Great post.
You CANNOT blame the Lakers for paying Bynum what they did. You don't take a gamble on a potential A-list center in this day and age, because they've become fairly rare. Had the Spurs taken a shot at Bynum, I would have loved the idea. Mobile 7'2" guys that can score... they just don't come along every draft.
Bynum's contract isn't HORRIFIC, it's just bad.
Now Walton, Artest, and Blake -- THOSE are awful, awful contracts with really no potential rationale, except perhaps Artest. But even with him, they knew it was a huge gamble and they signed him anyway. We've seen teams sign players like this in the past thinking they could change the player. It just doesn't happen 9 times out of 10. If they're willing to pay him that to get a single ring, more power to them. The Lakers might have mortgaged their next 4 years to do it though, because that's a massive contract and it's only going to get worse every game that Artest releases a mixtape after.

Reply With Quote
