Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 114
  1. #26
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    27,972
    u'll get 2nd seed, not even Dallas could up a home closer against the punchless hornets.

  2. #27
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    27,972
    So the path would be Portland>Dallas>Spurs/OKC>Heat...with gimpy or nonexistent Bynum...


    Finished

  3. #28
    jthelps.wordpress.com
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    1,887

  4. #29
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    90,829



    Dynasty



    A dynasty is a sequence of rulers considered members of the same family. Historians traditionally consider many sovereign states' history within a framework of successive dynasties, e.g., China, Ancient Egypt and the Persian Empire. Much of European political history is dominated by dynasties such as the Carolingians, the Capetians, the Habsburgs, the Stuarts, the Hohenzollerns and the Romanovs. Until the 19th century, it was taken for granted that a legitimate function of a monarch was to aggrandize his dynasty, that is, to increase the territory, wealth and power of family members.[1]
    A dynasty is also often called a house (e.g., House of Saud and House of Windsor), and may be described as imperial, royal, ducal or comital depending upon the chief le borne by its rulers. Dynasty is also used to refer to the era during which a family reigned, as well as events, trends and artifacts of that period (e.g. "Ming dynasty vase"). In such cases, often "dynasty" is dropped, while the name is used adjectively; e.g., Tudor style, Ottoman expansion, Romanov decadence, etc.
    While contemporary English includes references to an array of prominent or influential families as dynasties, in much of the world, dynasty has been associated with monarchy and defined patrilineally. Kinship and inheritance were predominantly viewed and legally calculated through descent from a common ancestor in the male line. However, men descended from a dynasty through females have sometimes adopted the name of that dynasty while claiming its position or inheritance (e.g., House of Orange, House of Bagration, House of Habsburg-Lorraine).
    Contents

    [hide]


    [edit] Dynasts

    A ruler in a dynasty is sometimes referred to as a dynast, but this term is also used to describe any member of a reigning family who retains succession rights to a throne. For example, following his abdication, Edward VIII of the United Kingdom ceased to be a dynastic member of the House of Windsor.
    A "dynastic marriage" is one that complies with monarchical house law restrictions, so that the descendants are eligible to inherit the throne and/or other royal privileges. For instance, the 2002 marriage of Willem-Alexander, Prince of Orange to Mαxima Zorreguieta was dynastic, and their eldest child is expected to eventually inherit the Dutch crown. But the marriage of his younger brother Prince Friso to Mabel Wisse Smit in 2003 lacked government support and parliamentary approval. Thus Friso forfeited his place in the order of succession, lost his le as a Prince of the Netherlands, and his children have no dynastic rights.
    In historical and monarchist references to formerly reigning families, dynastic describes a family member who would have succession rights if the monarchy's rules were still in force. For example, after the 1914 assassinations of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his morganatic wife Sophie von Hohenberg, their son Max was bypassed for the Austrian throne because he was not a Habsburg dynast. Even since abolition of the Austrian monarchy, Max and his descendants have not been considered the rightful pretenders by Austrian monarchists, nor have they claimed that position.
    The term "dynast" is sometimes used to refer to agnatic descendants of a realm's monarchs, and sometimes to those who hold succession rights through cognatic royal descent. The term can therefore describe overlapping but distinct sets of people. For example, David Armstrong-Jones, Viscount Linley, a nephew of Queen Elizabeth II through her sister, Princess Margaret, is in the line of succession to the British crown: in that sense is a British dynast. Yet he is not a male-line member of the royal family, and is therefore not a dynast of the House of Windsor.
    On the other hand, the German aristocrat Ernst August, Prince of Hanover (born 1954), a male-line descendant of George III of the United Kingdom, possesses no legal British name, les or styles (although he is en led to re-claim the once-royal dukedom of berland), was born in the line of succession to the British crown and is bound by Britain's Royal Marriages Act 1772. Thus, in 1999 he requested and obtained formal permission from Elizabeth II to marry the Roman Catholic Princess Caroline of Monaco. But immediately upon marriage he forfeited his right to the British throne because the English Act of Settlement 1701 dictates that dynasts who marry Roman Catholics are considered "dead" for the purpose of succession. However, the couple's daughter, Princess Alexandra of Hanover (born 1999), remains a legal dynast of both the United Kingdom and Monaco[citation needed], not to mention her father's claim to dynasticity as pretender to the former royal crown of Hanover.
    [edit] Dynasties by region

