btw scro, which mavfan am I?
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...1&postcount=23
I can probably find more examples of her questioning spurfans about this...
ElNono you are the most transparent poster when it comes to your intentions. You waddled into the forum last night, bleeding profusely from the asshole, and crying about Knicks coverage and how it's impeding on the Spurs (and Mavs games). You've done nothing in this thread but about the knicks, Melo and Amare. If those two are such stat s, then why would they not stay with their respective teams where they are the unquestioned first option, so they could rack up all the #'s they want, with impunity? They joined up to collect W's, not stats...same reason the C's, Lakers, and Heat made superteams. The Knicks game (and subsequent Sunday Convo) are of greater media interest than some chicken monotonous spurs game, capiche?
I suggest packing your asshole with gauze, but if that doesn't stop the bleeding you should probably hit up the ER for some anal sutures.
The Knicks are good again and they're here to stay. Living in New York, you're only going to get more and more coverage about them.
Neal with it.
Or you could just go to NBA.com if you want to see highlights.
"I didn't ask nor need for validation to the Spurs or Dallas. I think their record speaks for themselves. I do think the Knicks coverage is way overblown."
"The only notables in week 1 of Melo being there is losing to the Cavs at home and beating the Heat on the road. I understand the lovefest with the Lakers, Boston and up to an extent, Miami... they're freakishly good teams and their play reflect that"
"This Knicks team is nowhere near there, and IMO, they don't deserve the mega coverage they're getting. It's an opinion. I'm not losing sleep over it nor you need to agree with it".
I ended up catching some better highlights on NBA TV, actually. Hate to say this, but roddy is looking good.
tbh, does it matter? skank, dirk4mvp, M<S... they're all the same.
The Knicks just teamed together 2 top-10 players, and they've been together only 1 week and were facing their first marquee game (which more than lived up to the hype). That doesn't warrant "mega coverage?"
Even if you're trying to sell the angle that you were only hot and bothered about the Sunday Convo, it doesn't look good since just about every question they asked Melo and Amare was about the Heat
The Knicks have two top-6 scorers (newly teamed together) and you think ESPN should back-page them?
The Knicks (and their army of media coverage) are here to stay. Accept it.
It does matter.
tbh I'm Jacob1983
Because everyone outside of Homertalk.com knows you are 2nd round playoff fodder that won't even come close to sniffing athis season.
Why the would anyone hype up an irrelevant team?![]()
Last edited by Kobe_5_Duncan_4; 02-28-2011 at 01:31 PM.
"Actually, I know for a fact you're not Jacob1983 because I'm Jacob1983"
Who's fault is it that you know this yet you still expect it to change?
I don't ING know! GodDAMMIT!
![]()
Truth.
btw Arlington is a yuppie cesspool, used to hate it there
Not a mavs fan, tbh
When I don't know about a troll I assume he is bump, it is working pretty well tbh fwiw
God, I hate you guys so much.
The Spurs and Mavs highlights were after the Minnesota/Golden State highlights.
You were saying?
The exact point of this thread. You've finally circled your way to it. Welcome aboard.
Who on the Mavs or Spurs put up 37/23?
Why should games where really good teams beat up average or bad teams be near the top of the hour when a player in the league is doing something that hasn't been done in like 25 years?
K-Love is doing something pretty spectacular and pretty unprecedented this season. Are you not aware of this?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)