Reply With Quote
I agree, as chazley has shown, bonner is key to our championship hopes, that 50% from 3 is our secret weapon. Its time to Unleash The Ginger!!
I think you're spot on Chazley. In reality, Bonner is under utilized. He should be taking at least 10-12 three point attempts per game. With his high 3 pt. percentage, that would give him somewhere between 14 to 17 points per game. That would be huge for the Spurs come playoffs!
I agree, as chazley has shown, bonner is key to our championship hopes, that 50% from 3 is our secret weapon. Its time to Unleash The Ginger!!
Wasn't Roger Mason the thing the Spurs needed?
Luckily we got Gary Neal, or else we would've needed him.
I don't take idiots seriously. Guess it's a wash. Get some facts or GTFO
not sure where you get that Bonner is the 8th rotation player - he's at least 7th and if Hill keeps playing as poorly as he has, Bonner should be able to move up to 6th.
I know it was mentioned earlier in the year, but do you think Bonner still has a chance at Most Improved Player?
Nah this would be stupid. He's perfect as a good 7th/8th man on a contending team taking his 4-5 shots per game.
lol troll is mad
lol idiot is mad that I exposed him.
What are the facts exaclty - Bonner is part of the best defensive lineups that the Spurs have?
If the Spurs rank 12th in points allowed and 12th in FG% allowed, what does that mean?
You're going about this the wrong way - the Spurs are no longer a great defensive team - at least not top 10.
Their strength is in their offensive ability and the reality is that The Red Rocket has not been turned loose yet. Give him 10-12 attempts per game and his points per game could jump as much as 10 points per game. He'd be extremely valuable to the Spurs offense then.
He's been such a huge boost for the Knicks.
now I'm confused - Bonner scoring more points per game would be stupid?
You clearly describing yourself, #1 poster lol, thats shows a re troll if there ever was one.
haha, just saw this.. explain please (should be good).
Read my sig if you wanna remember who won this argument before the season.
I'm super in glad we have Gary Neal, he's 10x the player Mason will ever be, but if we didn't have Neal, I would want Mason on the Spurs.
I'd like to see that explanation too - because at this point, I'm not sure what the conclusion has been.
Is it that Bonner shouldn't have a bad rap as a poor defensive player because, according to statistics, he's usually on the floor when the Spurs' mediorcre defense does its best?
Wow - we have a winner.
My argument/conclusion is that Pop and the Spurs organization are smarter than all of us, and it's funny that people on Spurstalk think otherwise.
Go back and read my Mason thread if you want to see where I annihilated all the naysayers about Mason. Ask Obstructed how that went.
The fact that you make stupid statements and continue to restate them over and over until people get tired of trying to get you to see reason doesn't mean you won anything. The only thing to take from your signature is that I rightfully pegged you as a troll and an attention from your first post. Anyone who reads the bolded part above doesn't even need to bother to read the thread to know who lost that argument.
It's not the folks on the internet forums that Pop needs to be smarter than - it's the other teams in the NBA.
Since he's changed his philosophy in favor of offense over defense, he hasn't quite been able to outsmart them yet.
Probably much like this one. Chazley makes a declaration that's moronic and indefensible, designed to draw lots of people to disagree with it (trolling). When there aren't any other threads to post in, people argue with him. He doesn't listen to anything anyone says, instead posting strawman arguments and insults, continually attempting to get the last word on anyone, regardless of whether or not it is relevant to the conversation. Then when people get tired of his , or if actual interesting threads start coming up, people abandon him and he declares victory.
If you'd like proof, Chazley still thinks Roger Mason would have been good for the Spurs.
That's ironic, since most people are smarter than you are. It's funny that you think otherwise.
lol "I would want Mason on the spurs" this troll is more re ed than I thought, definetly out of touch with reality
no thanks - I already fell dumb for arguing with a laker fan about Bonner, much less about Mason.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions