Reply With Quote
i thought this was a buffalo wing thread and got real excited for a second.
Remember all the talk about the lack of a wing stopper in the off season? So much for that. Now, it is only two thirds of the way through the regular season, so there's plenty of time for this supposed vulnerability to emerge. But consider this: How many times this season have you thought to yourself after a game that the reason the Spurs struggled or lost because they didn't have anyone capable of playing acceptable defense on the wings?
This team is 7th in defensive efficiency at 100.4, a mere .3 away from 5th. They're better than they've been defensively in three years and this is with Duncan playing 28.7 mpg, Splitter not being a rotation player and Anderson having barely played at all. That's not to say their ranking is largely predicated on stellar defense on the wings. But if it were such an issue, even with an elite defensive anchor (which Duncan still is), they wouldn't be one of the best defensive teams in the league. Granted, they haven't played the Heat yet and did miss Anthony and Gay, among others, once.
What do you think, was the so-called issue overblown? Will it become an issue at some point? And, if you do think it will become an issue at some point, do you think they're strong enough in enough areas to overcome it?
i thought this was a buffalo wing thread and got real excited for a second.
Not having Finlet at the starting SF position has made all the difference.
DeJuan Blair looks like he could stop his fair share of buffalo wings....
Mmm...garlic wings with blue cheese...
But in all fairness, George Hill has been a pretty serious perimeter defender for us. He's definately not Bruce Bowen, but then again then aren't really many players in that class defensively anymore...
I said for a long time that the only way to replace Bowen is by committee. I'd submit that getting rid of guys like Barry, Finley, Mason and Bonner (in a starting role) and replacing them with Anderson, Neal, Hill, Blair and Dice is exactly why the Spurs have been able to succeed. For the first time in several years, the Spurs don't have one or two guys on the floor at any given time who are easily exploited by the other team (or just flat don't give a about defense).
In addition, you really can't overstate how much better Richard Jefferson has been on both ends of the floor this year.
Where do you get those??????????????
I don't think it was overblown in the sense that a lot of people (me included) didn't think RJ had it on him anymore. But props to him for really working hard and sticking to putting the effort out there night in and out. Some credit also has to go to Dice, who has also improved on defensive rotations and understanding his defensive role much better, be it playing next to Duncan or not.
The other caveat is that nobody really knew the offense would turn into this meat grinder back then. I mean, it's rare if we don't shoot over 60% on at least a quarter in a game, and that was a rarity in season's past. Obviously, that puts less pressure on defense, and so giving up a few baskets is not a game changing proposition anymore.
All that said, I think we'll still have trouble with certain matchups, namely guys like Dirk, and potentially guys like Odom. But they're good players. As long as we can make up the difference on the other end (and this season looks like we can), then it's much less of a concern obviously.
I think it would still be nice to have but we dont need it! It has felt like a NEED in the past because of what we lacked in other areas of our team.. We have NEVER had shooting like this!
not more than 9 times.
i was thinking more along the lines of this.
i was thinking more along the lines of this.
I love there fries!
Hill has done a good job when healthy defending some of the tougher matchups. Also Jefferson has been better, and it has been addition by subtraction because the Spurs don't have Finley or Mason anymore.
I still am not sure if the Spurs will be able to get enough stops when it really matters in the playoffs. They miss Bowen's ability to play physical defense without getting a lot of fouls called on him. George Hill trying to cover someone like Wade is not going to get a lot of calls his way, because he doesn't have the rep like Bowen had.
Still, the Spurs have had some good defensive moments this year holding teams to 13-15 points per quarter fairly often. Every team wishes they had some freaky 6' 10" athletic big who could cover the Dirk, Lebron, West, Aldridge and Odom type player. But there aren't that many guys like that out there.
I think this is an interesting thread. But my opinion is that wing stop is good but buffalo wild wings is better because of the environment and the bar environment.
this is how i see it
it use to be us adjusting our lineup to match the other team which = fail
now they are force to match up against our lineup and style of play, which is a win for us
remember since our last championship and small ball, pop went away from playin big frontline which costs us champions and losing to teams we have no business losing to.
Good points...
I also would add that the league is changing to allow OFFENSE to get away with more...and kind of handcuffing DEFENSES...
I don't know if Bowen was the last of his type-but the rule changes have made it much more important to be great at offense and just good at defense...
