Guarantee a win tonight.

[chazley]

Please delete this thread. Please.

If you don't have anything to contribute then leave.

[chazley]

wow this guy is completelly out of touch

Good, solid post. Really liked the way you sidestepped the question, it was very smooth and subtle.

[mexicanjunior]

How do you know I'm not an NBA player?

Did your team have an off night?

[chazley]

yeah bro, u putting them in their places. good job.

Someone seeing the light.

[timtonymanu]

What's there to contribute? You're showing everyone that you didn't own up to your bet. We don't need stats or proof for that. You look like the fool here. But whatever, stick to your delusions that you "own" everyone. If that is all that's going for you in life, then so be it.

[Chachachango]

haha, April fools.

[Chieflion]

How do you know I'm not an NBA player?

I thought you said you were not Roger Mason Jr.

[ElNono]

Someone seeing the light.

I thought you were gone... welcher

[timtonymanu]

chazley with the self ownage. Add that to your sig, .

[chazley]

I thought you were gone... welcher

Already told you, I like the grape too much to stay away.

[chazley]

chazley with the self ownage. Add that to your sig, .

Not seeing any self ownage.

[chazley]

What's there to contribute? You're showing everyone that you didn't own up to your bet. We don't need stats or proof for that. You look like the fool here. But whatever, stick to your delusions that you "own" everyone. If that is all that's going for you in life, then so be it.

I'm the only one in any argument who backs up my side with facts, while people I go against rely on 'what they see'.

Don't think any reasonable person would ever argue that facts/stats can be disproven by some non-professional saying they saw otherwise.

It's like saying bigfoot is real because some redneck in northern Idaho swears by it. I want proof before I go off someone saying they saw something. Cause 99% of the time, it's usually an illusion.

[Sean Cagney]

Chazley how was Bonner! Playoff form still! Great game from him.

[chazley]

Chazley how was Bonner! Playoff form still! Great game from him.

+2.

What's your point?

[Sean Cagney]

+2.

What's your point?

I said he sucked before and will continue to play like this and has in the playoffs etc. before, I knew it was coming and he keeps proving me right there. I wish when he was not hitting Pop would yank him, but no he can't help himself at all! It puzzles me.

[chazley]

I said he sucked before and will continue to play like this and has in the playoffs etc. before, I knew it was coming and he keeps proving me right there. I wish when he was not hitting Pop would yank him, but no he can't help himself at all! It puzzles me.

You know how I know your IQ is lower than 70?

You blame every loss on Matt Bonner.

Again, we outscored the Rockets and Celtics while Matt Bonner was on the floor.

What the are you saying? Where is your proof? Do you expect people to listed to your baseless garbage and take it as fact. Grow some balls and present some REAL facts and then we'll talk. You are by far the biggest airhead on Spurstalk and the most annoying poster here. That says ALOT when guys like Cessation post on Spurstalk, because that guy is a ing idiot.

[Chieflion]

So Matt Bonner had a +2. So, my math tells me that if he had made 40% of his shots (which would be about the average) instead of the 0%, he would have been a +8, right? And the rest of the Spurs who were in the game with him would also get the same, would they?

With that being the case, the Spurs were outscoring the Rockets despite Matt Bonner's misses. Am I still on the right track? Good, then honor your bet and log off and off.

[chazley]

So Matt Bonner had a +2. So, my math tells me that if he had made 40% of his shots (which would be about the average) instead of the 0%, he would have been a +8, right? And the rest of the Spurs who were in the game with him would also get the same, would they?

With that being the case, the Spurs were outscoring the Rockets despite Matt Bonner's misses. Am I still on the right track? Good, then honor your bet and log off and off.

You could use a better avatar.

So, basically you're agreeing with me. Thanks Chieflion!

[Cessation]

duncan 23 pts 13rbs
bonner 0 pts 0-5 from 3

According to chazley, ginger > duncan, because bonner has +2, and duncan has 0 +/-

lol re troll chazley

[DPG21920]

Why are you still posting?

[Sean Cagney]

You know how I know your IQ is lower than 70?

You blame every loss on Matt Bonner.

Again, we outscored the Rockets and Celtics while Matt Bonner was on the floor.

What the are you saying? Where is your proof? Do you expect people to listed to your baseless garbage and take it as fact. Grow some balls and present some REAL facts and then we'll talk. You are by far the biggest airhead on Spurstalk and the most annoying poster here. That says ALOT when guys like Cessation post on Spurstalk, because that guy is a ing idiot.

Ur a ing idiot! Where is my proof? 0-5 and he still gets heavy heavy mins ? LMFAO, good lord you are a ing idiot bro, go smack yourself silly. Where is your proof LMFAO HAHAHHAHA okay stats are not proof! Misses in key times are not proof? Are you his brother or wife? I am serious too.

Is this POP! POP glad to see you, defending your puppet! Thats the only thing I can see here because everyone else knows he is and should sit. LMFAO real facts, yet you show none just spew off some saying where is your proof and facts but you never say a thing yourself bro . I wish you would just quit got and fullfil your guarantee and dissapear. You are a ing idiot, sorry you have to be the dumbest to ever post in the history of Spurs boards and that includes trolls.

[Sean Cagney]

So Matt Bonner had a +2. So, my math tells me that if he had made 40% of his shots (which would be about the average) instead of the 0%, he would have been a +8, right? And the rest of the Spurs who were in the game with him would also get the same, would they?

With that being the case, the Spurs were outscoring the Rockets despite Matt Bonner's misses. Am I still on the right track? Good, then honor your bet and log off and off.

This dude is a ing dumbass man, his facts are a joke and ignore him, he has to be the biggest ing idiot on any forum in the history of Western Civilization , but he has his facts! He owns all! .

+2, well 0-5 got! Chew on that.

duncan 23 pts 13rbs
bonner 0 pts 0-5 from 3

According to chazley, ginger > duncan, because bonner has +2, and duncan has 0 +/-

lol re troll chazley

Oh yes his facts! All he can do is say +/-, but in reality you post his % and missing all his shots and he still posts his bull . What exactly did he do? He was lucky to be on the floor when others scored more than the other team so he gets a PLUS there when he did nothing but CHAZ has his stats!!!!!!!!! Someone ban this clown.

[Cessation]

I agree, chazley is definetly the worst poster on st.

[chazley]

duncan 23 pts 13rbs
bonner 0 pts 0-5 from 3

According to chazley, ginger > duncan, because bonner has +2, and duncan has 0 +/-

lol re troll chazley

Yea, that was my whole argument, Duncan<Bonner

Mind quoting where I said that?

I'll wait.

[chazley]

I agree, chazley is definetly the worst poster on st.

Thanks bud. Means alot coming from someone who has a smaller IQ than my dog.