Reply With Quote
News coverage of this milk "contamination" is really embarassing. The level is 5000 times lower (5000 times LOWER) than a level that would even be of concern. Diane Sawyer just had an MD on an asked "Is is really safe to drink the milk?".
Face palm
Your a scientist you should be able to stomach a photo of a radiation victim. Or did you skip that class?
If you think by me posting on the fly is a sign I am heated you have allot to learn about me pal.I got a rise out of you, and more importantly a very abbreviated response.
I guess this is further evidence your here for s and giggles and to push peoples buttons?I'd say I passed with flying colors.
If you can find humor in my postings then you wasted your time going to Darwin....errrr I meant Science academy you should be a talent scout for SNL.For the record, I do admire your humor. I just find it to be out of place here (in this thread).
I am sure your chicken little poster will be a huge hit.
News coverage of this milk "contamination" is really embarassing. The level is 5000 times lower (5000 times LOWER) than a level that would even be of concern. Diane Sawyer just had an MD on an asked "Is is really safe to drink the milk?".
Face palm
You wouldn't know about contaminated milk if you spent all night sucking on some Japs .
I actually don't drink milk, so I'm "safe".
Cheers!
List of nuclear accidents
This article lists notable civilian accidents involving nuclear material or nuclear reactors.
1950s
December 12, 1952 — INES Level 5[citation needed] - Chalk River, Ontario, Canada - Reactor core damaged
A reactor shutoff rod failure, combined with several operator errors, led to a major power excursion of more than double the reactor's rated output at AECL's NRX reactor. The operators purged the reactor's heavy water moderator, and the reaction stopped in under 30 seconds. A cover gas system failure led to hydrogen explosions, which severely damaged the reactor core. The fission products from approximately 30 kg of uranium were released through the reactor stack. Irradiated light-water coolant leaked from the damaged coolant circuit into the reactor building; some 4,000 cubic meters were pumped via pipeline to a disposal area to avoid contamination of the Ottawa River. Subsequent monitoring of surrounding water sources revealed no contamination. No immediate fatalities or injuries resulted from the incident; a 1982 followup study of exposed workers showed no long-term health effects. Future U.S. President Jimmy Carter, then a Lieutenant in the US Navy, was among the cleanup crew.[1]
October 10, 1957 - INES Level 5 - Windscale, bria, Great Britain - Core fire
The graphite core of a British nuclear [weapons programme] reactor at Windscale, berland (now Sellafield, bria) caught fire, releasing substantial amounts of radioactive contamination into the surrounding area. The event, known as the Windscale fire, was the worst nuclear accident in Great Britain.
May 24, 1958 — INES Level needed - Chalk River, Ontario, Canada - Fuel damaged
Due to inadequate cooling a damaged uranium fuel rod caught fire and was torn in two as it was being removed from the core at the NRU reactor. The fire was extinguished, but not before radioactive combustion products contaminated the interior of the reactor building and, to a lesser degree, an area surrounding the laboratory site. Over 600 people were employed in the clean-up.[2][3]
October 25, 1958 - INES Level needed - Vinča, Yugoslavia - Criticality excursion, irradiation of personnel
During a subcritical counting experiment a power buildup went undetected at the Vinca Nuclear Ins ute's zero-power natural uranium heavy water moderated research reactor.[4] Saturation of radiation detection chambers gave the researchers false readings and the level of moderator in the reactor tank was raised triggering a criticality excursion which a researcher detected from the smell of ozone.[5] Six scientists received radiation doses of 2—4 Sv (200—400 rems) [6] (p. 96). An experimental bone marrow transplant treatment was performed on all of them in France and five survived, despite the ultimate rejection of the marrow in all cases. A single woman among them later had a child without apparent complications. This was one of the first nuclear incidents investigated by then newly-formed IAEA.[7]
July 26, 1959 — INES Level needed - Santa Susana Field Laboratory, California, United States - Partial meltdown
A partial core meltdown may have taken place when the Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) experienced a power excursion that caused severe overheating of the reactor core, resulting in the melting of one-third of the nuclear fuel and significant releases of radioactive gases. [8]
[edit] 1960s
July 24, 1964 - INES Level needed - Charlestown, Rhode Island, United States - Criticality Accident
