Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 266
  1. 04-09-2011 #26
    LkrFan
    Veteran LkrFan's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    40,807
    Quote Originally Posted by Giuseppe
    Kobe is the constant in his own ringing.

    Pippen is the constant in MJ's ringing.
    Well well well - this haters.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote LkrFan is offline
  2. 04-09-2011 #27
    Isitjustme?
    Veteran Isitjustme?'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,832
    Ignore the fact that that doesn't even make sense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Isitjustme? is offline
  3. 04-09-2011 #28
    Isitjustme?
    Veteran Isitjustme?'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,832
    Man Laker fans are really down to the bottom of the barrel for when it comes to Kobe > MJ arguments...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Isitjustme? is offline
  4. 04-09-2011 #29
    Giuseppe
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
    Man Laker fans are really down to the bottom of the barrel for when it comes to Kobe > MJ arguments...
    Pippen, makin' like the elephant in the room is like shaved pussy.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Giuseppe is offline
  5. 04-09-2011 #30
    LkrFan
    Veteran LkrFan's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    40,807
    Quote Originally Posted by Giuseppe
    He's only "Gasoft" when it suits Spurs Fan, Lk.
    But of course
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote LkrFan is offline
  6. 04-09-2011 #31
    Giuseppe
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
    What does that have to do with anything?
    Jordan couldn't ring without Pippen.

    Kobe rang with & without Daddy.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Giuseppe is offline
  7. 04-09-2011 #32
    Koolaid_Man
    Controversy Koolaid_Man's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    41,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
    What does that have to do with anything?
    It means that Kobe calls his shots...He is the Common Denominator...as Pippen is for MJ....

    MJ Never won without Pippen...

    Kobe Won without Shaq and Without Gasol
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Koolaid_Man is offline
  8. 04-09-2011 #33
    LkrFan
    Veteran LkrFan's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    40,807
    Quote Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
    Kobe was doing a lot in 2006 and 2007...
    Individually, yes. But look at who he was rolling with:

    Smush (where is this guy anyway?)
    Kobe
    LO (inconsistent as back then. Kobe's Pippen my ass)
    Cook (doesn't even get 5 mpg with the Clips now)
    Kwame ('nuff said)

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote LkrFan is offline
  9. 04-09-2011 #34
    Giuseppe
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Koolaid_Man
    Kobe Won without Shaq [[[and Without Gasol]]]
    Kool, cleanin' up my .

    Kool Aid Man

    P.S., like he did when he delineated the 3 Back-2-Backs that I'd only counted as 2.

    P.S.s., I still have to write the gd equation down on paper in long hand to grasp it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Giuseppe is offline
  10. 04-09-2011 #35
    Giuseppe
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Quote Originally Posted by LkrFan
    Individually, yes. But look at who he was rolling with:

    Smush (where is this guy anyway?)
    Kobe
    LO (inconsistent as back then. Kobe's Pippen my ass)
    Cook (doesn't even get 5 mpg with the Clips now)
    Kwame ('nuff said)

    Odom didn't finally get straightened out once & for all until Buss signed off on Artest and Odom had to act like somebody. He'd still be drifting in the gd winds if he wasn't beholden to Artest.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Giuseppe is offline
  11. 04-09-2011 #36
    Reck
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    43,448
    Notice how kool misquotes the article.

    You can take on anybody, doesn't mean you're gonna win.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Reck is offline
  12. 04-09-2011 #37
    Zelophehad
    I believe in yesterday Zelophehad's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    1,322
    Jesus ing Christ, there are some re ed laker fans on this site. I mean for 's sake.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Zelophehad is offline
  13. 04-09-2011 #38
    Koolaid_Man
    Controversy Koolaid_Man's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    41,430
    Quote Originally Posted by lakaluva
    2005: "Kobe can't win without Shaq"

    2009: "Kobe can't win without Gasol"

    2012: "Kobe can't win without PJ"

    All the guy does is win.

