Reply With Quote
wasn't Glenn Big Dog Robinson a 10 day in 2005?
I remember him having a big game in that years playoffs. not sure tho
Has anyone picked up a 10 day street guy mid season and have him eventually make any kind of significant contribution to a playoff run?
wasn't Glenn Big Dog Robinson a 10 day in 2005?
I remember him having a big game in that years playoffs. not sure tho
Splitter probably does, but because Pop doesn't give him consistent minutes or call plays to give him consistent looks, he hasn't been able to develop it.
Splitter's good game against Sacramento really got you butthurt, huh?
I doubt he gets much time when Bonner gets back so i don't know why you're getting your panties in a bunch over it.
Not at all, I would like nothing more to see him be a dominant force for the Spurs. I'm a Spurs fan, whatever is best for the team is what I want to see happen. This is directed at all the morans on this board that turn every single thread into 2nd guessing Pop's coaching when we're farking 42-8.
moops
Isn't this the dude from Blue Chips?
Could be. I thought it was Kenny Powers after he got cut from spring training.
Is that what teabaggers look like when they're young?
I don't know her politics. Only her name.
steve novak
chachi with the goods.
Yeah, back to the topic -- he's not very good. I just don't see that he has enough going for him to stay on the floor.
. Stupid signing. Pointless.
I don't want to get into another Tiago debate, but the Kings game should not be used as an indicator of his progress. There was almost zero defense from the Kings in that game. Tony and Tim were running layup drills.
The Kings game is an indicator that he's a legitimate player in the NBA. Progress comes from actually getting consistent playing time. Besides, the defense to be focusing on comes from Splitter, not from the opponent.
Yeah, he shouldn't be backing up Blair, who excels at that very thing.
Tiago should be in the all star game I guess huh?.....
Last edited by G-Dawgg; 02-07-2011 at 06:55 PM.
Temple was significant against the mavs last year, not huge but significant.
Honestly unsure of why he's not around in place of Quinn other than Pop realizing he's just injury insurance here and will not get a roll in the next 3 years behind Manu, Hill, Parker, and Neal where as he can probably be a rotation player somewhere else but nothing super.
Anyone else notice that the spurs really do seem to make an effort to give players that would be non essential to team success the chance to find opportunities else where if they make a request?
I would've rather kept Owens tbh.
10 day v. rest of season commitment. Once we get past the veteran buyouts at the end of the month, they can always go back and sign Owens if they want to ensure he's on the SL team and in training camp.
pop finding every excuse to not play splitter.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