An error by a worker at a United Nuclear Corporation fuel facility led to an accidental criticality. Robert Peabody, believing he was using a diluted uranium solution, accidentally put concentrated solution into an agitation tank containing sodium carbonate. Peabody was exposed to 10,000rad (100Gy) of radiation and died two days later. Ninety minutes after the criticality, a plant manager and another administrator returned to the building and were exposed to 100rad (1Gy), but suffered no ill effects.[9][10]
October 5, 1966 — INES Level needed - Monroe, Michigan, United States - Partial meltdown
A sodium cooling system malfunction caused a partial meltdown at the Enrico Fermi demonstration nuclear breeder reactor (Enrico Fermi-1 fast breeder reactor). The accident was attributed to a zirconium fragment that obstructed a flow-guide in the sodium cooling system. Two of the 105 fuel assemblies melted during the incident, but no contamination was recorded outside the containment vessel.[11]
Winter 1966-1967 (date unknown) – INES Level needed – location unknown – loss of coolant accident
The Soviet icebreaker Lenin, the USSR’s first nuclear-powered surface ship, suffered a major accident (possibly a meltdown — exactly what happened remains a matter of controversy in the West) in one of its three reactors. To find the leak the crew broke through the concrete and steel radiation shield with sledgehammers, causing irreparable damage. It was rumored that around 30 of the crew were killed. The ship was abandoned for a year to allow radiation levels to drop before the three reactors were removed, to be dumped into the Tsivolko Fjord on the Kara Sea, along with 60% of the fuel elements packed in a separate container. The reactors were replaced with two new ones, and the ship re-entered service in 1970, serving until 1989.
May 1967 — INES Level needed - Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland, United Kingdom - Partial meltdown
Graphite debris partially blocked a fuel channel causing a fuel element to melt and catch fire at the Chapelcross nuclear power station. Contamination was confined to the reactor core. The core was repaired and restarted in 1969, operating until the plant's shutdown in 2004.[12][13]
January 21, 1969 — INES Level needed - Lucens, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland - Explosion
A total loss of coolant led to a power excursion and explosion of an experimental nuclear reactor in a large cave at Lucens. The underground location of this reactor acted like a containment building and prevented any outside contamination. The cavern was heavily contaminated and was sealed. No injuries or fatalities resulted.[14][15]
[edit] 1970s
December 7, 1975 – INES Level 3 - Greifswald, Germany (then East Germany) - Partly damaged
Operators disabled three of six cooling pumps' electrical supply circuits to test emergency shutoffs. Instead of the expected automatic shutdown, a fourth pump failed causing excessive heating which damaged ten fuel rods. The accident was attributed to sticky relay contacts and generally poor construction in the Soviet-built reactor.[16]
February 22, 1977 – INES Level 4 - Jaslovské Bohunice, Czechoslovakia - Fuel damaged
Operators neglected to remove moisture-absorbing materials from a fuel rod assembly before loading it into the KS 150 reactor at power plant A-1. The accident resulted in damaged fuel integrity, extensive corrosion damage of fuel cladding and release of radioactivity into the plant area. The affected reactor was decommissioned following this accident.[17]
March 28, 1979 – INES Level 5[citation needed] - Middletown, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, United States - Partial meltdown
Equipment failures and worker mistakes contributed to a loss of coolant and a partial core meltdown at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 15 km (9 miles) southeast of Harrisburg. While the reactor was extensively damaged, on-site radiation exposure was under 100 millirems (less than annual exposure due to natural sources). Area residents received a smaller exposure of 1 millirem (10 µSv), or about 1/3 the dose from eating a banana per day for one year. There were no fatalities. Follow-up radiological studies predict between zero and one long-term cancer fatality.[18][19][20]
See also: Three Mile Island accident
[edit] 1980s
March 13, 1980 - INES Level 4 - Orléans, France - Nuclear materials leak
A brief power excursion in Reactor A2 led to a rupture of fuel bundles and a minor release (8 x 1010 Bq) of nuclear materials at the Saint-Laurent Nuclear Power Plant. The reactor was repaired and continued operation until its decommissioning in 1992.[21]
March, 1981 — INES Level 2 - Tsuruga, Japan - Radioactive materials released into Sea of Japan + Overexposure of workers
More than 100 workers were exposed to doses of up to 155 millirem per day radiation during repairs of the Tsuruga Nuclear Power Plant, violating the Japan Atomic Power Company's limit of 100 millirems (1 mSv) per day.[22]
January 25, 1982 - INES Level unknown - Ontario, New York - Radioactive materials released
A steam pipe burst at the Ginna Nuclear Generating Station, resulting in a loss of coolant and gasses were intentionally vented to the atmosphere to reduce risks of explosion.