    Imma save this for future reference....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Koolaid_Man is offline
  14. 04-09-2011 #39
    LkrFan
    Veteran LkrFan's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    40,807
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelophehad
    Jesus ing Christ, there are some re ed laker fans on this site. I mean for 's sake.
    No need to blaspheme. And stay off my profile page, cowtipping .
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote LkrFan is offline
  15. 04-09-2011 #40
    Giuseppe
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Quote Originally Posted by LkrFan
    And stay off my profile page, cowtipping .
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Giuseppe is offline
  16. 04-09-2011 #41
    Koolaid_Man
    Controversy Koolaid_Man's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    41,430
    Quote Originally Posted by LkrFan
    No need to blaspheme. And stay off my profile page, cowtipping .
    you a cold mutha er Lkrfan...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Koolaid_Man is offline
  17. 04-09-2011 #42
    dunkman
    Veteran dunkman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    3,408
    Of course Kobe could take MJ 1 on 1 when he was 40 because he moved in slow motion. Kobe wouldn't have a chance vs prime MJ, because MJ was better handling the rock, could score despite contact and was almost impossible to stop.

    As for Kobe's ringing, there was never doubt if MJ should be the finals MVP in any of his 6 championships. On the other hand, Shaq was the undisputed finals MVP in the Kobe's first 3 rings. Why? Because he was the Lakers best player during the threepeat and the offense run trough him. Kobe had a good finals in 2009 as Orlando didn't have a premier wing defender, however he played substandard in 2004, 2008 and 2010. It's not clear who should have gotten the 2010 finals MVP.

    He could do little against Prince, Allen and Pierce. MJ was better defensive player than them and, unlike Kobe, always played his best in the finals.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote dunkman is offline
  18. 04-09-2011 #43
    Koolaid_Man
    Controversy Koolaid_Man's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    41,430
    Quote Originally Posted by dunkman
    Of course Kobe could take MJ 1 on 1 when he was 40 because he moved in slow motion. Kobe wouldn't have a chance vs prime MJ, because MJ was better handling the rock, could score despite contact and was almost impossible to stop.

    As for Kobe's ringing, there was never doubt if MJ should be the finals MVP in any of his 6 championships. On the other hand, Shaq was the undisputed finals MVP in the Kobe's first 3 rings. Why? Because he was the Lakers best player during the threepeat and the offense run trough him. Kobe had a good finals in 2009 as Orlando didn't have a premier wing defender, however he played substandard in 2004, 2008 and 2010. It's not clear who should have gotten the 2010 finals MVP.

    He could do little against Prince, Allen and Pierce. MJ was better defensive player than them and, unlike Kobe, always played his best in the finals.

    and when MJ faced a great wing defender in the finals ( Gary Payton) he shot 26% in the final game similar to Kobe's 25% against Boston...

    come again....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Koolaid_Man is offline
  19. 04-09-2011 #44
    Riddler
    Believe. Riddler's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Post Count
    867
    Quote Originally Posted by LkrFan
    So let me get this straight, Pau "Gasoft" and Andrew "Glass Knees" Bynum is > prime Shaq?
    No, Bynum and Gasol are two of the best big men in the league, due to there not being many skilled big men in the league anymore.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Riddler is offline
  20. 04-09-2011 #45
    Riddler
    Believe. Riddler's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Post Count
    867
    Oh, and Jordan wouldn't have lost with 3 hall of famers against a team with no superstars in the Finals
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Riddler is offline
  21. 04-09-2011 #46
    Riddler
    Believe. Riddler's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Post Count
    867
    But then again, Jordan never lost in the finals, tee hee
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Riddler is offline
  22. 04-09-2011 #47
    Giuseppe
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Riddler
    But then again, Jordan never lost in the finals, tee hee
    & he never won a Finals without Pippen.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Giuseppe is offline
  23. 04-09-2011 #48
    Koolaid_Man
    Controversy Koolaid_Man's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    41,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Riddler
    But then again, Jordan never lost in the finals, tee hee

    well when you've been to more finals than MJ it's natural you'll lose more.....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Koolaid_Man is offline
  24. 04-09-2011 #49
    TampaDude
    Chillin' like a villain... TampaDude's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    20,120
    Quote Originally Posted by Koolaid_Man

    Kobe Won without Shaq and Without Gasol
    Nice misleading statement there. Kobe never rang without either Shaq or Gasol.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote TampaDude is offline
  25. 04-09-2011 #50
    Giuseppe
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaDude
    Nice misleading statement there. Kobe never rang without either Shaq or Gasol.
    Yeah, he did. He rang without Daddy, and without Gasol.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Giuseppe is offline
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules