Bynum would still ride the pine behind Bonner
Is it really gonna get any better for either team tradewise?
Of course LA can rely on it's long tradition of collusion and ref rigging. Bynum for Dwight Howard or somesuch. But let's say shock ensues and the Lakers attempts (if any) to trade Bynum are done fairly. (I know, just suppose).
Publicity Magic claims a trade is in the offing.
I'd do Parker for Bynum in a second. Yes he's a , Laker style, but then what are the current 2008- Greg Pop Spurs if not es? Freakin Jefferson and Bonner as the SF/PF combo. Pop has driven the Spurs to joke status so why not blow it up?
"I'm not Peter Holt", "Poops coatailed to 4 les" blah blah blah.
I'm just asking if you would do this trade if you had the power.
Bynum would still ride the pine behind Bonner
Trade without Bonner or RJ in is stupid!
I'd do that only if the f.o. decide we are in a rebuilding mode...and they realizae they have the chance to make other trades.
Parker (plus Green or 2^ ch.) for Bynum + Ebanks (so he could jopin his old teammate Butler)
Gino + Dice contract for Iguodala + Speighs
Jefferson + Bonner for M. Williams + Pachulia
then we draft a play maker with our 29 draft choice or we take one via f.a.
Ginobili is not going to be traded. Parker might be but I seriously doubt it.
But I would definitely trade Parker for Bynum. Dude is a beast when healthy and was after he came back from his injury this season.
So now we can transition our playoff hopes from relying on Manu's ankles, to Bynum's knee? Pass.
that will never happen. next.
I'm down
DO it, R.C and Mitch
I'm down if the fakers take RJ off our hands as well.
I'd do a Parker/RJ for Bynum/Artest swap with some fillers from LA.
My only hesitation would be the thought of George running the point![]()
I would much rather Parker for Odom but I'm not sure how that would work either. Parker is a better player then Bynum and Bynum can't shoot the 3 so he would just be Bonner's back up anyway. Seriously though giving up TP for an often injured player sounds to be to much of a gamble and Spurs could do much better then this if they really wanted to trade Parker.
Great thread...![]()
Some team will probably overpay for Bynum. Tremendous young talent - but the list of guys who have dealt with his injury list by the age of 23, then suddenly stayed healthy for long productive careers is extremely short.
Yeah who wouldn't if the Lakers would include Soft for Artest.
Not going to happen.
I may take Odom for Parker too but...
Back to the Bynum for Parker. What player(s) do you think the Spurs could do much better? What other team is gonna offer better then Bynum?
odom doesn't have much productive time left.
I would not trade Parker for either Bynum or Odom.
Hill cannot be the pg so that would leave a whole at starting pg.
I think a major dilemma is whether or not the FO thinks they have one more run left.
Do they trade Parker for an impact player who may only stick around a year or two?
OR
Do they trade Parker for two or three pieces that are part of a long term rebuilding play?
Bynum will never have a complete healthy season...and I hate that smoker.
If Parker were to be traded...I would hope that the spurs stipulate that Bonner would HAVE to be included.
Parker is not athletic enough to play PG for the Lakers…It would never happen….
If that were to happen, Bynum would have to sit out the first 5 games because of the Barea foul. In these 5 games Bonner would probably make 35 of 36 threes and Pop would just sit Bynum and play Bonner 30minutes a night...
The Lakers on the other hand would get the quick PG they need and find a way to fill the hole Bynum left with M. Gasol.
I hate Bynum... not Spur material.
Yeah, that Barea foul was too much even after the fact that Barea killed the Spurs in 09'.
Would not want Bynum. Would not want to trade Parker - even though he did a disappering act in most of the games in the playoff. I hope they trade their 1st pick and RJ (or Bonner, I know not likely) and move up a few picks. Include a 2nd, whatever. Get rid of the dude.
Bynum is a grade "A" bird and Id rather we do without his "talents".
bynum would be a pretty good gamble for the future. some spur fans are pretty blind. bynum's potential is off the charts. he's already a good shot blocker, great rebounder, pretty agile considering his size, and has a very good fundamental understanding of working the low post. the kicker is that he's only 23. bynum's contract isn't that bad either since he'll have a team option in 2012 i believe. if he continues to be injured next year, the spurs can just cut him or trade him to a team that wants cap space. i would insist that the lakers take bonner's contract as well though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)