September 23, 1983 — INES Level 4 - Buenos Aires, Argentina - Accidental criticality
An operator error during a fuel plate reconfiguration in an experimental test reactor led to an excursion of 3×1017 fissions at the RA-2 facility. The operator absorbed 2000 rad (20 Gy) of gamma and 1700 rad (17 Gy) of neutron radiation which killed him two days later. Another 17 people outside of the reactor room absorbed doses ranging from 35 rad (0.35 Gy) to less than 1 rad (0.01 Gy).[23] pg103[24]
April 26, 1986 — INES Level 7 - Prypiat, Ukraine (then USSR) - Power excursion, explosion, complete meltdown
An inadequate reactor safety system[25] led to an uncontrolled power excursion, causing a severe steam explosion, meltdown and release of radioactive material at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant located approximately 100 kilometers north-northwest of Kiev. Approximately fifty fatalities (mostly cleanup personnel) resulted from the accident and the immediate aftermath. An additional nine fatal cases of thyroid cancer in children in the Chernobyl area have been attributed to the accident. The explosion and combustion of the graphite reactor core spread radioactive material over much of Europe. 100,000 people were evacuated from the areas immediately surrounding Chernobyl in addition to 300,000 from the areas of heavy fallout in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. An "Exclusion Zone" was created surrounding the site encompassing approximately 1,000 mi² (3,000 km²) and deemed off-limits for human habitation for an indefinite period. Several studies by governments, UN agencies and environmental groups have estimated the consequences and eventual number of casualties. Their findings are subject to controversy.
See also: Chernobyl disaster
May 4, 1986 – INES Level needed - Hamm-Uentrop, Germany (then West Germany) - Fuel damaged
A spherical fuel pebble became lodged in the pipe used to deliver fuel elements to the reactor at an experimental 300-megawatt THTR-300 HTGR. Attempts by an operator to dislodge the fuel pebble damaged its cladding, releasing radiation detectable up to two kilometers from the reactor.[26]
October 19, 1989 – INES Level 3 - Vandellos Nuclear Power Plant, Spain -fire in one of its two turbogenerators
After the fire in the turbogenerators the Spanish comission determined a large list of issues in the plant that was closed by the owners due to economical unviability.
