Reply With Quote
Neal cause he can score in any quarter......oh and his pay to productivity ratio is outstanding..
Neal
Terry
On a pure skillset and effort consideration, who would you rather have coming off the bench for the Spurs? Honestly...
Neal cause he can score in any quarter......oh and his pay to productivity ratio is outstanding..
Agreed, Neal makes barely 500k. Terry is 10 million plus. No comparison on pay/production ratio there.
In addition to the salary issue, Jason Terry is absolutely not clutch, he's known for playoff failures despite his bluster, he's seven years older than Gary Neal, and he's a thug. Apologies to the OP, but fail poll.
Obstructed, ouch. I agree it's Neal, but if you look at the overall stats, Terry is still an elite bench man. I don't agree that it's a hands down fail.
Is this a real question? Not only does Neal currently provide exponentially more value/dollar than Terry, he is also objectively worth a higher salary than Terry because for the most part Terry is trash.
Jet 16.3 ppg, 2 RPG, 4.2 APG
Neal 9.5 ppg, RPG 2.5, APG 1.1
I wasn't considering punk at ude as part of the analysis here. Simply, who would you rather have off the bench on a skill/hustle level. Stats are in favor of Jet.
Nope, sorry. See the bold.
If you aren't going to consider his punk at ude, then it's not realistic. Terry's a punk, and has been since he was in Atlanta. load of talent? Yep. of a shooter? Uh huh. Sixth man of the year? Absolutely. Would I trade them straight up even if Dallas paid his contract? Nope.
Did anyone checkout the on-ball defense Neal threw down on Barea in Friday's game?
Scoring
Defense
Mental toughness
Dribble penetration
Team Player
Non media
This isn't even close. Gotta Neal with it.
Taking away the personality issues, Terry also is often their second offensive option while Neal (even with Pop's blessing to shoot) is never more than 3rd or fourth depending on who is in the game. The question is could Neal be as productive as Terry in the number two role? Possibly, but probably not.
But in the big picture Neal is younger, a better fit and cheaper so its easily Neal.
But, if you were to wave the money side the question becomes more difficult.
That said, Terry is an ass and I wouldn't want him on my team.
Terry is the textbook case why barking and woofing doesn't mean . If they tracked clutch fail to trash talk ratio, Terry would lead the league annually.
Check per 36 minutes stats, they're pretty even
If Jason Terry existed with his stats, in a vacuum, I would say Terry. But alas, that is not the world we live in. In the real world, Terry has a horrible at ude and it shows in every facet of his being. His facial expressions, his consistantly dirty play, the way he runs his mouth in pre/post game interviews, etc. I wouldnt even have him on my bench.
One question: are you ing serious?
But HEART in favor of Neal. I have always been a Spurs fan and always will be but if the Spurs EVER signed Terry I think I would have to consider turning around and walking away from my beloved team. Now Nowitski I would welcome into the Spurs organization! That would bring us 2 or 3 more championships before Duncan hangs 'em up.
lol ratface on the spurs, i just threw up a little
Jason Terry has done a lot more for the underprivileged and homeless than Gary Neal has. He's also never raped someone. So much for character or at ude issues.
Says the troll with Odens pubes in his sig, lol.
terry wouldn't fit our system, so neal
That has nothing to do with the topic, troll.
neal did not rape anyone the chargers were dropped
If you want to discuss the Chargers, there's an NFL forum here at Spurstalk.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