    [edit] Africa

    [edit] Chad



    [edit] Egypt





    [edit] Ethiopia



    [edit] Guinea



    [edit] Morocco



    [edit] Nigeria



    [edit] Somalia



    [edit] South Africa



    [edit] Asia

    [edit] Afghanistan



    [edit] Bhutan



    [edit] India



    [edit] China

    Main article: Dynasties in Chinese history


    [edit] Central Asia



    [edit] Israel



    [edit] Japan



    [edit] Ryūkyū



    [edit] Korea



    [edit] Maldives



    [edit] Malaysia



    [edit] Mongolia



    [edit] Myanmar



    [edit] Philippines

    Royal Families






    [edit] Sri Lanka

    [edit] North



    [edit] South



    [edit] Saudi Arabia



    [edit] Tibet



    [edit] Thailand


    • Hari Pun Chai dynasty (663 – 1293)
    • Phra Roung dynasty (Sukhothai Kingdom) (1237 – 1438)
    • Mangrai dynasty (1261 – 1578)
    • Eu Thong dynasty (1350 – 1370), (1388 – 1409)
    • Suphanabhumi dynasty (1370 – 1350), (1409 – 1569)
    • Phra Roung Dynasty (Ayutthaya Kingdom) (1569 – 1629)
    • Prasart Thong dynasty (1629 – 1688)
    • Bann Plu Luang dynasty (1688 – 1767)
    • Tipchakratiwong dynasty (Seven princes dynasty) (Lanna Kingdom) (1732 – 1932)
    • Thonburi dynasty (1767 – 1782)
    • Chakri dynasty (1782 onwards)

    [edit] Turkey



    [edit] Viet Nam



    [edit] Champa


    • 1st dynasty (192 - 336)
    • 2nd dynasty (336 - 420)
    • 3rd dynasty (420 - 529)
    • 4th dynasty (529 - 758)
    • 5th dynasty (758 - 854)
    • 6th dynasty (854 - 989)
    • 7th dynasty (989 - 1044)
    • 8th dynasty (1044–1074)
    • 9th dynasty (1074–1139)
    • 10th dynasty (1139–1145)
    • 11th dynasty (1145–1190)
    • 12th dynasty (1190–1318)
    • 13th dynasty (1318–1390)
    • 14th dynasty (1390–1458)
    • 15th dynasty (1458–1471)
    • vacant (1471–1695)
    • Dynasty of Po Saktiraidaputih (1695–1822)

    [edit] Europe

    [edit] Austria



    [edit] Albania



    [edit] Armenia



    [edit] Belgium



    [edit] Bosnia



    [edit] Bulgaria



    [edit] Barbarians

    [edit] Bavarii



    [edit] Franks



    [edit] Huns

    This is a list of rulers of the Huns. Period Ruler

    • Vund c. 360
    • Balamber 360 - 378
    • Baltazαr (Alypbi) 378 - 390
    • Uldin (Khan of the Western Huns) 390 - 410
    • Donatus (Khan of the Eastern Black Sea Huns & beyond) 410 - 412
    • Charaton (Aksungur) 412 - 422
    • Octar[1] 422 - 432
    • Rugila 432-434
    • Bleda with Attila c. 434-c. 445
    • Attila "the Hun" c. 434-453
    • Ellac 453-c. 455
    • Tuldila fl. c. 457
    • Dengizich (Sabirs attack c.460-463) ?-469 with Hernach/BelkErmak
    • Hernach/BelkErmak[2] 469-503
    • House of Dulo Bulgaria (390-503) A Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans genealogy claims that the Dulo clan is descended from Attila the Hun.

