Reply With Quote
He didn't even had to run anything, just wind the clock down...
At this point I would rather have Sequ running the point. Quinn is a disaster. Get us Temple, Arroyo, literally anybody, I don't care. This guy cannot run a team at all. He's basically an undersized two, and can just stand in the corners and shoot wide open jumpers if Manu is creating, but that's about it. He can't run any sets, he can't run a Pick-and-roll, he can't do anything. If he's the point guard the team literally never, ever gets anything resembling a quality shot.
Also, he SUCKS on defense.
That is all.
He didn't even had to run anything, just wind the clock down...
Yeah all stars at every position!
Who gives a if he can run the offense
Carlos Arroyo's best days left him in freaking Utah. Garrett Temple had his chance and failed early in the season to be the third point.
You won't find a better player than him in the D League and Quinn has been with the team all year, he has a WAY bigger grip of the offense than anyone else you will find.
Hes a THIRD STRING PG for chrissakes...
Ya, we may have seen the last of Quinn tonight...That was pretty damn bad I thought
I am new to SpursTalk, but have already noticed all the Sequ comments. What gives?
Exaggerate much?
Quinn has been here all year and he had to sit down to close the game because he couldn't even wind the clock down against the bench of the worst team in the league.
This kid just can't get minutes for the next two weeks on a consistent basis.
If the FO doesn't want to bring anybody, that's fine. But if Hill can play "60 minutes", then he should.
tru dat.
It's probably just a factor of never playing anything but garbage time. How the is he supposed to improve? I mean he is an average player but he'd play better if he got subbed in more often.
Don't worried. Quinn won't get much miniutes as long as Parker stays healthy.
If it wasn't for Quinn that 25pt lead would have been 35 points!
Who though? Brewer would not have helped the PG problem and all the available PGs are worse than Quinn.
The only one who's debatably worse is Temple.
Arroyo is worse.
It's debatable. I personally think that for the vet min (200k, IIRC) you can try renting Arroyo or bring in Temple and see what happens. We have the roster spot and it's chump change in the big scheme of things.
Like I said, if you want to convince me none of those options are better than Quinn, no problem. Just play Hill instead.
Arroyo is pretty bad, but he started 42 games for one of the top teams in the league this season, and played a moderate 20mpg. If anything, he has been playing.
Opinion stated as fact carries no weight, no matter how many times you repeat it. In addition, you don't have to get rid of one to acquire the other, so the Spurs can find out. I cannot for the life of me figure out why you would be opposed to it.
Because its a third string PG position, and in all reality Arroyo isn't gonna be that big a deal.
Not right now it isn't.
Saying that all available PGs are better than Quinn and Temple is a fact?
I'm not opposed to it if Arroyo would be willing to "try out" on a 10 day or something. I just don't see it happening. I assume the PG position is probably the most difficult to learn on the fly in the Spurs' system. By the time Arroyo "gets it" enough make a difference Parker will be back. In the meantime, you have two 3rd string PGs who can't execute the offense or defend their position.
I think the solution is to split PG minutes between Manu, Hill and Neal and give Anderson more minutes at SG/SF. , give Jeffers a few minutes, too.
Spurs haven't had a decent back up since Speedy Claxton, unless I'm forgetting someone.
That would work...
Who said that? I said the only available PG that's debatably worse than Quinn is Temple. If you'd like to pull up stats to compare Quinn and Arroyo to see who's a better bet for a backup then be my guest.
That's what I've been trying to say ever since Tony went down.
Good to know there's other people that get it.
What's the difference? That still sounds like everyone else is better than Quinn and Temple.
I just did (for s and giggles) and it's not that conclusive. Whatever slight advantage Arroyo may have over Quinn is negated by the fact that Quinn has been here for most of the season and knows the system, regardless of his inability to run it effectively.
I don't really have a lot of interest in debating the issue though. It seems kind of pointless.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