[edit] 1990s
April 6, 1993 — INES Level 4 - Tomsk, Russia - Explosion
A pressure buildup led to an explosive mechanical failure in a 34 cubic meter stainless steel reaction vessel buried in a concrete bunker under building 201 of the radiochemical works at the Tomsk-7 Siberian Chemical Enterprise plutonium reprocessing facility. The vessel contained a mixture of concentrated nitric acid, uranium (8757 kg), plutonium (449 g) along with a mixture of radioactive and organic waste from a prior extraction cycle. The explosion dislodged the concrete lid of the bunker and blew a large hole in the roof of the building, releasing approximately 6 GBq of Pu 239 and 30 TBq of various other radionuclides into the environment. The contamination plume extended 28 km NE of building 201, 20 km beyond the facility property. The small village of Georgievka (pop. 200) was at the end of the fallout plume, but no fatalities, illnesses or injuries were reported. The accident exposed 160 on-site workers and almost two thousand cleanup workers to total doses of up to 50 mSv (the threshold limit for radiation workers is 100 mSv per 5 years).[27][28][29]
June, 1999 — INES Level 2[30] - Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan - Control rod malfunction
Operators attempting to insert one control rod during an inspection neglected procedure and instead withdrew three causing a 15 minute uncontrolled sustained reaction at the number 1 reactor of Shika Nuclear Power Plant. The Hokuriku Electric Company who owned the reactor did not report this incident and falsified records, covering it up until March, 2007.[31]
September 30, 1999 — INES Level 4 - Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan - Accidental criticality
Inadequately trained part-time workers prepared a uranyl nitrate solution containing about 16.6 kg of uranium, which exceeded the critical mass, into a precipitation tank at a uranium reprocessing facility in Tokai-mura northeast of Tokyo, Japan. The tank was not designed to dissolve this type of solution and was not configured to prevent eventual criticality. Three workers were exposed to (neutron) radiation doses in excess of allowable limits. Two of these workers died. 116 other workers received lesser doses of 1 mSv or greater though not in excess of the allowable limit.[32][33][34][35]
See also: Tokaimura nuclear accident
[edit] 2000s
April 10, 2003 — INES Level 3 - Paks, Hungary - Fuel damaged
Partially spent fuel rods undergoing cleaning in a tank of heavy water ruptured and spilled fuel pellets at Paks Nuclear Power Plant. It is suspected that inadequate cooling of the rods during the cleaning process combined with a sudden influx of cold water thermally shocked fuel rods causing them to split. Boric acid was added to the tank to prevent the loose fuel pellets from achieving criticality. Ammonia and hydrazine were also added to absorb iodine-131.[36]
April 19, 2005 — INES Level 3 - Sellafield, England, United Kingdom - Nuclear material leak
20 metric tons of uranium and 160 kilograms of plutonium dissolved in 83,000 litres of nitric acid leaked over several months from a cracked pipe into a stainless steel sump chamber at the Thorp nuclear fuel reprocessing plant. The partially processed spent fuel was drained into holding tanks outside the plant.[37][38]
November 2005 — INES Level needed - Braidwood, Illinois, United States - Nuclear material leak
Tritium contamination of groundwater was discovered at Exelon's Braidwood station. Groundwater off site remains within safe drinking standards though the NRC is requiring the plant to correct any problems related to the release.[39]
March 6, 2006 — INES Level 2[40] - Erwin, Tennessee, United States - Nuclear material leak
Thirty-five litres of a highly enriched uranium solution leaked during transfer into a lab at Nuclear Fuel Services Erwin Plant. The incident caused a seven-month shutdown. A required public hearing on the licensing of the plant was not held due to the absence of public notification.[41][42][43][44]
[edit] 2010s
See also: Timeline of the Fukushima nuclear accidents
March 11-20, 2011 - INES Level 5[45] , previously 4[46] or higher (6[47][48][49] as of March 15 according to Andre-Claude Lacoste, president of France's nuclear safety authority. It is not an official rating[50])
Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, Japan - Overheating, explosions, fire, radioactivity emergency
Main article: Fukushima I nuclear accidents