    [edit] Scirii



    [edit] Avars

    [edit] Lombards

    See Early kings of the Lombards.

    [edit] Ostrogoths



    [edit] Suebi



    [edit] Vandals



    [edit] Visigoths



    [edit] Byzantine Empire



    [edit] Croatia



    [edit] Denmark



    [edit] France



    [edit] Georgia



    [edit] Germany



    [edit] Bavaria



    [edit] Saxony



    [edit] Hungary



    [edit] Monaco



    [edit] Montenegro



    [edit] Iberia

    [edit] Aragon



    [edit] Asturias



    [edit] Barcelona



    [edit] Castile



    [edit] Leσn



    [edit] Navarre



    [edit] Portugal



    [edit] Spain

    [edit] Before the unification of Castile and Aragon



    [edit] After the unification of Castile and Aragon



    [edit] Ireland



    [edit] Italy



    [edit] Netherlands



    [edit] Norway



    [edit] Poland



    [edit] Roman Empire



    [edit] Romania



    [edit] Russia



    [edit] Serbia



    [edit] Sweden



    [edit] Two Sicilies

    [edit] Sicily



    [edit] British Isles (under English rule)

    [edit] England



    [edit] Ireland



    [edit] Scotland



    [edit] Kingdoms after the Union of the Crowns (1603-1707)

    The crown of the Kingdom of England and Ireland merged with that of the Kingdom of Scotland to form a personal union between England-Ireland and Scotland (the former a personal union itself)


    [edit] Personal Union between Great Britain and Ireland (1707-1801)



    [edit] United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1801-1921)



    [edit] Personal Union of the UK [of GB and NI] and several other Irish states (1921-1949)



    [edit] UK [of GB and NI] (Without the personal union with Ireland) (1949-present)



    [edit] North America

    [edit] Haiti



    [edit] Mexico



    [edit] Oceania

    [edit] Hawaii



    [edit] New Zealand Māori



    [edit] Tahiti



    [edit] Tonga



    [edit] South America

    [edit] Kingdom of Araucania and Patagonia



    [edit] Brazil



    [edit] Inca Empire



    [edit] Political families in Republics

    Main article: Political families of the world
    Though in elected governments rule does not pass automatically by inheritance, political power often accrues to generations of related individuals even in Republics. Eminence, Influence, familiarity, tradition, genetics, and even nepotism may contribute to this phenomenon.
    Family dictatorships are a slightly different concept, where political power passes within a family due to the overwhelming authority of the leader, rather than informal power accrued to the family.
    Some political dynasties:









    Nope, not a single basketball team on that list.

  5. #30
    Pump Bacon Cane's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    3,687
    The worst thing for the Lakers is that you have no young talent in the pipeline, AND you're cap ed for like 3 years. Your best young player can go about 60 games and 28 minutes per game, and then he still seems to break down. Your only other under 30 rotation player is Shannon Brown, and he plays like 12-15 minutes.
    No more Phil Jackson either

    It'll be interesting to see how the older teams in the West will handle the likely shortened season next year as well....

  6. #31
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    DMC, goin' Hal.

    jejejeje!!!

  7. #32
    Knowledge Is Hassle Fpoonsie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    9,674
    Goddammit, DMC.

    This was actually an entertaining thread before your gotry...

  8. #33
    Believe. Mike D's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    434
    DD, relax. So long as the kid is back and playing well the Lakers will be fine.

  9. #34
    Believe. mindcrime's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Post Count
    478
    Yup, pretty much...delaying the inevitable. Sacto will rape us tomorrow and we'll be stuck at 3rd seed...meaning the Lakers would have to play Portland in the first round, then go on 3 straight series w/o HCA to win it all with little to no Bynum. It's over. Start drinking and enjoy the memories.
    I called this about 3 weeks ago. I just don't see Sacto losing what will most likely be their final game in NoCal against the hated Lakers. With that said this is the Kings we're talking about. They can lose to a JV high school team on any given day.

