What the are you doing right now?
dude, the stats say otherwise. No, not those stats, the other stats.
What the are you doing right now?
Yeah no
You said Iggy was beating him at "every facet of the game". Pick a lane and stick with it.
You make a great point. With all that attention, that must mean Joe Johnson is really racking up the assists by finding the open man.......oh wait, Iggy does that better than him too.
lol advanced stats
If Terry leaves Dallas I could actually root for them sometimes.
so shooting the ball less efficiently. but scoring more points because you take way more shots suddenly means you're better at scoring?
With Iggy being so much better than JJ, he must be leading his team to a better record.
44.5% is less efficient than 44.5%? News to me.
What the does iggy have anything to do with you thinking JJ for Roddy wouldn't be the slightest improvement to this Dallas team?
lol moving the goalposts
what stat other than points per game say Joe Johnson > Iggy. You're the one who said the stats made your argument, not us.
I never once said that you dumbass. I just said trading JJ for Roddy doesn't make Dallas a le contender.
Trading Joe Johnson for Nick Young would make the Wizards better too, but not le contenders.
Career stats say so. This is a down year for JJ. With that said, I didn't know Iggy's assist and rebounding #s were so high, but you'd be re ed to think he's an overall better offensive player than JJ.
Could be a blessing in disguise, actually. Monta can score, no doubt, but he also makes superstars out of scrub perimeter players on the regular. The guy redefines the term "matador defense." Granted, his liabilities on the defense end are magnified by playing for Golden State, but at 6-3, 180 pounds, the top shooting guards in the West (Kobe, et al) would feast on him in a playoff series.
Iggy and Brand would've been perfect. That combo addresses many of the Mavs' current problems (perimeter defense, a low post threat, etc.).
sorry I know advanced stats are your kryptonite but there's this thing called true shooting percentage. also effective FG%. Iggy beats JJ in both of those.
They're not my kryptonite, I just don't use them so I avoid drawing re ed conclusions they lead people to draw....like Beaubois is capable of being a 14 PPG scorer.
Acting as if JJ is hardly better than Roddy says a lot.
The Wizards don't have Dirk. Johnson wouldn't be the #1 option on the Mavs.
Oh well then I guess Dallas better not around with trying to get Chris Paul and instead go after Steve Nash. Career stats say so.
Quote?
I just said Joe Johnson doesn't make Dallas a contender, and there were other better options out there that would.
Knocking Ellis because he doesn't play try to play defense for Golden State doesn't have any legs. Ellis wouldn't hold the bigger perimeter players in the west anyway. And have you seen Roddy play d?
Paul and Nash aren't in a similar age range. Age plays a bigger role with Iggy given how much more his game is based off athleticism.
Maybe so, but his matador defense isn't any different than JET/Kidd/Roddy/Barea. The difference being that he can score way more efficiently.
I think Joe Johnson would make the Mavs a le contender. As is, the Mavs are very close to contention... adding Johnson for essentially nothing would push them into the convo, JMHO
Not that Johnson is that good..but I digress!
By your reasoning Roddy could easily lead the Hawks to the playoffs with equally craptacular numbers as Joe.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)