Reply With Quote
lol mavfan
He would've been their missing piece. Duncan can't guard the rim by himself. He needs another 7 footer that can control the paint offensively and defensively. So size does matter in the playoffs when the game slows down. Spurs used to have the size. Now they don't.
lol mavfan
lol 1-3
If you want we can give you Matt Bonner for him. He's a good 3pt shooter man!!
Shaq was available and may have stayed healthy here. Gasol surely wouldn't have bullied him around and Tim has done very well against Randolph.
Right now I would take Kevin Willis.
Now we're talking Shaq? Sweet Jesus.
It's come to this...
Might as well jump ship w/ me.
yeah....rather would have shaq anyways....also we all know the mavs are not going to win a championship with or without chandler
Hinging playoff hopes on Shaq is like holding on to a rope that's 3/4 cut
Spurs need a young big body thats 260+ lbs to match up better with the giants of the league like the Gasols and Bynum. Chandler ain't that.
Plus the Spurs don't have the PG's to utilize his limited but effective offensive game (dunks). Also his injuries, price tag, etc.
You act like those kinds of players just grow on trees
Nope, good giants are pretty rare. Even stiffs like Haywood and Dampier will get huge paydays in this league. Marc Gasol is going to make some money after this playoffs run.
Yeah since getting 13 offensive rebounds would be useless for the Spurs.Mavs wouldn't be the same team without Chandler. That's a fact.
It doesn't take a genius to realize we needed more size. Another 7 footer with experience to compliment Duncan. This was a problem I saw going into the season but it was forgotten by many because of the Spurs great start and affective small ball play. Sadly I miss Mohammed and Nesterovic.
4 rings got
Wouldn't matter if Spurs had any of these bigs. I'm not sure Pop would play them becuase of their lack of ability at shooting the 3's.
Chandler would be an upgrade but the Spurs have outrebounded the Grizz. And Chandler still doesn't match up well with the 260+lbers of the league.Yeah since getting 13 offensive rebounds would be useless for the Spurs.
Chandler has had a good contract year but he's going to be expensive, has injury concerns, he's significantly smaller than the giants of the league, fouls like crazy, etc. Those 13 offensive boards are impressive but he's had some stinkers for boxscores as well.
Of course that's a fact. BTW no one is arguing against that.Mavs wouldn't be the same team without Chandler. That's a fact.
The Spurs needed Chandler alright - Wilson Chandler.
WE DONT NEED CHANDLER CAUSE WE HAVE THIS GUY:
He's shooting worse than RJ this postseason...that is a feat unto itself.
Good when shoot free (easy 3 point shots)
W.Chandler > Bonner and RJ
That was the entire reason behind drafting Splitter. Look no further. He was supposed/is supposed to be Duncan's partner in the paint. He was also the reason why Scola was traded. Now you have him - use him.
that 7ft we needed ended up playin in europe for peanuts, while we dished out 3m for bonner...
rasho looms
Welcome 2008 info!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
