Stop panicking. Situation is worse than TMI, but far from Chernobyl level drama.
Building that blew up wasn't much more than a warehouse to keep the workers&equipment dry. Explosion was almost certainly either pressure release (steam) or ignition of hydrogen.
Reactor in question was built in 1970 (GE Mark I BWR) and is relatively small (440 MW of electrical power), so they simply didn't bother with pouring tons of concrete over it. Main containment for this type is under the now missing roof, hopefully (relatively) undamaged. While we're at it - there is no engineer in the world that would willingly design a square pressure vessel. Too much weak spots. They're usually either spherical or cylindrical.
Radioactivity monitoring data are online for both Fukushima installations, but the data for Daiichi site is not being updated since the earthquake (yup, unfortunate & a bit fishy)
Fukushima-Daiichi
Fukushima-Daini
There was a e this morning, they either vented the pressure or had some rainfall. Either way, radiation levels were in range of a solid rainstorm.
And general site with info:
http://www.nuctrans.org/Nuc_Trans/lo...apan/japan.htm
Update:
From BBC news-stream:
Noriyuki Shikata, deputy cabinet secretary for public relations for the Japanese prime minister tweets: "Blast was caused by ac ulated hydrogen combined with oxygen in the space between container and outer structure. No damage to container."
Best possible scenario, there is high possibility that cooling piping is still OK.