Is that how you view this forum? A battlefield for your wit?
This is why you can't beat me in a battle of wits. You're too predictable. Do me a favor and drag-and-highlight my "hurt" reply.
Is that how you view this forum? A battlefield for your wit?
Truth is a guy in your shoes needs a place like Spurstalk. This is why you go into full got-mode when Kori threatens you with exile.
Seriously, what would you do?
Butthurt reply number 4 in this thread.
I ride and die for my s
On the other hand my psychological condition does not allow me to ignore anyone. I have to be a winner.![]()
Butthurt reply number 5 in this thread.
No Edward, everyone doesn't take Spurstalk as seriously as you. I think your antics are amusing but also disturbing. I just like how you talk to Kori like you have the intention of talking about basketball here (a facade) in order to maintain your status.
Anyway, History. I hope I taught you a lesson about how to troll.
To prevent yourself from being regulated in the future, I suggest you follow these guidelines.
- Understand that Spurfan and Mavfan are your betters and always address them as sir.
- Know your place.
- Know when to cut your losses.
- Lurk more.
- Work on shrinking that massive ego of yours to a relatively normal size. This will prevent you from overrating your intelligence and abilities, which will keep you on guard more so that you don't walk into anymore traps, like the ones I set for you.
- Quit being a got.
I promise to keep those things in mind if you also:
- Understand that Spurstalk is not the real world.
- Writing posts on Spurstalk does not make you a writer
- Kobe > Duncan
- Lakers > Spurs
- 3p Chucking teams never win the championship
How serious is that? Serious enough to, say, look online for information about a fellow poster? Just wondering where the "serious" line gets drawn.
Same question applies to the "disturbing" line.
Lol, no.
Creating a forum where you get ted on day and night does not make you better.![]()
The 'ole declaring victory for yourself move. Lakers fans are the whipping boys of this forum, yourself at the top of the list.
what's worse..welshing or sex with underage girls and boys...it's a rhetorical question btw....
Pretty easy to find when you led the search "midnightpulp". I'm sure it took all of a 10 second search.
After ten plus years on the internet, you have learned how to use the "Search" function, haven't you?
You can't even keep your word, so yeah, I believe you would have sex with underage kids.![]()
My , send that trick to the tree of woe
Ha! Almost a touche.
But I asked you where you thought "serious/disturbing" lines are. I don't think it's serious or disturbing to dig up info on annoying posters. You stated you did, though.
..........
........
..........
......
........
..........
......
........
....
........
![]()
The disturbing is conducting an artificial argument with one self.
What do you think of Midget's proposal to lower the age of consent?
Eh, if there's a reason for it (ie. pretending you're responding to one of your own trolls), then it's not too disturbing. Otherwise, yes.
I saw that link posted, but didn't go over it. From what I saw, he mentioned that the legal age of consent, historically speaking, was much lower in the past than it is now.
What age did he advocate lowering consent to?
To the same age that over half of the civilized world thinks proper: 14.
I also favor the legalization of all drugs, so I guess that means I condone drug use, according to Carl Jaspers logic.
and if they lowered the age then I'm sure you'd fight to have your convictions over turned and your record expunged![]()
and another thing...I'll gladly be considered a Welsher any day over supporting someone openly advocating the molestation of little girls....you sad dawg...no really....and mama would never agree with me publicly but I'm sure she feels the same way....Perv...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)