Spurs have absolutely no chance at winning the NBA le

[PBEEZY]

So if a bunch of random people vote they can't win it all, then that means they can't? ing stupid article.

NBA players were polled

[Nick Manning]

so John Amaechi was right.

what up homie, we jammin out lata today? bring your squire, i just learned smoke on the water

[Ocotillo]

And this proves?.............

Not sure it proves this but since players were the respondents to this survey, I would offer it means they underestimate the Spurs when they play them.

[ohmwrecker]

So, approximately 40 NBA players believe the Spurs can win the le?

[Blackjack]

So, approximately 40 NBA players believe the Spurs can win the le?

So long as 13 of which are Spurs, I'm good with that.

[MaNuMaNiAc]

This just goes to show people's stupidity is bulletproof

[PBEEZY]

So, approximately 40 NBA players believe the Spurs can win the le?

No only 157 players were polled, did anyone actually read the article Lol

[easy7]

...bring your squire...

Anything but the Fender Squire...

[ohmwrecker]

No only 157 players were polled, did anyone actually read the article Lol

Actually, . . . no. I didn't read it. I just did the quick maths.

[rmt]

Everybody lacks something this year.

For the first couple of months of the season - I was firmly just hoping for a fun year but didn't see the team as a legit contender unless they caught some huge breaks along the way.

Now, I tend to think "why not?" Every contender has flaws, none less so than the Spurs right now.

Would you please share what you think BOS lacks?

[Mel_13]

Spurs cant win it all with their style of play. Suns, Magic tried it and failed. The bad boy pistons were (imo) the only ones that were guard dominated offensively and won a few les. They however had tough big men and tough defense. Laimbeer, Rodman, Mahorn, Edwards and Salley. Besides Duncan and (Dice?) I really dont see anyone thats going to add to being a strong defensive team.

Its cool to run and gun, shoot 3's(Manu), break opposing players ankles (Tp), but that doesnt work in the conference finals and nba finals. Remember Kobe after shaq, before Gasol 05-07. Yeah he scored 40 and 50 and was basically unstoppable but he was first round fodder. You have to play D and have a low post presence (and use him). You see what happens when kobe takes 25 shots and Pau doesnt get touches.

Yet you want Bargnani..

[portnoy1]

[QUOTE=Mel_13;4892752]Yet you want Bargnani..[/QU leave it to mel13. Out of the many post, he just has to take a shot at my opinion. I want Bargs for his length an mobility. The 3pt shot is so Pop will play him over bonner. Lack of a jumpshot is one of the main reasons blair/splitter dont get alot of minutes an why bonner does. I feel that within the system bargs can be a solid mobile defender that has length.

[Mel_13]

leave it to mel13. Out of the many post, he just has to take a shot at my opinion.

That's how message boards work. You post comments, others comment on your opinions.

[dbreiden83080]

This season is starting to feel like 2003. If you did that poll then you would have got the same type of response. "Lakers will pull it together they are the champs" When Spurs played them in the playoffs nobody picked them to win in spite of the best record in the NBA. Anyone who is overlooking the Spurs with a record of 33-6 is just fooling themselves..

[portnoy1]

[QUOTE=Mel_13;4893754]

That's how message boards work. You post comments, others comment on your opinions.[/QU Glad to know i play a vital role in about 75% of your post. Btw, your boy parker was solid tonite imo.

[GrandeDavid]

Lakers are older than the Spurs. So stupid to still knock this team for age. Spurs will win #5 this season.

[DMC]

Sad thing is some of those players polled were Spurs...

[DeadlyDynasty]

Lakers are older than the Spurs. So stupid to still knock this team for age. Spurs will win #5 this season.

[portnoy1]

[QUOTE=gui ude27;4893930]Bonner and Bargnani on the same team...lol. Might as well go out and get Nash, Re and Kyle Korver to start along side them.[/QU if you get a bargnani, murphy or love in a trade you make sure bonner is included in the deal. Thats the reason you try to get guys like that in the first place, there multiple skills. Bargs is a 3pt shooter that can block shots an has solid lateral abilities on both ends. Murphy an love both shoot the 3 an rebound very well. The idea is that with any of them their would be no reason to keep a one trick pony an play him 25min a game next to tim. Forcing tim to guard every drive toward the basket or get every rebound.

[Mel_13]

Glad to know i play a vital role in about 75% of your post. Btw, your boy parker was solid tonite imo.

Delusional and obsessive. Btw-the quote isn't that complicated to use.

[Mel_13]

if you get a bargnani, murphy or love in a trade you make sure bonner is included in the deal. Thats the reason you try to get guys like that in the first place, there multiple skills. Bargs is a 3pt shooter that can block shots an has solid lateral abilities on both ends. Murphy an love both shoot the 3 an rebound very well. The idea is that with any of them their would be no reason to keep a one trick pony an play him 25min a game next to tim. Forcing tim to guard every drive toward the basket or get every rebound.

Except every trade that you propose to "exchange Bonner for Bargs" involves giving up a major piece on the team, usually Parker. Then you cry when anyone calls you on it.

[portnoy1]

[QUOTE=Mel_13;4894515]

Except every trade that you propose to "exchange Bonner for Bargs" involves giving up a major piece on the team, usually Parker. Then you cry when anyone calls you on it.[/QU fyi - im having problems with the quote cause i been using my phone. Trying to get used to it. An also i havent been negative regarding parker for awhile. You an brazil keep bringing up stuff regarding parker an me, which is weird cause i thought he played pretty good the last 2 games.

[SpursNextRomanEmpire]

thats good

[Mel_13]

An also i havent been negative regarding parker for awhile. You an brazil keep bringing up stuff regarding parker an me, which is weird cause i thought he played pretty good the last 2 games.

You brought up Parker's name in this thread, not me.

You just keep running from point I always make in your "let's get Bargs" posts: He's the face of their franchise on a 50M contract. Even if one assumes that the Spurs have interest, what would they have to give up to get Toronto to make a trade? You keep complaining that I comment on this long-running theme of yours, but you never answer the obvious question with any sort of realistic trade. You're perfectly free to propose that the Spurs trade for Bargs, but if you don't provide good reasons for both teams to make the trade you should expect others to comment on your proposal.

Still waiting.

[BlairForceDejuan]

lol too old as the rest of the league crumbles apart with injuries