48÷2(9+3) = ????

[MannyIsGod]

Really? Pick your choice of threads in the political forum. Off the top off my head I can think of you arguing with El Nono, Baseline Bum, From Way Downtown, Agloco, and Fuzzy Lumpkins. All about THEIR fields. Its amazing.

[Wild Cobra]

Really? Pick your choice of threads in the political forum. Off the top off my head I can think of you arguing with El Nono, Baseline Bum, From Way Downtown, Agloco, and Fuzzy Lumpkins. All about THEIR fields. Its amazing.

Of those you have selected, I have been wrong with El Nono several times. I don't recall arguing with Agloco, I agree with him. We had some clarifications that I see as just misunderstandings.

Am I wrong Agloco about this with you?

Are you claiming Fuzzy is right and I'm wrong about electronics? No F'n way. The one exception is not realizing how much they have reduced the size of farad range rated capacitors. As for the theory... Fuzzy ain't got on me.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Which experts have I argued with, as in a disagreement, that wasn't just a misunderstanding?

Yes, I am occasionally wrong, but example please.

Electromagnetics. Capacitors. Field theory. Wave propogation. Pretty much all calculus beyond simple limit theorems. Series versus parallel circuits. The function of a flywheel. Rotational motion in general. Power.

But hey you can show graphs and pie charts off of wikipedia!!!

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Of those you have selected, I have been wrong with El Nono several times. I don't recall arguing with Agloco, I agree with him. We had some clarifications that I see as just misunderstandings.

Am I wrong Agloco about this with you?

Are you claiming Fuzzy is right and I'm wrong about electronics? No F'n way. The one exception is not realizing how much they have reduced the size of farad range rated capacitors. As for the theory... Fuzzy ain't got on me.

Reduced the size of capacitors. Hers a hint dip : pico is of the order of -12. farad is of the order of 0.

-12 < 0. Ie 0 is bigger you ing dolt.

[Wild Cobra]

Reduced the size of capacitors. Hers a hint dip : pico is of the order of -12. farad is of the order of 0.

-12 < 0. Ie 0 is bigger you ing dolt.

Duh...

Problem is, you think you are saying things I don't know.

[MannyIsGod]

I love to watch Fuzzy take WC to the woodshed. Here's to hoping another verbal beat down ensues.

[Wild Cobra]

I love to watch Fuzzy take WC to the woodshed. Here's to hoping another verbal beat down ensues.

He never has.

Link please.

[LnGrrrR]

Wild Cobra argues with more professionals in their own field than anyone I've ever seen. Its amazing.

I enjoyed him arguing that the military would get paid if a shutdown occurred, in spite of the SecDef saying that troops would not be paid, the multiple news articles listing that outcome in details, and my own personal anecdotes handed down from my military leadership.

[LnGrrrR]

Really? Pick your choice of threads in the political forum. Off the top off my head I can think of you arguing with El Nono, Baseline Bum, From Way Downtown, Agloco, and Fuzzy Lumpkins. All about THEIR fields. Its amazing.

ElNono - WC has disputed some of the IT stuff ElNono has listed
Agloco - Nuclear radiation
FWDT - Legal theory
Fuzzy Lumpkins - Electronics
BB - Math

I'm sure there's more.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Duh...

Problem is, you think you are saying things I don't know.

Obviously, when you claim that the size of capacitors has decreased you really meant that they increased.

As i told you then they have always been able to make large capacitance circuit elements because of how they work in parallel so its not a new development. Farraday understood it back in the mid to late 18th century.

You just do not know about the theory behind it and you do not change those parts. You have a very myopic grasp because your knowledge is limited to ITT and the devices you work on.

Everyone sees right through you, parts changer. Everyone knows your MO. Making bull evasive statements like the above mitigates that not in the least.

[Nbadan]

There are no variables given.

...just thinking abstract...

[FuzzyLumpkins]

...just thinking abstract...

I know what you are getting at but I just do not see the a*x+b form.

Sorry if I seem adversarial or the like. In a weird mood lately.

[Wild Cobra]

I enjoyed him arguing that the military would get paid if a shutdown occurred, in spite of the SecDef saying that troops would not be paid, the multiple news articles listing that outcome in details, and my own personal anecdotes handed down from my military leadership.

And I am wrong at times, and linked the appropriate material that showed I was wrong. Didn't I?

I still have a hard time believing that could happen though.

[Wild Cobra]

Obviously, when you claim that the size of capacitors has decreased you really meant that they increased.

Please put you assumptions on hold and recall that original bout with capacity. I was speaking of physical size decreasing for farad size capacitors.

As i told you then they have always been able to make large capacitance circuit elements because of how they work in parallel so its not a new development. Farraday understood it back in the mid to late 18th century.

