designed for, people to maintain these systems, people to manufacture/design whatever it is being "chemtrailed", people to move this chemical to where it is to be dispersed etc.
Any ONE of these people having an attack of conscience could easily reveal the whole conspiracy. The limited number of places that such tankers would be built also works against keeping this a secret.
Thank you for pointing out the scope and scale of the spraying operation in Vietnam. It gives us a good baseline for determining what would be required for this "chemtrail" theory (entire US for decades, and continuing today) to work, even if it wasn't physically impossible to spray chemicals at 30,000 feet in the manner proposed.
Only to you, Parker. Only to you.
For a fun excercise, let's see where Parker's logic can take us.
"The Us government has evil people in it, therefore they are quite possibly spraying us with "chemtrail" chemicals..See I have pictures of low level spraying of chemicals by the US government in other places. I even have pictures of what I think are the results of this spraying ."
The underlying logical form:
The US government has evil people in it, therefore they are possibly doing X . See I have pictures of the US government doing Y , which is kinda like X .
Let's subs ute something fun for X and Y.
The US government has evil people in it. therefore they are possibly training purple unicorns strapped with explosives to run up to terrorist hide-outs and detonate themselves. See I have pictures of dophins strapped with mines that were trained to swim up to ships and detonate. I even have pictures of explosions at terrorist hide-outs.
Do I understand that purple unicorns don't exist? No.
Do I have any testimony from someone involved in training the purple unicorns? No
Do I have any testimony from someone involved in secretly breeding existing horses into unicorns? No.
Do I have any testimony from someone involved in researching the unicorn physchology ? No
Do I have any idea how something like purple unicorns can be moved around with no one noticing? No. I have some third-hand data from someone who once took some soil samples in some random location though.
Do I have any testimony from anybody who has witnessed a purple unicorn in combat? No.
Do I have pictures of any purple unicorn remains? No, other than a spoof a skeptic did that got sucked up as gospel by fellow true-believers, of course.
What I do offer as proof is that explosions at terrorist camps don't look like explosions I saw as a kid, and pictures of explosions at terrorist camps.
I mean, how else do you explain how terrorist camps blow up? Sheesh. What is with you people who just don't believe your government is so evil that they train innocent unicorns to blow up terrorists? I mean these people are capable of anything.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 01-12-2011 at 11:25 AM.
Is there a search engine you'd recommend, or would one need to go to a library to find the information?
Obviously if its forming upper level cirrus clouds its not coming down right away.
Precipitation comes from low level clouds.
Last edited by Winehole23; 01-17-2011 at 06:28 PM.
DHS wanted to spray the Rio Grande river banks with Agent ing Orange on the riparian Carrizo cane, arondo donax, that illegals hide in.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 01-17-2011 at 07:53 PM.
I wonder what Parker thinks of this funny contrail?
![]()
Motive?
Obviously, US scientists have developed a jet that can rip holes through space/time, allowing them to effectively "warp".
Can I explain the physics? No.
Can I explain the coverup? No.
Can I still post this theory and call everyone who doesn't agree with me a mindless sheeple? yes!
I only watched about 40 minutes of the vid, but "geoengineering" is the whipping boy. In the context of this thread I suppose that could be strategic or remedial in aim, or both. Weather wars and cloud seeding, right?
I gather from the vid and friends who go in for this sort of thing that "geoengineering" or the like has been going on for some time by now, but really kicked into overdrive in the 1990's.
Just when air travel, deregulated and globalized, began to fill the skies in a noticeably fuller way. Coincidence?
Those nefarious government spooks timed it perfectly, wouldn't you say?
Don't mention weather wars, he might start harping on the old HAARP schtick.
(yeah, I went there)
Parker hasn't specifically opined on HAARP and its evil global control of the weather, but if he believes in chemtrails, then a belief in the evil HAARP conspiracy seems possible.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)