    Question: If Celt's wins tomorrow and Lakers lose who has home court?

  10. #35
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    DD, relax. So long as the kid is back and playing well the Lakers will be fine.
    Deads, actin' like Venti|afraid.

  11. #36
    Veteran lurker's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    2,884

  12. #37
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Team: Dallas Mavericks


  13. #38
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    90,829
    Goddammit, DMC.

    This was actually an entertaining thread before your gotry...
    Awe....




  14. #39
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    27,972
    DD, relax. So long as the kid is back and playing well the Lakers will be fine.
    Too many variables working against them this postseason MD, or I'd agree with you. In all likelihood the Lakers are going to lose tomorrow night, and Dallas will probably beat NOH at home.

    Bynum--although a welcome sight in any capacity--always plays a little more passively and reluctant when coming off an injury (like he's afraid to reinjure it again).

    This means LA will draw Portland in the first round (nightmare matchup that could push us to 7), followed by a road series at Dallas (assuming they dont choke against memphis), then a WCF against either the Spurs (who have HCA) or the Thunder (who are insanely good). Say LA manages to get through all that---they then would get Miami on the road for the NBA Finals.


    It's a recipe for disaster. A win tomorrow would be huge, but I just don't see it. Demarcus Cousins will go off for 28 and 12

  15. #40
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    27,972
    Deads, actin' like Venti|afraid.
    Oh Im sure you were just all smiles when Bynum went down

  16. #41
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Oh Im sure you were just all smiles when Bynum went down
    No, but, I go home with who brung me.

    And Deads, they brung you too.

  17. #42
    Believe. Mike D's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    434
    Deads, actin' like Venti|afraid.
    Keeping cool when put in a tight spot is how you separate em out. Kid Kobe had the stones to step up and follow his convictions; 5 rings later we reap the fields with the gifts of his labor. I'll follow his lead and stay true to the cause, there hasn't been one better since his initiation into the Forum Blue.

  18. #43
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Keeping cool when put in a tight spot is how you separate em out. Kid Kobe had the stones to step up and follow his convictions; 5 rings later we reap the fields with the gifts of his labor. I'll follow his lead and stay true to the cause, there hasn't been one better since his initiation into the Forum Blue.
    - "No sir. You couldn't drag me away."

    - "Sgt. Al Powell" - "Die Hard"

  19. #44
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    27,972
    No, but, I go home with who brung me.

    And Deads, they brung you too.
    Yup, and i'll be pulling for them harder than any other Laker fan, but sooner or later realism needs to be valued over homerism.

    I hedge my bets so I end up a winner on either outcome. If the Lakers 3-peat, then SWEET. Lakaluva can happily have my 2 bills. If the Lakers lose, that would suck, but at least I'd have insurance on the impending grief

  20. #45
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trail Blazers
    Post Count
    28,727
    Lose to Sacramento. I DARE YA!

  21. #46
    Believe. Mike D's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    434
    No point in being a defeatist. The pinks were that way, look where it led em.

    No such thing as insurance against grief. You either put your stones on the line and hold the rope til it gives, or you dont set down the long and winding road at all. Theres no free ride to the top.

  22. #47
    Chillin' like a villain... TampaDude's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    20,120
    Spurs and Heat in the Finals.

    Book.

    It.

  23. #48
    Knowledge Is Hassle Fpoonsie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    9,674
    Spurs and Heat in the Finals.

    Book.

    It.
    Speakin' a' " gotry"...

  24. #49
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    27,972
    No point in being a defeatist. The pinks were that way, look where it led em.

    No such thing as insurance against grief. You either put your stones on the line and hold the rope til it gives, or you dont set down the long and winding road at all. Theres no free ride to the top.
    Pessimism is more fun, because you expect nothing...but if/when they win it's unexpected and euphoric, and not just the ho-hum of the "well, we were supposed to win anyway," at ude.

  25. #50
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    27,972
    Lose to Sacramento. I DARE YA!
    LA will oblige, you needn't worry

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •