Reply With Quote
saw this today. Not much different than all the other 9/11 first hand account vids I seen before.
Good stuff though.
Saw some article on yahoo so I'm just gonna post the vid...
Uploaded today:
I haven't watched it all because the is 17 mins and taking forever to load.
saw this today. Not much different than all the other 9/11 first hand account vids I seen before.
Good stuff though.
I don't need any videos to know what took place on 9/11 everything was clearly explained to me with this.....
What a ty video to waste our time with.
Mouse... You're an idiot!
Yeah this vid wasn't really anything to wait almost 10 years for. Just a different angle. Lotsssssss of edits though. Does that mean anything? Who knows.
I have found name calling is good way to judge someone's character or lack of. You must feel so proud and intelligent when you hit the submit reply icon.
on a side note: that video has been around the torrent sites for awhile. It was not new footage. Anyone here who has BTjunkie 911 and 9/11 has over 30 GBs of footage and photos, many videos are not in English. I thought this was going to be some sort of never seen before footage but i guess as far as the public is concerned it must be.
Is the video in the torrent edited?
Not sure I have 3 different versions of a chopper flying directly over the towers and i remember two were in a different language one was in English. The film was bundled with other rare WTC footage taken by people who didn't have to comply with American laws.
They have films of bodies bouncing off the pavement and you can see close ups of people begging to be rescued off the damaged floors. Unlike the videos we see on the History channel or Fox news.
Anyone who is a major torrent freak and loves rare footage probably has the same videos. I never thought it was so special until now.
here is a non working torrent that must have been puled from the site.
http://btjunkie.org/torrent/wtc-foot...df267fdf222d3d
Strange. I've never questioned that official 9/11 story, and I was very shocked anyone would accuse the government of being complicit with the actions of Islamofacists when I read a french magazine less than a week after the attack (really disgusting accusations), but something just doesn't seem right about that footage. The towers just look too tall and sturdy to have come down from those fires. I can understand them toppling over to the sides because of the impact, but they came down like perfect flapjacks. That's some kind of miracle! (except people died, so its a bad miracle).
Never forget, they want to kill us and take our jobs!
Edit: That last comment was directed toward the threat of terrorists, not the government.
In order to go back 4 years I would have to retrieve a HD from storage and then pay my photobucket account to host the footage, but if you go to the 0:53 mark on this video you can see one of the choppers where I received some of my footage.
Every time I see those videos, my blood boils.
I was in the military at the time. The speed at which the military can mobilize is incredible. When the first plane hit, we all couldn't believe it. Second one hit and we immediately started reconfiguring the aircraft fleet while some went to get our mobility bags. Were set to ship out within at least 20 minutes. Unfortunately we had to wait quite some time before we figured out where we were going.
There once was a time (2004) where your post would have been called Anti American.
I never was paying much attention what happened 9/11 as far as who did it and why?
But lately I've seen one 'do entary' movie /video/ and some footage and it got my interest to the point that I know it was no frickin terrorist attack.
So many unanswered questions taht simply could be answered. Or Bush saying that he saw first plane hit the tower on tv at the time. [like any tv had set their cameras on WTC all the time/
Or how come this towers went down. It was close to impossible. And melted steal after those towers went down. Melted from just a jet fuel? come on.
Also on the news like 20 minutes after the plane hit the tower there were already specialist who claimed that it was terrorist attack and that Bin Laden trained blah blah blah
All in all it took me about 2 days with all that, not intense to know the .
Are people capable of conveying a complete, coherent thought in Poland?
BUt maybe you've got more info on the matter.
I do not know
This is me throwing just random thoughts.
I do not care about long posts.
Thanks for interest.
What's for dinner?
I need to drink water.
GTFO
This has been discussed ad nauseam in basically every major forum on the internet who pays attention to such things. Every conspiracy theory about how the towers fell, why they fell, and if they should have fallen has been completely debunked.
It wasn't just the jet fuel. Do you realize how much force is behind 60+ TONS of metal and steel (63,000 kilos) moving at 300+ mph? It's not like they took jet fuel, sprayed it around inside with a hose and then lit it on fire. They flew a massive plane into the building. It wasn't just a fire. It was a huge collision, huge explosion, and then the subsequent fires of 1000 degrees+ that brought the buildings down.
So the fire made the towers go down like that?
what about this third building?
Yes. The collision combined with the explosion and the subsequent fires weakened the internal support structure of the building. The central supports failed, and the building fell in on itself.
what about this third building?
That's WTC 7 after the two towers fell nearby. That damage combined with the fires inside weakened the support structure enough to bring it down.
It was headquarters for some government agency, maybe disaster response? I forget, but the really, really hot embers landed on the building and caused it to get really, really hot itself, then it came down like a pancake, just like the other two buildings. The local officials deemed it to damaged to be used anymore so they "pulled" everyone from the building to limit further casualties.
Also add to the mix that a BBC reporter was already talking about a collapsed building that had yet to collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/results?hl=en...-8&sa=N&tab=w1
All these discovery channel responses is proof many people today still don't have a free will to think on their own.
What many of these talking heads don't mention is that the buildings in NY were "steel framed" buildings that have (never) collapse due to heat. And even if that day was the magical day that Newtons laws of physics was to be re-written a "collapsed" building does not turn into dust and leave traces of explosive materials.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
