Reply With Quote
lol owned on monoshow
Now we can wait for all the true tanking teams to fall into place (Mavs or is the Mavs case in reality a regression to the mean effect for an over-rated team with a paltry point differential under 4.0*?), Meanwhile, fans of the over-hyped but still tough Grizz or the Blazers should be somewhat ashamed of themselves but at least they seem to be trying - only NO fans can stand proud by SAS fans side these days for bringing it strong!
Note: LAL IMO not tanking just tired and disinterested these days (other than Bynum who has been phenomonal); and remains the only true threat in the West other than the Spurs so the WCF we all want - a battle between the two and the only, legit dynasties of the last 15 years in the NBA and the true dominant superstars in Duncan and Bryant will hopefully be settled on the court again. Game on for the playoffs!
*IMO yes the Mavs very over-rated and are the team the Spurs or LAL should be drooling to play in the 2nd round (if Mavs survive that long - if they fall to 4th Nuggets could well beat them or Portland or Memphis may well in the first anyway!
lol owned on monoshow
That was cringeworthy
Congrats on winning the West!
However, 4 les and no back to back over a time periord when another team in the west is winning more les is NOT A DYNASTY.
3 Back-2-Backs during this Century is the elephant in the room.
dynasty (noun)
1. a sequence of rulers from the same family, stock, or group: the Ming dynasty.
2. the rule of such a sequence.
3. a series of members of a family who are distinguished for their success, wealth, etc.
sequence (noun)
1. the following of one thing after another; succession.
2. order of succession: a list of books in alphabetical sequence.
2003, 2005, 2007 is basically missing 2004 and 2006 .........
Last edited by Ashy Larry; 04-07-2011 at 10:38 AM.
yeah but they would've won in 04 if not for starting the clock late on Fisher's shot, in 06 if not for Dirk getting fts, and 08 if not for Stern giving the Lakers Gasol
that same argument could be brought up with the early les with the Lakers ..... 1980, 1982, 1985 is missing 1981, 1983 and 1984 .... they did go back-to-back in 1987-88
O & 3!
David Stern the dynasty stopperyeah but they would've won in 04 if not for starting the clock late on Fisher's shot, in 06 if not for Dirk getting fts, and 08 if not for Stern giving the Lakers Gasol
O & 77!
O & 3!
those midgets from the other end of the state said uh, huh, not tonight.
How did Rummpd get owned on the mono show? What happened?
Cool Mavfan troll Gregory.yeah but they would've won in 04 if not for starting the clock late on Fisher's shot, in 06 if not for Dirk getting fts, and 08 if not for Stern giving the Lakers Gasol
owned by whom? Not. Today only non Spurs fans are only people being owned this time, Spurs fan x 20 years and have watched games in 8 countries and traveled over 800 miles to see games and respect all NBA fans who are loyal including nearly all Lakers fans, Thong II, and BRHornet types who constantly are there to either back or to take it in return on their team through the good times and bad. There are even a few Denver fans hanging around here and with that gutty coach and that team oriented group of semistars - they have a legit shot at a first round upset no matter whom they face.
The problem with most (but certainly not all) Mavs fans is they come and go with the wind, and keep bringing up the savior of the day, i.e, Roddy B (over-rated), Chandler (severely over-rated blocks less than an older Duncan in same minutes), and that Jet asshole. Some actually buy into Cuban as an owner or that Kidd can actually play defense still. Only Dirk and Caron have real cred on the Mavs and their only chance is if Caron comes back strong somehow and Dirk gets monster hot (which he is capable of and should be at least 3rd in the MVP for carrying the Mavs this year.)
Rump, weren't you one of the guys having a complete meltdown during the losing streak?
Spurfan:
Lakerfan:
Mavfan:
Yep, amonst many others, including The Dumper.
I see nothing wrong with this statement.yeah but they would've won in 04 if not for starting the clock late on Fisher's shot, in 06 if not for Dirk getting fts, and 08 if not for Stern giving the Lakers Gasol
Cept "would've" "if" x 2 & a "but" is kinda weak & puny.
Checking to see if this is posted somewhere else...
Don't bother. I'm watchin' my p's & q's with a fine tooth comb.
Don't forget Fisher tackling Barry in 2008 with no whistle thanks to our old pal Joey.yeah but they would've won in 04 if not for starting the clock late on Fisher's shot, in 06 if not for Dirk getting fts, and 08 if not for Stern giving the Lakers Gasol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
