sure he's a young trade asset, but thats not all youve been saying...youre making homerish claims about him having wayyyy more trade value than george hill. you do know that george hill, even before last season's strong 2nd half and playoffs, was a key piece in a package to get VC from the Nets? that when the spurs ask about any established player hill is always the young key player teams want in return?
hill > roddy right now...both as a player and as a trade asset.
i wont dispute that, im simply saying roddy's potential alone couldnt grab sjax or gwall...wallace isnt even that old btw. pretty sure he's still in his late 20s, he came into the league from hs if im not mistaken. and tbh dallas' window is closing just as fast as the spurs' window is, not sure they can afford to wait
for roddy develope (if he even developes) since dirk isnt getting any younger.