Reply With Quote
He's not tapping Eva on a reg basis
s with your head..
Yep, I cherry picked the first line of the first post in a thread that you started.
Says the guy with over 300 posts in the last week.
He's not tapping Eva on a reg basis
s with your head..
Yes, that's like me saying "'In the beginning..."' What's so great about that?" when referring to the entire Bible.
Cherry picked. Admit it. Move on. Had you simply posted my entire take, your response wouldn't make sense now would it? Hows that post count?
You obviously post to see yourself type. When you have something to say that makes sense and isn't cherry picked to try to get a fallacious point across, maybe I will offer you more than this.Says the guy with over 300 posts in the last week.
Again says the guy with over 300 posts in past week.
You posed a question in the thread le. You answered it in the first line. Later on you called someone a turd for finding fault with your position. You're clearly seeking attention, yet now you're crying when you get it.
I asked What's Up With Tony Parker?Again says the guy with over 300 posts in past week.
You posed a question in the thread le. You answered it in the first line. Later on you called someone a turd for finding fault with your position. You're clearly seeking attention, yet now you're crying when you get it.
I gave some possibilities. I didn't answer my own question. I then gave the reason for my question.
All you locked into was the opening line. Are you a news person because you seem to like taking bites and formulating a story.
Just face the truth, you grade posts. You have absolutely nothing to add, you just hold up score cards for posts.
Holy crap and I thought I overreacted....
You probably did if you think you did.
Btw, you have twice as many posts per day as I do. You are obviously seeking attention.
If you believe that, I'm done. At least you dropped the moronic post count smack.
But you didn't. How's that count now?
I do believe that. That's all you've shown me. Are you some great oracle of the game or just someone with an axe to grind?
Someone new starts posting and the whole bandwagon jumps on him like it's the hazing hour. That person rips most of you a new asshole and you all whine about how butt sore you are. Get over it.
My point in this thread is quite clear. If I have any axe to grind, it is with posters who can't make their case without calling other posters a turd or something similar.
Again, you've said absolutely nothing I didn't already know about you.
My point in this thread is quite clear. If I have any axe to grind, it is with posters who can't make their case without calling other posters a turd or something similar.
Score recorded, it will be averaged with the rest of the turds' scores. Move on. You were done responding, right?
You must be the loneliest person here.
Do you even understand what your saying? Or do you just have your keyboard set on babble?
His Assist average is going back up... hes doing fine! We are still winning arnt we?
You have to read the entire thread... context.
It's "you're", btw. (speaking of babble)
Cool, so there are no repairable issues on the Spurs team. There are no reasons for talk about issues, since the Spurs are winning.
Notice the times on those posts, or do I need to draw that out for you with fat crayons?
Also, two different threads.
You're not the sharpest tool in the box I see.
wasn't Tony sick or something?
He went into a slump. But no biggie IMO.
He still is assassin when needed.
Thats funny, When Tony distributes and becomes a facilitator people complain. I love it; his shot may not be falling right now, but he just makes sure to keep the ball moving and not try to force too much. Its the exact same thing Manu would do, and we would praise him for it.
You say that now, because the Spurs are winning against soft teams. When they face a challenge and Tony isn't up to snuff, then there will be threads about where comments like yours are scarce.
Tony didn't suddenly become John Stockton or Rajon Rondo. He's a probing PG who looks to score first. If that were to suddenly change, we might as well use Chris Quinn, since he can pass the ball as well as Parker.
Tp has never been a great passer. Thats never what I meant. But we have so much scoring power thats its not nessecary for him to try and score 25 every might. His shot is not going down, so he can make sure that other guys get more opportunities and shots.
To illustrate: do you think the spurs would have won by 15pts or at all against the lakers if 1) kobe took 17 shots instead of 27 and 2) pau and bynum got those 10 attempts in the post?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions