Reply With Quote
Mic e Malkin? LMAO
But seriously, thanks for not posting her disgusting mutilated looking face.
In fact, selective blood libel.
And selective support of thought police.
lol
Mic e Malkin? LMAO
But seriously, thanks for not posting her disgusting mutilated looking face.
You start with the result and work backwards. Notorious crimes like mass killings are a popular platform for the ticking time bomb hypothesis. You point to the terrible result and say s/he was a ticking time bomb. Imagination and passion do the rest.
It's time to round up all community college dropouts who post on the internets. They represent a clear and present danger to the homeland.
The Repugs/conservatives/NRA are fully to blame for the loose/non-existent/unenforced gun control regulations. Families run more background checks on nannies than gun dealer ran on the AZ shooter.
AZ got the ignominy it deserves for its non-stop, "full-bore" hate/racist/violent political talk and its insanely loose guns "laws".
America's and the world's financial disaster, the Banksters' Great Depression, is fully blamed on on conservative/VWRC deregulation of the financial sector.
townhall.com?
WOW!!!
How very Westboro of you.
Particularly since it appears the violence bore no relationship to any right-wing rhetoric.
In fact, it's being reported now that Loughner would become visibly angry at the sight of President Bush. Not exactly a response incited by Tea Party or right wing rhetoric.
yoni clinging to hearsay lol
The left-wing media and Obama acolytes spent a week clinging to absolutely nothing but their hatred of Sarah Palin and the Tea Party.
so, they're no different from you.
thanks for admitting that.
by the way.......a guy went on a killing spree at a democratic rally.
Sure we're different.
They spent a week spreading a libel. I've spent that time pointing out that's what it was. In the end, who was right?
You're an idiot.
well obama and the majority of democrats didn't blame the right so the article started off s being unfactual...
you're a dishonest person
a blood libel
pimping your epic failI've spent that time pointing out that's what it was.
me. a guy went on a killing spree at a democratic rally.In the end, who was right?
you're a suckerYou're an idiot.
Nor did they stand up -- from the very beginning -- and call for restraint and patience (as in the Fort Hood Massacre). Those that didn't blame the right were perfectly willing to stand by while their minions in the media did it for them.
Not dishonest at all.
It's only when it became apparent most Americans weren't buying the narrative that Obama attempted to call off the dogs. Unfortunately, many were so invested in the meme they just can't control themselves.
so it wasn' true that neither obama or his supporters blamed the right..thanks for enforcing that malkin was lying
how do you know what people are thinking?
They're called Asians asshole. Bigots...Mic e Malkin? LMAO
But seriously, thanks for not posting her disgusting mutilated looking face.
No, you're making no sense.
apparently your going to play stupid.. obama didn't blame the right... then premise of malkin's essay...
I haven't read Malkin's essay and I've never said Obama blamed the right. Only that he was slow to admonish his followers on blaming the right.
so you read the article in the previous thread...but not this one...ok
More than likely, I've been responding to what has been posted not what Malkin said.
But, if it'll make you feel better, I'll go read the essay. Is it in the OP of this thread?
You're right. I read the essay and Malkin unfairly conflated two separate issues to infer Obama was blaming the right for violence. I think she combined the two ideas that 1) the left is prone to blame violence on the right and 2) Obama and his followers blame everything that ails the world (or something to that effect) on people with whom they disagree.
I will say, I've never heard Obama blame the right for the Tucson massacre. However, he has spent pretty much the past two years blaming Bush for all his problems.
Also, the specific incidents she cites, later in the essay, can be found elsewhere and, I think, are dead on about how much of the left reacts to violence.
Their first reaction is to try and pin it on right-wing ideology or rhetoric. The Times Square bomber being a good example. Also, I don't recall Obama ever standing up and counseling restraint unless it was believed the violence was the result of left-wing or Islamic ideology.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
