Reply With Quote
Exactly
(who is having the hearing can make a big, big difference wholly apart from political affiliation)
Exactly
So you know -all too but thought it well to twit the rest of us for our ignorance.
Classic.
Did any of them claim that 85% of mosques were breeding grounds?
I am not sure if you stupid or just playing stupid but it's obvious to most rational people that King is the last person who should be holding these meetings. He is already on record as to how he feels bout muslim organizations..
so which is it darrins?
You proved exactly what a moderate Nazi is by not denouncing them and refusing to them in to the authorities.
King is providing an excellent example of how the GOP manages to start with an advantage of the natural conservatism of Americans and make itself unattractive.
I love how a libnut from A-Mess-NBC starts off an interview...
"You and I are both white...", WTF?
He has a great response to her question that leaves her dumbfounded.
Whatever, Nazi traitor.
The GOP goes from Mr. Republican, Robert Taft, opposing the internment of citizens of Japanese descent during wartime to Mr. King.
Yet this is still not refuting Nazis or Neo-Nazis.
Are you or are you not a member of the neo-nazi movement?
I can only conclude by your continued evasiveness that you have something to hide.
But back on point:
http://www.npr.org/2011/03/10/134374...uslim-question"It's perfectly legitimate to investigate radicalism," says Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service. "There has been an increase in people drawn to these movements, and there has been a rapidity to their radicalization — though their numbers remain infinitesimal."
For his part, Lieberman has noted an acceleration of domestic incidents: Of 46 cases of "attempted homegrown Islamist terrorism" in the U.S. between 2001 and December 2009, he says, 13 occurred in 2009.
But the "community dimension" of King's hearing — formally led "The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response" — makes Hoffman, and others, uncomfortable.
That aspect of the hearings, Hoffman says, "might not be warranted by the facts."
The facts may argue the opposite, suggests expert Christopher Hewitt, author of Understanding Terrorism in America.
Hewitt, who tracks domestic terrorism plots, says most of the people who have been caught "have been caught by people in the mosques dropping a dime."
"I'm not sure what King thinks his shtick is going to be — who's he beating up?" says Hewitt, who, like Hoffman, has no argument with the congressman's efforts to look at the "real danger from Islamic extremists."
King is obviously playing to his cons uent's fears in his red-state, rural, Southern district.
Where are the moderate white people at?
Is King advocating the internment of Muslim-Americans?
No. He's just advocating stirring up prejudice to benefit himself.
Not to mention that here we are, almost ten years after 9-11, and we're still searching for the Islamic bogeyman.
But many neo-nazi's are advocating that and worse.
The fact that conservatives in this country 85% won't condemn the neo-nazi movement when they advocate gassing muslims, jews, and "darkies" says volumes.
Frankly, I don't think you do enough to disavow such criminal, terroristic behavior.
Since you can't deny that you are a neo-nazi, I can only conclude that if you knew about some neo-nazi plot you would not bother telling the police.
That seems to be a direct threat to our security, quite frankly.
Where was all of this outrage during the last 22 hearings on radical islam in the past 5 years?
Perhaps.
People that listen to the chatter may disagree with you.
Fear the chatter. Spend 25% of the federal budget, 5% of GDP, and abridge civil liberties and give rent a cops at the airport the green light to stick their hand in your crotch because of the chatter.
Just because our strategy borders on incompetence doesn't mean the threats aren't real.
Where was all your outrage when neo-nazis are beating people to death, and killing people in robberies to finance weapons purchases?
Do you know of any of those plots? Would you admit it even if you did?
Please answer the question for the committee.
And this years' academy award for best actor goes to......
Keith Ellison at the 13:00 mark.
Perhaps because those other hearings weren't obviously ideologically driven bull by people who have obviously made up their minds long before hand?
Might they have *gasp* actually been to simply find out information, rather than make a slilted point?
Do you have any data that contradicts those statements?
The facts may argue the opposite, suggests expert Christopher Hewitt, author of Understanding Terrorism in America.
Hewitt, who tracks domestic terrorism plots, says most of the people who have been caught "have been caught by people in the mosques dropping a dime."
"I'm not sure what King thinks his shtick is going to be — who's he beating up?" says Hewitt, who, like Hoffman, has no argument with the congressman's efforts to look at the "real danger from Islamic extremists."
He's a Muslim, so you think he wants to kill you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
