lol at the resemblance
You mean buthrut?
Celtics just lost to the Bobcats. 1 more game in the loss column helps.
Thanks Charlotte!
crofl at the amounts of asshurt in this threadat Phillip, who's just jealous that our 6'10" white boy shoots AND plays better defense this year than their turtle-man.
How much does it suck that a guy you're paying $11,400,000 next year is worse in every aspect of the game than Matt Bonner?
tl:dr for this entire thread:
BONNER >>>>>>>> TERRY
all this talk about splitter and pop will not play him for a game
just like he did with neal
Not yet. Keep trying though! You gotta bait 'em all to be the troll-kemon master someday.lmao asshurt lol asshurt lol lol asshurt asshurt asshurt
Now that they're talking about Splitter, expect Pop to sit him for the next 10 games.
Phil is a smart mav fan but he's out on a limb by suggesting that the Spurs haven't been hit with the injury bug they're "supposed" to be hit with. "Major" injuries to stars are the exception, not the norm.
And jetersmash is one of the better analytical posters on ST.
Getting on and then answering with 'lol gnsf' doesn't exactly clean you up.
Last edited by jag; 02-08-2011 at 12:01 AM.
Yeah that 42-8 record really has got us asshurt! Obvious troll fail is obvious...crofl at the amounts of asshurt in this thread
1st round failure got
HCA is somehow overrated once you are playing a plyoff series. You only have to lose 1 game to hand it over to the 8th seed....
lol caring about spelling on the internet
lol you mad?
IIRC a number of times, i said that my point was that the spurs have not faced any major adversity yet. usually they come in the form of an injury to a major player, or the team gets off sync and goes through a slump. all teams have one or the other, its incredibly rare that a team gets through a season without both.
fpoonsie seemed to have no issue with understanding my point, something jetersmash aka mr analytical was unable to do, then you have dumbasses like CH waltzing in saying "Bonner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TERRY, stupid ing turtlehead!!!!!!! LOLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!" when terry was never even remotely a part of this discussion.
perhaps i didnt clarify my comments very well in the initial post that i put up, but i certainly clarified them when replying to fpoonsie, and suddenly jetersmash had no retort other than to bleed out his ass because he thought i was making an attempt to troll, when i wasnt.
Why does terry look like a rat?
Wrong.
You made an assertion that was false. You claimed that the Spurs were somehow shooting excessively well from the field and that there was some inevitable jump shooting slump that hadn't come yet.
Go back and read the exchange.
I explicitly granted your point about spurs not enduring major injuries. I mentioned it briefly in my response, but that wasn't the emphasis of my post.
I mentioned Ginobili, Parker, Hill, and Neal as having gone through shooting slumps, and your response was "lmao thinking jefferson shooting 40% from 3/Bonner shooting 50% from 3 = normal." I didn't mention Bonner or R.J. in my initial response. You made a claim that our jumpshooting has somehow been so consistent from the field and it was destined to drop markedly. I gave you names of players who have already been through slumps - often during different times of the season (Parker has played well while Ginobili has been in a slump, and vice versa, for example).
Where's your concern with Boston? They lead the entire league in field goal percentage, and they take their fair share of jump shots.
You made a poor argument and you don't seem to be well informed about how the spurs are playing at all, and in your defense, I wouldn't expect you to be well-informed as a non-spurs fans.
Provide evidence to back up your claim, and be careful and explicit with your definitions. Do all rotation players need to be in a slump to meet your definition? How many games does a "stretch" encompass?as regards to my slump comments earlier that apparently gnsf is too stupid to comprehend, what im saying is that most teams at least once a year will have a strech where the team as a whole seems to get off beat, adversity strikes, and the teams ends up slumping as a whole.
Frankly, I think you're talking out of your ass here, but I'm completely willing to admit I'm wrong if you can bring any semblance of substance and objectivity to your claim.
I don't believe most teams go through some sort of inevitable stretch where the entire team goes through a jump shooting slump. Mind you, I'm not asserting the negative here. I'm merely rejecting your premise due to insufficient (utterly lacking, actually) evidence.
Your argument and subsequent "lmao" responses were just so mind-numbingly idiotic, I couldn't help but think that you were trolling! You didn't clarify a thing by responding to Fpoonsie. You agreed with him, and then gave your 67 win Mavericks as a sole example of what you deem to be the "norm" for "most teams."
lets take the last three championship runs of the spurs for example
in 06-07, there were two separate stretches of 5 losses in 8 games, and during those stretches, the team was quite inconsistent on offense, shooting extremely poorly as a whole for the most part, and the defense was clearly out of sync, allowing over 50% shooting several times. and there were no injuries to the major rotation players like Manu, Tim, Tony, Finley, Oberto, etc...
in 04-05, they hit similar rough patches in february and march. some of it was due to missing timmy, some of it was simply inconsistent play by the spurs.
02-03 saw some pretty rough patches in november and december.
generally, all teams go through rough patches of inconsistency and lack of chemistry for a short while, whether its due to injury, poor shooting, or just unknown reasons, it happens. i never said it is a 100% chance that it will happen, just that generally, if you go through most every championship team, they had a rough patch or two. all ive said is that this years spurs team has not hit that rough patch, and perhaps they never will, who knows? but going by history, most teams do. maybe you should do your own research on your own ing team before acting like the ignorant bag you are.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