I think Pop saw this and made the changes to give the Spurs a chance to compete again.
Because the NBA's better athletes can be found at the SG/SF position, I think about it everytime one of those players goes "iso" on the Spurs. Even your run-of-the-mill SG/SFs have individual field days on this team. DeMar DeRozan comes to mind, as of late. Caron Butler scorched the Spurs for 30 pts in an earlier game this season.
There's no question, as a team, the Spurs are playing better overall team defense. However, when they need to prevent opposing perimeter players from getting into the paint, denying face-up jumpers or keeping them getting to the offensive glass, this team STILL lacks a suitable defensive wing player that can cause problems for guys when they're "on a roll" and abusing the Spurs.
RJ and Neal are unable to defend at that type of level and it's unfair to expect Manu to do it, with his overall offensive responsibilities.
Furthermore, the lack of another big body, to help Tim protect the rim, really emphasizes the need for better perimeter defense.
True and true.
Dice often does a great job on Dirk and West, although Lamar hacked him up (too quick) and LaMarcus stomped everyone who tried. We do lack that long, quick, defensive-minded 3/4/5, but as you say they are hard to come by, and the team D (and supercharged offense) is mostly making up for it.
This thread is a testament to how massively underrated Bruce Bowen always has been by all except hardcore Spurs fans. Here's to you, Bruce.
The "iso" guy who I used to worry about was Kobe, because he singlehandedly beat us more than once. However, he can't do it consistently any more, and I don't think he's capable of winning 4 out of 7 on his own.
I'll trust in the team D, the chemistry, and the high-octane O, and ride it as far as it goes.
What I think has helped overcome the issue somewhat is the fact that we seem to be playing a bit 'faster' on the defensive end as well; our players like RJ/Hill/Neal seem to be making a concerted effort to rotate quickly and stay with their man. I'm not sure if it's just the games I've been able to catch, but I've seen less funneling as well. At times though, it's been exposed when they get out of position or the ball is reversed; why some teams have been able to exploit us on the perimeter for open shots.
If our guys continue to be scrappy on the perimeter, tighten up rotations and play smart team defense we can mitigate the loss of a lockdown guy.
ElNono, guys like Nowitzki and Odom have nothing to do with the wing defenders. They're power forwards.
honestfool84, the point was, even in games where the Spurs won, how many times have you felt the lack of a so-called wing stopper was noticeable or they had to overcome it?
SenorSpur, DeRozan isn't quite run of the mill, but even if you still consider him that, every team is going to have random players go off on them throughout the course of an 82 game season.
You're right, though. They're not good defensively in isolations on the perimeter and they really only have one shot blocker and have one player in their rotation above 6-9, yet despite that they're 7th in defensive efficiency and perilously close to 5th.
It's probably an issue that will become more pronounced eventually, but is it enough to be the Spurs undoing? My sense is, only the Heat could cause the Spurs enough of a problem in this area for that to be the case.
The reality is, the term "stopper" is becoming almost like the term "true center". There just aren't many around anymore and a lot of that has to do with the rules. Team defense and rim protection are more important than ever. This team is strong enough in enough areas that I'm confident they can overcome the lack of a go-to wing defender.
i was thinking more along the lines of this.
The Spurs could still use another good perimeter defender but the Spurs have done okay this year because:
1. RJ is playing very solid positional defense. Better than in the past.
2. Manu is playing very solid positional defense. Better than in the past.
3. Hill has been off and on playing solid positional defense.
4. The Spurs are trapping the ball on dangerous players (examples Melo, Kobe, Rose).
Note: This trapping may lose effectiveness in a 7 game series.
Funnelling only works when you have two shot-blockers in the paint, which the Spurs don't have. It also served to really wear down Tim Duncan, as the only shot-blocker. The Spurs now have five guys who have quick enough feet to stay in front of their guy most of the time and quick enough hands to get into passing lanes to set up the running game. Also, unlike the last few years, they're running.
The biggest problem they've had defensively is when they switch on the pick and roll. The Knicks game comes to mind. Other than that they've been in just about every game, or they just lost because they couldn't hit a shot. For the relative effort level, they're playing far better defense than they have in a long time, which just means they're fresh for a playoff run.
+1 on BWW
Their new Thai Curry wings are off the chain!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
