oops wrong forum
could we finish #1 in offense and top 5 in defense??
![]()
triggas are swole now
Are you ing re ed? Miami is something like rank 2 in offense and rank 3 in defense. Already more impressive than the Spurs.
Crickets?![]()
it is a possibility![]()
Yep
What an ass...
A good chance. A very good chance.
Don't insult me comparing me to the likes of ing Louis.
35 posts in and you know who the louis is? troll out yourself much?
I'm not going to dignify some 12 year old toolbag with aLtErNaTiNg lEtTeRs for a screen name with a proper response. It's not 1999 anymore bud grow up.
O rly, mEsH sEt? Own yourself much?
well done
![]()
I thought Crickets would leave if the Spurs beat the T-Pups?
They are impressive, have a fine point differential, and especially they are impressive by starting to really win alot on the road, but stilll have beat very few strong teams and their SOS is below the Spurs: http://espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/powerrankings
The Spurs big three is also playing a lot less minutes and Hill was hurt and he is a damm good defender. The differences are not large 1-7 defensively and the Spurs could move up a few places while the Heat fall some and vice versa - it really does not matter as much as can the teams clamp down in the 4th and in the playoffs? At least the Spurs have shown the capacity do do that more lately this year, and the Heat seem to be doing it also in the games I have watched.
The Spurs (and to be fair the Heat as well) seem to be able to play at both a fast and slow pace.
I would not be at all surprised to see these two meet in the finals. The biggest question for both can they get through a few other tough teams in their respective conferences that may be bigger inside, although both the Spurs and Heat bring a lot to the table in star power with the Spurs core having all with multi championship level experience and a coach sagely monitoriing their minutes, while the Heat's core stars have youth (and get all the damm foul calls) going for them but will they be the ones to wear down without having the depth behind them; while the Spurs subs win games while the big three gets more rest?
Last edited by Rummpd; 01-12-2011 at 11:28 PM.
The all NBA gay team always takes a hands on ball approach.
![]()
We love our boys in silver and black.
![]()
What's that? I can't hear you over the Clipper fan celebration.
Defense is improving but wanna see it vs. very good teams
The Spurs are nothing but a gimmick until they beat a respectable basketball team in the playoffs. That hasn't happened since like 2005 as 2007 was gift wrapped by Stu Donaghy.
By what measure are you calling the Spurs the #1 offense and the #7 defense?
the lakers have that beat. Since they haven't beat a respectable team that was not seriously injured since '05
'04 is all they can hang their hat on, since the 04 spurs are the only respectable team they beat. but with a bull shot and help from the refs.
before that? the Kings? Not really, they had to use your pal Stu Donaghy and a collection of refs to beat them.
If you really think about it, the Lakers havent beat a respectable healthy team without cheating since the 80s. That's 20+ years.
Last edited by hater; 01-13-2011 at 11:17 AM.
Why yes. The Lakers won back to back les while dealing with serious injuries. Even coasted by the Spurs in 2008 despite missing two starters.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)