The one consensus one I don't get is Bird over Duncan and O'Neal. There's nothing accomplishment-wise or statistically to suggest he was better than either.
And I've always had a hard time believing that Russell and Chamberlain are better than Duncan, O'Neal and Olajuwon. I'm not saying definitively they weren't, but I look at the era they played in and the compe ion they played against and it doesn't compare to the past thirty or so years. Give them the advantages of today's players and maybe they're as good now as they were then (not in terms of averages; advanced stats-wise), but I'm not convinced. Russell's lack of anything resembling an elite or even high level offensive game makes him being supposedly better even more questionable.
The only players I can look at and come to the conclusion that they were definitively better than Duncan and O'Neal, are Jordan, Abdul-Jabbar and Johnson. Beyond that, I'm not sure. I have a hard time ranking pre-80s players. So excluding pre-80s players, I'm going to go with . . .
1) Jordan
2) Abdul-Jabbar
3) Johnson
4) Duncan
5) O'Neal
6) Bryant
7) Bird
8) Olajuwon
9) K. Malone
10) James
It may be pre-mature to put James there, but he's like Duncan eight seasons in (minus the championships, of course). He's just too damned dominant statistically to be ignored and it's obvious he's going to go down as the greatest ever at his position. You could make a case for M. Malone, Garnett, Wade and a few others at 9 and 10, but for me, K. Malone's longevity at an elite level gives him the edge.

Reply With Quote