That's not what the discussion was about, and I was always well aware of that since the 70's. You however would not acknowledge capacitance decreased when you put enough in series for higher voltage purposes, as the farad size rated capacitors are all low voltage.

You just do not know about the theory behind it and you do not change those parts. You have a very myopic grasp because your knowledge is limited to ITT and the devices you work on.

Believe as you wish. I don't care if yo limit yourself inside that box.

Everyone sees right through you, parts changer.

Knowing how to troubleshoot analog and digital electronics to the component level makes me a "parts changer." I can live with that.

Everyone knows your MO. Making bull evasive statements like the above mitigates that not in the least.

Sorry you are incapable of understanding. Not my problem.

[MannyIsGod]

And I am wrong at times, and linked the appropriate material that showed I was wrong. Didn't I?

I still have a hard time believing that could happen though.

No. You didn't. You simply buried your head in the sand like you always do. Who are you trying to fool? We were there. The threads are still there.

[Wild Cobra]

No. You didn't. You simply buried your head in the sand like you always do.

I was specifically referring to the military shut down in this case. As for burying my head... You are wrong again. LnGrrrR and others kept insisting i was wrong. I did some searching, and linked the material that showed I was wrong. Go to to post #131 of here.

I'm not as hard headed as you make me out to be. You just have to convince me you are right. Not many of you show me material that changes my mind, especially on topics like Anthropogenic Global Warming.

We were there. The threads are still there.

Then link the threads, and quote the relevant material to prove your case.

If it's as bad as you suggest, start a new thread please. Maybe led "Wild Cobra's -Ups."

Damn...

If it's really bad, you may ask to start a new forum...

[MannyIsGod]

You're not that important and besides, everyone already knows it. You can see the responses above if you don't understand that your reputation precedes you by a mile.

[LnGrrrR]

And I am wrong at times, and linked the appropriate material that showed I was wrong. Didn't I?

I still have a hard time believing that could happen though.

You admitted it, but it sure took you awhile

[Agloco]

Of those you have selected, I have been wrong with El Nono several times. I don't recall arguing with Agloco, I agree with him. We had some clarifications that I see as just misunderstandings.

Am I wrong Agloco about this with you?

I didn't get the idea that you were being oppositional. It's clear that others did though.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

WC is going to the line by line.

What a toolbag.

[DarkReign]

Holy 5 pages?

That is exactly what I came to post. Only 7 pages.

[Wild Cobra]

You admitted it, but it sure took you awhile

But at least when I agree someone showed me wrong, I do.

[LnGrrrR]

But at least when I agree someone showed me wrong, I do.

Yes. It just takes an exceedingly high amount of data to get you to change your stance.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Please put you assumptions on hold and recall that original bout with capacity. I was speaking of physical size decreasing for farad size capacitors.

That's not what the discussion was about, and I was always well aware of that since the 70's. You however would not acknowledge capacitance decreased when you put enough in series for higher voltage purposes, as the farad size rated capacitors are all low voltage.

Believe as you wish. I don't care if yo limit yourself inside that box.

Knowing how to troubleshoot analog and digital electronics to the component level makes me a "parts changer." I can live with that.

Sorry you are incapable of understanding. Not my problem.

I have decided to not let this go.

The original discussion of capacitors with me was about you not knowing that they went up to ratings above 1 farad and asked for a link.

I put '1F capacitor' into google and the first page had about 100 of them.

I then had to explain to you that it is easy tocreate that capcitance and has been since the concept was first invented because of how they operated in parallel, ie they were additive.

Obviously at that point you went to wiki and started talking about higher voltage uses of plates in series. Again I pointed out your ing ignorance because of how charge cascades and even in very accurate rated parts there was still a difference in capacitance and if you kept a large drop across them for any perod of time they would explode on you.

As for the improvement in the dialectrics over the last 50 years that is completely moot. The size of the capacitor has never been a limiting factor in the ability to design large capacitance parts. I first experienced those ratings back in the 80s when my brother was building his car stereos.

The only real applications for that are in certain cathodes like very high powered lasers. You would not know that because you change parts in an industrial complex in Washington state. Stick to your starters and simple regulators.

Furthermore I know exactly what the requirements for a masters license are and I doubt you even have one of those. I know exactly what the limits of your knowledge are because I have hired your equivalent many a time.

You're a ing glorified service technician, a parts changer.

When we spoke before you flat out said that you had memorized the troubleshooting checklists long ago. Being able to take drops ad the amp draws to know what circuit board or analog part to change because you memorized said checklist does not make you understand .

All you do is read a wiki page and then resort to sophistry just trying to throw charts and whatever verbage you think makes sense or is a good red herring.

As i have said before, everyone see through your transparent nonsense.

[Wild Cobra]

Fuzzy, you're a loser. You think you were telling me things I didn't know. The only think I didn't know was the fact that the physical size was decreased so much. That is the only thing you schooled me on, so give it a break loser.