Reply With Quote
Trump Unable To Produce Certificate Proving He's Not A Festering Pile Of
http://www.theonion.com/articles/tru...-hes-no,20250/
Seriously…Did anyone else know that his mothers name was Stanley?
http://cbskrth.files.wordpress.com/2...birth-cert.jpg
Trump Unable To Produce Certificate Proving He's Not A Festering Pile Of
http://www.theonion.com/articles/tru...-hes-no,20250/
Tell you what WC, why don't you and the millions of other people tell the White House exactly how many ways they have to reproduce it in order to satisfy everyone, and I'm sure they'll get right on that.
For some reason, she went by the name Ann.
You would lose that bet.
Stanley Ann Dunham…Who names their daughter Stanley? This is the real story…
Why would you trust your own judgment if you personally examined it? Are you an expert on forged do ents? Would you be able to tell the difference between a real and forged do ent in your hands?
He would have to keep his mind open to the possibility he had no idea what he was doing.
Do you miss the point?Tell you what WC, why don't you and the millions of other people tell the White House exactly how many ways they have to reproduce it in order to satisfy everyone, and I'm sure they'll get right on that.
They do a press conference to put to rest the birther idea, and do the opposite.
How can they be so stupid, or was it planned?
If I saw the do ent as linked here, without that BS way it's embedded, I would again be a solid believer he was born here.
Maybe they just wanted to point out how absolutely stark-raving mad birthers are, and that no level of evidence would be "proof" enough. I think they did a pretty good job of that, personally.
I once said that no matter what they produced, there would still bbe those claiming it was a forgery. However, to actually release something that can be a forgery in the eyes of reasonable people...
Whats stupid was letting this simmer on the stove for two years. Agree, if there had been any dirt on him the Clinton's would have already used it.
And they proved you right.
Sorry, but it's not a forgery to anyone that's reasonable. It's a forgery to crazy 9/11 people who got hooked on why an I looks slightly different, or any number of inane reasons.
And considering most of the "OMG it's a forgery because of _______" questions have been answered, it's even funnier that people still think it's a forgery.
You dismiss Mouse for wanting specific and exact details for every factor of 9/11, and yet, you're doing the same for this do ent. The seeming inconsistencies that Mouse cites for 9/11 are of the same nature as the ones you are raising.
You look as crazy as he looks when you say that if you can't prove one thing about a situation/instance, the whole thing is suddenly thrown off. Might as well throw out what we know about gravity, reality, chemistry, economics, psychiatry, physiology and every other science too using that logic.
He probably didn't let it simmer long enough tbh.
maybe he was waiting for someone like trump. lol
What about it is BS? Please tell us, since I'm sure you're an expert not only in Hawaiian do ents from the 1960's, but also an expert in Adobe Acrobat, image editing and the various other fields you'd need to know about to determine this was a fake.
The paper do ent simply will not have two layers. Is that so hard to comprehend?
So if they just printed out the PDF you'd be satisfied.
So what's your point?
So the PDF do ent has layers. Please explain to us why that implies there might be a forgery. Please explain in as technical a format as possible.
Or you could pull a Mouse and say something like, "I have no expertise whatsoever, but it looks fishy, and that's good enough to me."
pretty simple explanations for the layers... there are "layers" because most of the text was able to be scanned as text. The white was knocked out by the OCR application in order to process the text. The items that could not be processed as text were processed as an image. If you open the PDF in photoshop you have two options: Page or Images. If you use Page you get one layer with the whole page. If you do Images you get one image with white knock-out where the OCR text is....
My God, you're a real idiot.So if they just printed out the PDF you'd be satisfied.
No.
The paper that the PDF was made from.
What if that was made from a PDF?
-The sky is blue!!!
*Prove that you liar!
-LOOK! You know, up there
*There is some white up there too, Prove to me that there isn't an enormous blue glass case surrounding us that someone spilled white paint on.... Or prove that I am not wearing invisible blue glasses that a bird on!!!
- Well I guess we could shoot both the imaginary glass above us, and in front of your eye.
* I won't be satisfied until we do!
- We both know you are lying, you wont be satisfied even then.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