After the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami of March 11, the emergency power supply of the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant failed. This was followed by deliberate releases of radioactive gas from reactors 1 and 2 to relieve pressure. On March 12, triggered by falling water levels, a hydrogen explosion occurred at reactor 1, resulting in the collapse of the concrete outer structure.[51][52][53][54][55] Although the reactor containment itself was confirmed to be intact,[56][57][58] the hourly radiation from the plant reached 1,015 microsievert (0.1015 rem) - an amount equivalent to that allowable for ordinary people in one year."[59][60] Residents of the Fukushima area were advised to stay inside, close doors and windows, turn off air conditioning, and to cover their mouths with masks, towels or handkerchiefs as well as not to drink tap water.[61] By the evening of March 12, the exclusion zone had been extended to 20 kilometres (12 mi) around the plant[62] and 70,000 to 80,000 people had been evacuated from homes in northern Japan.[63] A second, nearly identical hydrogen explosion occured in the reactor building for Unit 3 on March 14, with similar effects.[64] A third explosion in the “pressure suppression room” of Unit 2[65] initially was said not to have breached the reactor’s inner steel containment vessel,[66] but later reports indicated that the explosion damaged the steel containment structure of Unit 2 and much larger releases of radiation were expected than previously.[65]
Disposed rods of reactor Unit 4 were stored outside the reactor in a separate pool which ran dry, yielding fire and risk of serious contamination.[67]
Staff was brought down from 800 Fukishima, who have been named the "Fukishima 50" by the press.[67] Events are still developing.
March 11-13, 2011 - INES Level 3[68], Fukushima II Nuclear Power Plant, Japan - Overheating, possible radioactivity emergency
After the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami of March 11, the cooling systems for three reactors (numbers 1, 2 and 4) of the Fukushima-Daini nuclear power plant were compromised due to damage from the tsunami.[69] Nuclear Engineering International reported that all four units were successfully automatically shut down, but emergency diesel generators at the site were Damaged by the 9.2 magnitude earthquake[70] People were evacuated around 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) from the plant. An evacuation order was issued, because of possible radioactive contamination.
So how many atoms of iodine-131 must be in a mol with such a high rate of decay to produce measurable results at the x times 10e-12 level?
What would those prove? That I own a cool looking lab jacket and pocket protector?
Try looking at my prior posts in this thread. Those speak for themselves.
My PM is open to anyone who has questions. What warning? What dangers lie ahead?
lol Jack Lemmon
Just be grateful that I haven't begun citing any journal articles. The is really gonna hit the fan then.
Oh, and people are being exposed to deadly radiation. Helping them is gonna require a lot more sunscreen than I can afford though.
MIT? That explains a lot.
Sooooo, educate me. What am I missing here?
Good list. Is there a point to it?
Irrelevant. Your pictures still make no sense given the information at hand. Try again.
I'm sure that you're a barrel of laughs in person.
Looking in the mirror as you posted this?
Actually, I find them to be macabre and laden with cynicism. Especially the ones with pictures.
Better?
Yes Mr. Scientist there is. Maybe you and your slide rule can figure it out.
If you have to have your arm twisted to post a pic of yourself that alone speaks volumes.
Maybe you can photoshop yourself sitting next to someone of the opposite sex so I don't feel so awkward with you stalking me.
Try looking at my prior posts in this thread. Those speak for themselves.
I will later tonight when I need help trying to fall asleep
I know your style, allot of book smarts .....your just lacking in common sense.
Are you single, whats your favorite color?My PM is open to anyone who has questions
What warning?What dangers lie ahead?I was hoping you got that one. (you do know the reference?)lol Jack Lemmon
Hey all BS aside I debate to maybe learn and thing or two and help educate. It's about time you do the same brah!Just be grateful that I haven't begun citing any journal articles. The is really gonna hit the fan then.
You know you shouldn't downplay radiation no matter how small and the source take this serious dude.Oh, and people are being exposed to deadly radiation. Helping them is gonna require a lot more sunscreen than I can afford though.
Hey I go into it 3 days after I arrived. If not for a gay professor who was tight with members of the board I woulds have had to provide better test scores and GPO.MIT? That explains a lot.
I really stayed because I was getting laid and i had a sweet speed/crank connection in San Antonio. I mainly hung out with the reverse engineering club, the evil one the ones who "break the rules/laws"
You don't know what fun is until you take apart an Apple II with a room full of pot and a fridge full of beer.
Well lets do the math........Sooooo, educate me. What am I missing here?
Japan has explosion at the Nuclear power plant. I tell you and others it's serious you tell them its not
Later they say its serious. I say they need to bury it in lead and cement, you said they don't need to. They come out and say that is what they are going to do.
I said the radiation will spread throughout America and that
food and milk will show up radiation in the next three weeks. you and others say I am a re now the News is backing my claims.
I would say my batting average is up there. How about you tell me about the DU used in desert storm.
If you find them in bad taste I will remove them but don't say they are Irrelevant. they show radiation damage this is a radiation topic.
So then roll out the barrel.I'm sure that you're a barrel of laughs in person.
And I see the man in the mirror.Looking in the mirror as you posted this?
macabre? are you serious? Are you wearing a red turtleneck sweater with a pipe in your mouth while sipping hot tea?Actually, I find them to be macabre and laden with cynicism. Especially the ones with pictures.
Don't worry i have nothing against you Shepperd's pie eating britt's.
my screen name is a pc mouse not a rodent. If you went to the last Home brew meeting you would know that esse!Better?
Mouse, the more words you try to use, the less you make sense.
Maybe you should stick to conspiracy theories. You understand them better than real science.
That was weak dude, at least show some effort and try to prove me wrong or pull out your slide rule and paste some . I told your taint sniffing ass two weeks ago the food will be contaminated and your inbred ass laughed, now you don't have the almonds to give me props? read more post less.
BTW where did Professor Whoopee run off to?
I had a question about Desert Storm.
hey mouse i know you love some do entaries...
watch this and let me know how you feel about it
http://topdo entaryfilms.com/disco...hecus-ramidus/
Are there tsunami currently occurring in Japan?
I wouldn't call those levels contamination.
I'm here. Fire away. No pun intended.
They distort the reality of the current situation and inspire undue panic. I'd rather you leave them up so that everyone reading can know exactly what you're about.
A serious as a Fukushima radiation leak......
I'm not a brit btw. I do like tea and shepperds pie though.
Ahhhh yes, I'm not in with your clique. Perhaps that why you're having a hard time acknowledging my point of view?
Don't flatter yourself.
As opposed to not having any book smarts on this matter as well as lacking common sense?
Oh, I also recommend a couple of cookies and a glass of West Coast milk to help you sleep.
Married, Blue
I got it, hence the
I never maintained to know it all. If you have some credible info which leads you to post those pictures, I'm all ears. Thus far, we haven't seen any. It's idle speculation.
Who's downplaying it? I recommended you go back and look at my previous posts. My angle is one of cautious observation due to the lack of reliable info coming out of Japan. Besides that, all I did was to offer perspective.
I'll be sure to PM you the next time I run across one. My life suddenly feels emptier.
And this is at the heart of the matter. You haven't done any, and I strongly suspect you never will.
So there's I-131 in milk on the West coast? Why don't you calculate the exposure from drinking a pint for us? No? It would really help your argument if you could back your speculation with some numbers or ground truths.
Congrats on being on the correct side of a 50/50 call. Just as so many before you, now you know more more than the people on scene while having based your conclusion on nothing concrete.
Same as above. Perhaps you can shed some light on the significance. Try to do this without inundating us with more DU-baby pictures and fancy glowing milk advertisements. If you could please leave out the inaccurate dose maps, that would be great too.
I'd say your batting average is 1.000 based on the two arguments above. Your accuracy in portraying the situation as we know it to be now is 0.
What info can I share with you about U-238?
Mouse...
You just don't realize, you're being eaten alive. Do you?
I see what you did there.
Tell me why you haven't put your education to good use and maybe support the troops infected with DU?
Shhhhh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
